Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?

1997-06-14 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Mark Baker wrote: : :In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, : Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : :> Both qmail (which proved insecure ) and Exim are not capable :> of UUCP or even bang paths! So a lot of those guys in countries where phone :> costs are terrible (like

Re: problems with SHA-1

1997-06-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Shaya Potter wrote: :On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Bruce Perens wrote: : :> The problem with SHA-1 is that it is a U.S. Federal Information Processing :> Standard, and I don't trust that the U.S. government will not place export :> restrictions on it. I'm also wary of U.S. FIPS for th

Re: problems with SHA-1

1997-06-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 25 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote: : :> IBM developed a cypher called "lucifer". The NSA examined it, :> recommended some changes to the algorithm, and the result was DES. : :Changes which, we now know, *strengthened* it against differential :cryptanalysis (which they new about in the 70's, and

Re: status of bzip

1997-12-12 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 11 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote: : Michael Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > > Whoops, forget I said the above sentence, I can't seem to find bzip : > > anywhere in Debian... My fingers automatically typed gzip instead of : > > bzip when searching :-( : > The last time it was seen in non-u

sulogin timeout, in /etc/init.d/checkroot

1997-12-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
Now that we're using rcS.d rather than /etc/init.d/boot, I've noticed some different behavior from 'sulogin'. I have "SULOGIN=yes", so I have a chance to go single-user on reboot. However, the timeout does not work! If I reboot the machine, I must physically hit "^D" to continue the boot, no mat

Re: sulogin timeout, in /etc/init.d/checkroot

1997-12-23 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 23 Dec 1997, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, : Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : >Now that we're using rcS.d rather than /etc/init.d/boot, I've noticed : >some different behavior from 'sulogin'. I have &quo

Re: cron jobs more often than daily

1998-01-05 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: : On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 01:26:56PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: : > On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 09:48:42PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: : > > However, there's no suitable user for this and it needs : > > to run as root anyway to reset the accounting stats. :

Re: dpkg's version comparison algorithm?

1998-01-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, David Frey wrote: : Hello collegues, : : I don't understand dpkg's version compare algorithm: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : /var/debian/unstable/binary-i386/math$dpkg --compare-versions 1.15 lt : 1.2-1; echo $? 1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : /var/debian/unstable/binary-i386/math$dpkg --com

Integrating main, "non-us" ftp site

1998-01-11 Thread Nathan E Norman
If I attempt to do a dselect install via ftp from a local mirror which has both the main debian distribution as well as the "non-US" stuff, it doesn't work. Not without jumping through some serious hoops, at any rate. The problem is that the Packages file on the non-US site do not follow the same

Re: NPR piece on Linux

1998-04-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote: : Anyone have a digitized copy of this? :) : : Thanks, http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/980408.atc.14.ram -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet - 410 South Phillips Avenue - Sioux Falls, SD 57104 mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] f

boot-floppies package

1998-04-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
Hello, We have a ton of older PS/2 MCA machines around here, many with ESDI disks, others with the IBM SCSI HBA. Neither ESDI nor the IBM HBA are supported by the current rescue disks. So, in a not quite right state of mind, I decided I would make some boot floppies so that my coworkers, and any

Re: boot-floppies package

1998-04-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Vincent Renardias wrote: : : On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: : : > We have a ton of older PS/2 MCA machines around here, many with ESDI : > disks, others with the IBM SCSI HBA. Neither ESDI nor the IBM HBA are : > supported by the current rescue disks.

Re: boot-floppies package

1998-04-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: : : > Hello, : > [ snip ] : If all you need to do is put a different kernel on the rescue floppy : (which is what it sounds like) simply take the delivered image, mount it, : and copy the kernel image fro

Re: boot-floppies package

1998-04-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: [ snip ] : > Furthermore, it might become necessary to change the available modules : > (I honestly don't know whether this is the case), and I don't believe : > the rescue disk has device files for ESDI disks. They are /dev/ed[ab], : > correct? Vincent R

Re: scanning my ports

1999-09-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, John Lapeyre wrote: : Dear Security Staff: :I received 2086 connection attempts at several ports on September 22. : The attempts were made from IP address pavlov.midco.net [24.220.0.13] : The machine whose ports

Re: scanning my ports

1999-09-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 26 Sep 1999, Mark W. Eichin wrote: : In addition to apologies to Mr. Norman, perhaps there's some value in : either (1) making tcplogd etc. require enough configuration to force : people to read the documentation, or (2) enhance those packages to : interpret things a little more, so they sc

