On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 22 janvier 2013 à 14:57 +0100, Svante Signell a écrit :
> > Worthwhile to read, definitely.
>
> Yet full of misinformation, like the idea that using D-Bus makes a
> service less scriptable (while the reality is a complet
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:01:50PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Libjpeg-turbo website [3] has all the signs of an healthy open source
> project - A SVN repo with many commiters, bug tracker, a mailing list
> with open discussion etc.
libjpeg-turbo is also used by webkit, blink, and gecko.
Mike
-
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals
> for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and
> some were already discussed very recently):
>
> * multiarch compatible binNM
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:11:29PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 16/01/2014 17:36, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
>
> > quick heads up for everyone maintaining xul-ext-* packages:
>
> (CCing pkg-mozext-maintainers@lado then)
>
> > We
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
> Pérez Meyer:
> > > Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
> > > two developers, who both use uscan to get the origi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 08:06:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I guess it just unpacks, removes and repacks. Which also means it would
> > be quite annoying in my own workflow which involves unpacking/repacking
> &g
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:53:21AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 07 avril 2014 à 23:55 +0100, Wookey a écrit :
> > +++ Kevin Chadwick [2014-08-27 20:55 +0100]:
> > > It also supports focus follows mouse, no raise on click
> >
> > I had forgotten, but this was the 'killer feature' tha
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:56:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
> the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
> architectures. The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
> alre
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:21:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Xavier Roche writes:
>
> > I have a rather silly question: most (all ?) packages are built by
> > default with -02 - something which is inherited from autotool's '-g -O2'
> > default flagsd, I presume.
>
> > Is -O3 considered too da
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:40:17PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> there are several programs which open(URL) and span external webbrowsers
> like "icewesel2. The problem I am encountering is, if you use several
> profiles and have them open like "private", "devel" and "electronic
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:22:24PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin
>
> * Package name: git-hg
> Version : 20110408-1
> Upstream Author : Barak A. Pearlmutter
> * URL : https://github.com/barak/git-hg
>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 04:09:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 09:19 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 à 14:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 20:47 +0800, YANG,Chao wrote:
> > > > dpkg --print-architecture shows
> > > >
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:25:30AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 27, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > The reason is that the kind of entities which require FIPS 140 probably
> > > also tend to require corporate vendor support, wh
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 07:48:54AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-04-30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> People try out new things in experimental, and it seems to work mostly
> >> well to get new stuff migrated from there via unstable to testing onc
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > That being said, it would be really helpful to be able to get buildds
> > to build the mozilla.d.n packages...
>
> Would it work to build the packages in uns
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:18:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 13:28]:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 12:16]:
> > > > That being said, it
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 17:57]:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:18:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) [110430 13:28]:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 201
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 01:32:19AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> FWIW I think that "rolling" or "CUT" miss the point entirely. As a
> Debian user I use stable on my servers (with a few backports for the 3-4
> things I need bleeding edge for). For my desktop I use unstable, and
> when that breaks
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:23:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 12:16:54 AM Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Julien Valroff wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 04 mai 2011 à 00:02:01 (+0200 CEST), René Mayorga a écrit :
> > >> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at
Hi,
I just found out that gcc is compiled with --with-arch-32=i586, which
effectively means it builds with -march=i586 by default (and that it
still claims an i486-linux-gnu target).
I'm wondering. Is the project at large aware that we're not building for
i486, but for i586 ? That even the mainta
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Emil Langrock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have currently the problem that I have to use large, computing intensive
> applications [1,2]. These are usually implemented in many source files. I
> used
> in the past pseudo c files which include all other c files [3]
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 08:04 -0400, Durandal Dokucheyav wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am contacting you guys on behalf of http://gitbrew.org. We have
> > recently released the otherOS++ firmware for the Sony Playstation 3,
> > allowing
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:10:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are 23 packages in unstable which can't be installed on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD because of their unconditional dependency on fuse-utils.
> On this platform, fuse4bsd should be used instead.
>
> I indent to file one bug r
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:22:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 06:51:17PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > In fact, a minimal systemd system will win in almost very aspect against
> > a remotely similarly powerful sysvinit system: you will need much fewer
> > processe
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:03:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:14:39PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I'm sure that systemd does much better than a traditional sysvinit boot
> > > with
> > > /bin/bash and no dependency-based b
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: A few observations about systemd"):
> > What's more, neither of the 'ports' to other kernels increases hardware
> > support.
>
> What they do provide is healthy competition for Linux. There are
> reasons why
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 20, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > > Again, why?
> > ZFS is a pretty big one.
> It is about as stable as BTRFS on Linux, so I do not see either a
> compelling argument right now.
