On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 09:07:46AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 02:48:32PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Would you be willing to also implement > > > Tainted-By: not-built-in-a-chroot > > > ? > > > > What do you want to do with that? Even our own stuff not always uses > > chroot, why should it? > > The idea here is to record facts about the system where a package was > built. Building in a merged-/usr system does not necessarily produce a > broken package. Not building in a chroot is also not necessarily a > problem, but still, we want to know that. > > Now, as Andrey points out, nowdays a chroot is not the only type of > minimal system where one can build packages, so maybe a more > sophisticated check would be required.
"Only Essential: yes and direct build dependencies installed"? Why not extend .buildinfo with the list of all packages installed that aren't Essential:yes or build dependencies? Mike