Re: Packages to remove from frozen

2000-03-08 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 11:26:12PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > Michael Stone wrote: > > > Not very backward-compatible, is it? In some environments it's desirable > > > to have the software behave the same on every platform; even if i

Missing parse-xf86config "breaks" login.app [was: Re: New version of xserver-svga gives poorer display on laptop]

2000-03-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 02:48:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:05:43PM +0400, Konstantin Kivi wrote: > > I also had to add > > Set_LCDClk 40 > > to the Device section. Be aware that parse-xf86config > > used in /etc/init.d/xdm doesn't unserstand it > > Be awar

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-29 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Larry Gilbert wrote: > > > Why is murphy.debian.org not adding a "Received:" header to show where > > messages are originating? This information is useful when trying to > > track down actual spammers. Is

Re: Location of -doc documentation?

2000-12-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:48:32PM +0100, Arthur Korn wrote: > Joey Hess schrieb: > > Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > > I just noticed that `apache-doc' puts the documentation under > > > "http://.../doc/apache";, while `debconf-doc' puts it under > > > "http://.../debconf-doc/";. > > > > Eh? (Deb

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:53AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Brian May wrote: > > > > - harder to administrate /etc/passwd as more users exist. > > I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm > annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is that > reall necessary?

Re: Location of -doc documentation?

2000-12-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 11:35:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > > > "http://.../doc/apache";, while `debconf-doc' puts it under > > > > > "http://.../debconf-doc/";. > > > > I beleive the original

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:05:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Martin. Yes. I tried. Do you think I'm a newbie or something? Why > do you think the file is owned by root? It's on windows partition... Hold on ... this is an msdos partition mounted? If so, check out man 8 mount; specificall

Re: 'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote: > Hello > > I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago. > > Two questions: > > 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? > >$ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade [ snip ] >The following packages have been

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-03 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:11:21PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > [ Miles Bader writes ] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes: > > > As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual > > > editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the > > > reason

can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:55:32PM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote: > > Hate to state the obvious, but on a DEFAULT Debian install, if nothing is > > changed, root's default path with be dictated by /root/.profile ... Maybe > > the machine be

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 04:38:10AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > Hi Matt!! > > I don't report a bug due to misconfiguration. Let's see if what you > see applies, though. [ snip rude and silly reply ] [ time passes ] On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote: > Hi Adam, >

Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:42:57PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:57:11AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:14:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > I apologize for prolonging this thread - it's quite annoying. >

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

2001-04-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:59:42PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 12:09:12AM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:28:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > > > Unless you care about performace. Which is the main reason to use > > > different packages for each C

Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat

2001-04-22 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:23:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > in that case, a far better solution is a package containing a bunch > > of pre-generated kernel .config files, plus a menu script to copy > > your choice to the right subdirectory (e.g. /us

Re: Debian 10th birthday gear

2003-07-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:44:06PM -0400, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote: > > > > > 100 million users > > > > 1000 installations > > > > > > I would recommend to exchange these last two lines. More installations > > > than users? > > > > actually they are million users :) > > > > Is it

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:56:57PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > > Could you run X 4.2 in, say, s390 that date? > > Never ask a Gentoo user that question. The answer is always one of the > following: > > 1) "I don't

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:19:14PM -0800, Jon Kent wrote: > > > Never ask a Gentoo user that question. The answer > > is always one of the > > following: > > > > 1) "I don't care" > > 2) "What's S/390?" > > I really don't care ;-), when I am or 99.999% of > Debian users ever gonna get near a S/

Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?

2002-11-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:18AM -0500, Sean Proctor wrote: [ snip ] > ... Anyway, Gentoo has a much > different niche than Debian, so I don't understand why people are arguing > about changing Debian because of it. If Gentoo serves their needs better, > good. Perhaps Debian can then focus less

Re: rfc1149

2001-05-02 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >11 years ago IETF described a IP protocol to transport IP datagrams using > >pigeons. See > > > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt > > > >Sadly enough, noone has still implemented this protoc

Re: why dig ? I wanna use nslookup !