BTRFS ? stable ? You must be living in the future.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:51:44AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-07-19, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If we're talking about shared libraries, this is a non issue. the .la file
> > is named like the .so symlink, i.e. without the soname; dlopening a shared
> > library without specifying an sona
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 13:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Julian Taylor, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:32:27 +0200, a écrit :
> > > You might be able to reduce startup time by only linking against the
> > > libraries you need or lazy
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:54:37PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: bluegriffon
> Version : 1.1.1
> Upstream Author : Disruptive Innovations,
> http://www.disruptive-innovations.com/
> Daniel Glazman
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:46:41PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Description : Modern WYSIWYG HTML editor based on Gecko
> >
> > Yay, one more copy of the gecko engine :(
>
> Your fear it won't be able t
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:19:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/08/11 at 19:52 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On 2011-08-11, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >> Think of both user systems and the Debian buildds which will waste more
> > >> time - an especially bad problem on slower architectures.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due
> to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to
> build. In fact, the build is now generally failing because either
> disk or mem
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:52:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:01:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Just to be explicit, PIE tends to have small (<1%) performance hits on
> > register-starved architectures (i386) in most cases, for for certain work
> > loads (e.g. python)
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:03:56PM +0100, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
> Dear Debian developers,
>
> When trying to create a package that includes the library, I am reported
> the following error by lintian:
>
> E: libosra1: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libosra.so
>
> I understand what the problem i
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> Now with wheezy happy and out the door, we should finally tackle a long
> open issue. Developer repositories (AKA PPA) for Debian.
Now with jessie happy and out the door, what is the status of Developer
repositories
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 09:23:26AM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello
>
> Am 05.05.2015 um 23:45 schrieb Mike Hommey:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >> Hello world,
> >>
> >> Now with wheezy happy and out the door, we sh
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:42:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:40:45AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Jun 09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> >
> > > open question: is there a perceived need to dig into the source code
> > > of firefox and, just as was done
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:51:42AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:28AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > POST
> > https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/downloads?client=Iceweasel&appver=38.1.0&pver=2.2&key=no-google-api-key
> > + a few dozens of GET requests to https://
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:28AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> GET http://www.ebay.com/favicon.ico
> GET http://en.wikipedia.org/favicon.ico
> GET http://www.yahoo.com/favicon.ico
> GET http://www.google.com/favicon.ico
> GET http://www.amazon.com/favicon.ico
> GET http://www.yahoo.com/favicon.ico
>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:09:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > FUD is easy. How about documenting yourself on how Safe browsing
> > actually works? Hint: urls are _never_ sent to Google. The worst thing
> > that Goo
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:50:18PM +, Christoph Riehl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:51:42AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:28AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > > POST
> https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/downloads?client=Iceweasel&appver=38.1.0
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:18:08PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:26:16PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:51:42AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:28AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:56:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes ("Re: The Spirit of Free Software, or The Reality"):
> > On Jul 15 2015, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > So I made this experiment with Iceweasel. These are the requests it
> > > makes with a fresh profile, before you even
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:07:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > BTW, that's something that would need to be resolved once and for all by
> > an SPI lawyer, because a) Mozilla's lawyers consider those icons kocher
> > as MPL-licensed icons and b) that's a problem broader than just
> > iceweasel, as
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:38:12PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > I, myself, find our DFSG-freeness pickiness going too far, and I'm sick
> > of this icon thing. So, here's what I'm going to do: unless I hear
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:57:41AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > You could make a screenshot from where the original icons are shown,
> > then re-encode those tiny 16x16px thingies into new *.ico files with
> > GIMP. This is sorta like taki
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:09:37PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Screenshots of games during play are not the same as logos.
>
> Are you saying that screenshots of logos aren't derivative works of those
> logos?
I
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:36:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Bas Wijnen:
>
> > I have some experience with safe browsing, but indeed I have not
> > looked up how it works. I do know that it continuously sends data
> > to Google, and I have quite a bit of confidence in their capability
> >
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:08:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Eduard Bloch , 2015-07-23, 19:43:
> >The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about
> >12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or
> >similar commands. When this was done a just co
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 01:21:44PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I have worked with the Rust upstream sources
> > well enough to know these issues. You have a regression in Rust 1.25 and
> > you will have a very hard time trying to bisect the issues simply because
> > you cannot even build 1.25 u
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:07:46AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 02:48:32PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Would you be willing to also implement
> > > Tainted-By: not-built-in-a-chroot
> > > ?
> >
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:28:31AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > [ Please note the cross-post and respect the Reply-To... ]
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This has taken a while in coming, for which I apologise. There's a lot
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:46:41PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > .
> >
> > Note that Firefox is built with --no-keep-memory
> > --reduce-memory-overheads, and that was still not enough for 32-bts
&
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:04:49PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2019-05-08 22:35:58 +0200 (+0200), Ansgar wrote:
> > Adam Borowski writes:
> > > I've recently did some research on how can we improve the speed of
> > > unpacking
> > > packages. There's a lot of other stages that can be improv
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:01:27PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:37:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:38 AM Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > > Thus, even though we'd want to stick with xz for the official archive,
> > > speed
> > > gains from zstd ar
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:50:34PM +0200, Joaquín Rufo Gutierrez wrote:
> Hello Debian users,
>
> We are happy to announce that Debian 13, codenamed "Trixie", is
> expected to be released sometime in 2024, following the usual 2-year
> release cycle.
Bookworm was released in 2023. The usual 2-year
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:01:23AM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> This backdoor abused the IFUNC mechanism in the GNU toolchain to hook into
> the sshd process. Looking on my Debian sid workstation with about 1900 library
> packages installed, I see a very small handful of source packages shipping
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:21:12PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paolo Greppi writes:
>
> > What is the best approach for d/changelog when releasing a package to
> > unstable after it has been through a few iterations to experimental ?
>
> > It would seem that the right thing to do is to keep all
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:17:29PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:35:42PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 01/09/2020 14:05, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am not shure if I can help, but I can try and have a look at it.
> > >
> > > Yes p
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:48:44AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:36:16AM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > Briefly: synaptics is much better touchpad driver than libinput.
>
> For me, the opposite is true. After Raphael's mail yesterday, I
> switched from the synaptics d
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:48:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> W. Martin Borgert:
> > On 2016-10-12 21:41, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >> ❦ 12 octobre 2016 18:54 CEST, Martín Ferrari :
> >>> I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard
> >>> requirement. Is this not the case any m
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 07:32:12PM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:32:45PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > On 01/05/2017 02:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Quoting Riku Voipio (2017-01-05 12:53:16)
> > >> Vast majority of users would only install this via dependencies
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:35:52PM -0500, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> Hi Debian Developers and followers,
>
> Thunderbird is back in Debian! We also renamed other related packages to
> use official names, e.g. iceowl-extension -> lightning.
>
> For now, we need testers to catch existing issues and
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 02:09 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
> >
> > As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
> > soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usa
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:01:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > I expect nothing much different from previous ESR cycles: stretch will move
> > to 60 after 52 goes EOL in September.
>
> Does anyone know when firefox-esr in unstable will swi
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
> Quack,
>
> It seems the project is leaving the decision about Weboob onto me, so I'll
> try to address it.
>
> The diversity statement tells me we should welcome others even if they are
> very different and with conflicting o
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Romain Bignon wrote:
> On 22/Jul - 10:15, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote:
> > > but... https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/232
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out. It's not in yet and I've just asked upstream
> > to clean this mess.
>
> This i
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Do, Jul 26, 2018 at 01:59:08 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Stephan Seitz - 26.07.18, 11:10:
> > > I don’t understand the problem. No one forces anyone to keep the
> > > package in Debian. Upstream made clear it isn’t interes
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 08:19:17PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The problem: when a .deb package is installed, upgraded, or removed,
> the maintainer scripts are run as root and can thus do anything.
>
> Sometimes what they do is an unwelcome surprise to the user. For
> example, the Microsoft Sk
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:02:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2017-08-08 15:53:34 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Now, where to put it? Into devscripts? The disadvantage is that devscripts
> > already pulls in quite a few other packages via recommends. But I don't
> > have a better idea.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>
> On 10/04/2016 08:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The only use case I could imagine is to create an executable that can
> > > run outside of Debian.
> Static builds are still common in (parts of) scientific co
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 06:44:45AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
>
> On 10/04/2016 23:08, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/04/2016 08:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>>
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:16:32AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I'm doing something wrong, looking
> for advice. If one wants to deprecate a conffile locate in an otherwise
> empty directory (let's say /etc/foo/bar), the following happens at new
> package
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:55:17AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 00:39:10 +0200, Fay Stegerman wrote:
> > * Guillem Jover [2024-09-24 17:45]:
> > > Personally, I think fully migrating from zlib to zlib-ng would sound
> > > great (even for trixie), but I guess we can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: git-cinnabar
Version : 0.7.0~beta.2
Upstream Contact: Mike Hommey
* URL : https://github.com/glandium/git-cinnabar
* License : MPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:02:29PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> In the future, if users can easily filter out locale data, we could
> decide that that's the easier path to support such users, and that fewer
> package maintainers need to maintain separate -l10n packages.
The future is 14 years old
801 - 877 of 877 matches
Mail list logo