2001-05-02 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:13:08PM -0400, Jacob Kuntz wrote: > from the secret journal of John H. Robinson, IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > it says ``that a user would obtain by installing''SO this means: on > > (say) a Debian 2.1 system, if a user were to get the tarbal, and compile > > it against

Re: (OT) Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-05-02 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:21:49PM +0200, PiotR wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:30:10AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:42:04PM +0200, PiotR wrote: > > > If you short circuit both PS's outputs then the voltage is the same and > > > there won't be any reverse current

Re: cvs not updating correctly

2001-05-08 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 05:29:30PM -0400, Jon Eisenstein wrote: > > I use cvs in Debian for lots of things but I'm still a newcomer in > > this field, I think I am not being able to get new created directories > > and files from the cvs repository with an cvs update, are there > > arguments or opt

Re: how can Euro symbol be displayed under X [4.0.3]?

2001-05-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:34:44PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote: > Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Not everyone. It's a square here, on the console. Just like good ol' > > pong. > > Right, because you're using a limited mailer which can't show > different charsets. 8^) (A rather dec

Re: sysctl should disable ECN by default

2001-09-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:47:05PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Why should the default configuration be changed to a

Re: Student Looking for A Final Year Project

2001-09-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote: > Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I hate CVS, i thought everyone else did as well and people only used it > > because of a lack of alternatives. > > http://subversion.tigris.org OT: galeon does not like this website muc

Re: A language by any other name

2001-09-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 02:12:46PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote: > > Therefore, without emotion and with a pragmatic hand to guide me, I > > feel that English should be an alias for en_US. > > s/without emotion/with typical American patriotism/ > s/pragmatic/dogmatic/ Patriotism != jingoism. --

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:49:11PM -0600, Brian Wolfe wrote: > Instead of many new packages, why not make people pick up the orphaned > stuff, and find replacements or adopt packages that have been DOA upstream? In a volunteer organization, you can't _make_ people do anything. You can enco

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:52:39PM -0600, Brian Wolfe wrote: [ a bunch of stuff I didn't read, because ... ] If you're going to participate on the debian mailing lists, consider doing so with a mailer that understands and honors the Mail-Followup-To: header (yes, I know it's not an "official" sta

Re: on potato's proftpd

2002-04-02 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:22:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > dear list, > > look, i am really not here to start a flame war and heck no, i don't > want one. please excuse if my behaviour has been leading you onto this > belief (or maybe not). i am simply failing to grasp the arguments laid >

Re: Debian Conference 2 Registration

2002-04-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:51:23AM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 18:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > The keyword here is "prominent". > > > > Yes, it is. > > > > > The > > > Debian servers don't run non-free soft

Re: Rsyncable GZIP (was Re: Package metadata server)

2002-04-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:11:27PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 13:16, Otto Wyss wrote: > > > A large mirror in Australia does provide an rsync server to access debian > > > packages. When redhat 7.0 came out so many people tried to rsync it at the > > > same time, the machine

Re: Faster Release Cycle = More Up to date Packages...

2002-04-11 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote: > Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and > thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal. > > Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few > moments and take this

Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?

2002-04-19 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote: > Hallo? > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Over six months ago, on 2001-11-14, [...] ^^ ^ || | Year -+|

Re: VI reasons (was Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.)

1998-06-11 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Wichert Akkerman wrote: : Previously Dale Scheetz wrote: : > ae already does this, and provides a reasonably vi ish interface, just to : > satisfy those whose fingers are only programmed for vi. : : Personally, I find ae's vi-compatibility even worse then normal ae: it : tric

License

1998-06-14 Thread Nathan E Norman
Where can I find a good reference to LICENSES? We are looking at EW-too (the talker code) - here is the license: The EW-too code and concept are copyright Simon Marsh, August 1994. Permission is hereby granted for the code to be copied, changed, and used for any non-profit making purpose in

Re: FIX FOR HAMM: timezone problem

1998-06-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, John Goerzen wrote: : : > : > Hi, : > : > I noticed with surprise tonight that my clock was an hour off. : > : > Investigating the matter revealed that /etc/timezone said : > US/Central. running /usr/sbin/tzconfig and setting it

Re: FIX FOR HAMM: timezone problem

1998-06-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Brandon Mitchell wrote: : On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : : > On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, John Goerzen wrote: : > : > > Investigating the matter revealed that /etc/timezone said : > > US/Central. running /usr/sbin/tzconfig and setting it to : > > SystemV/CST6CDT fixed t

Re: FIX FOR HAMM: timezone problem

1998-06-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : Sorry to have stayed out of this but I have been busy... : : Bottom line...tzconfig is broken. That may be :) : If you look at the list provided under US there is an entry of : Indiana-Eastern, and Arizona... as well. These should be linked to their :

Re: FIX FOR HAMM: timezone problem

1998-06-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Nathan E Norman wrote: : : > On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote: : > : > : Sorry to have stayed out of this but I have been busy... : > : : > : Bottom line...tzconfig is broken. : > : > That may be :) :

Re: More corrupted utmp/wtmp

1998-06-19 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Troy Hanson wrote: : I am having problems on 2 machines (both upgraded from bo). with the : utmp/wtmp. : : The output below is from a machine that never has had an Xterm running : (telnet access only): : : $ last : ;* *.*5 192.168.5.51 Wed Dec 31 21:26

Re: FIX FOR HAMM: timezone problem

1998-06-20 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 19 Jun 1998, John Goerzen wrote: : Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > What exactly makes you say that the central timezone doesn't deal with : > DST? If you mean "US/Central" I will have to disagree with you. :) It : > works fine here. : : It did

Re: Gothenburg -> Vancouver

1998-06-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 24 Jun 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: : Oki, I'm leaving for Vancouver next Friday (3/7). I'll be stopping by London : over the weekend and leave Sunday around 1800. I don't know when I'll be : back online, I'll get 'Net access through 'Rogers wave'... xDSL, jummy :) Wildly off topic ... isn't

Re: Gothenburg -> Vancouver

1998-06-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Avery Pennarun wrote: : On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 05:06:06PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: : : > > Wildly off topic ... isn't "The Wave" cable modem access? : > : > Hmmm... You really got me there... I have been lead to beleve it's xDSL, : > but I'm not sure... Anyone? : :

Re: 19980623 Work-Needing and Prospective Packages

1998-06-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Jules Bean wrote: [ snip ] : While I'm typing, what mailing list is the WNPP on? It doesn't seem to be : any of the ones I'm on... I believe it's on debian-devel-announce - that's where I see it anyway :) -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet - 410 South Phillips Avenue - Sioux Falls,

Re: Gothenburg -> Vancouver

1998-06-24 Thread Nathan E Norman
On 24 Jun 1998, Rob Browning wrote: [ snip ] : IP whenever you initially fire up your computer and click their "start : button", but that's the extent of my knowledge. Mainly I don't know : if they've got some proprietary way to configure the connection. I believe RoadRunner uses a proprietary

Re: what's after slink

1998-10-03 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote: [ snip ] : That's from the credits, but there are some more : : r.c. (mentioned previously) : molly : snake : robot : etch : mike : mr. spell : lenny : claw : : There were a few others, but I couldn't pick out the names from the : soundtrack.

Re: what's after slink

1998-10-04 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote: : On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 10:45:36PM -0400, Justin Maurer wrote: : > : > ah, but imdb is missing one important character (at least!). : > rc! the radio control car! : > : > i say "rc" should be 2.2, as i have before. : : Debian 2.2, on the FTP sit

Re: Live file system

1998-10-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote: : On Tue, Oct 06, 1998 at 07:37:10PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: : > > Do we have a complete filesystem on CD like SuSE does? It's a nice addition : > > for those short in disk space. : > : > Please send an appropriate patch to the debian-cd mainta

Re: Debian 2.[01] -- Only rudimentary support for Laptops?

1998-10-15 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote: : Hi, : : > I have an IBM ThinkPad 380XD. I have found that 2.0.x kernels just don't : > work properly, my machine will crash or shutdown during boot. I believe that : > the best thing that can be done to support laptops is to create boot

Re: Intent to package netStreamer

1999-02-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote: [ intent to package snipped ] Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural revelation? -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net finger [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Intent to package netStreamer

1999-02-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote: : : On 01-Feb-99 Nathan E Norman wrote: : > On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Shaleh wrote: : > : > [ intent to package snipped ] : > : > Is there a URL for this, or is the code only available via supernatural : > revelation? : : Only the truly

Re: Steve Lamb in my killfile.

1999-09-16 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Jonathan Walther wrote: : Will someone please notify me when Steve Lamb becomes a reasonable person. : As of 2 minutes ago, all mail from him is being sent to /dev/null by : procmail. Notification will be on the 11:00 news right after "Hell Freezes Over" and "Monkeys Fly O