On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer
wrote:
> * Theodore Tso:
>
> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 revision to the Debian
> > Social Contract, which I objected to them, and I still object to now.
> > If there was a GR which chainged the Debian Social contract
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> As others have pointed out, there is such a distribution, gNewSense; in
> fact, if you look at [2], you will find that there are five others,
> Ututu (the first fully free GNU/Linux distribution recognized by the
> FSF), Dynebolic, Mu
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer
> > wrote:
> >> * Theodore Tso:
> >>
> >> > I'm not ashamed at all; I joined before the 1.1 r
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:02:46AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> (moving to -devel with a reply-to)
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > Running the 'file' command on
> > '/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/epiphany.mo' reveals a "GNU message
> > catalog (little endian), revision 0
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 06:52:00PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:44:01 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd add as a condition for this to be a reasonable
> > request, the fact that there should be enough packages with enough
> > test-only dependencies, w
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:47:59PM +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-19 18:40]:
> > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.19.1828 +0200]:
> > > "What are these tools good for? Mainly for controlling large
> > > collect
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:57:35PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >> Parallel scp (pscp)
> >
> > FYI (and if you don't already know) /usr/bin/pscp is also provided by
> > putty-tools.
>
>
> That's something I'm still wondering about - I can't see the advantage
> of pscp o
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:54:40AM -0400, Marvin Renich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Absolutely *wrong*.
>
> Gnome and KDE are targeted primarily at desktop users, not servers. If,
> as a desktop user, I install a graphical app on my machine, I *expect*
> to see that app in the main menu. The p
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:17:51PM +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:54:40AM -0400, Marvin Renich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Absolutely *wrong*.
>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:50:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 25-Jul-07, 13:28 (CDT), Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If an application is used so infrequently, it shouldn't have its place
> > in a menu.
>
> That turns out not to be the case. If I use
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:38:59AM +0200, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> SCNR...
>
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frank> That turns out not to be the case. If I use an app frequently, then it
> Frank> goes on the toolbar. The menu is for finding infrequently used apps
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 juillet 2007 à 13:35 +0200, Florent Rougon a écrit :
> > > Eye candy... oh right, this must be why there are so many people
> > > interested in bringing a compositing manager to metacity, rather tha
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:13:13PM +0200, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Witness:
> >> - usable completion in the File Open dialog -> gone
> >> - customizable keyboard
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:56:11PM +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:50:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 25-Jul-07, 13:28 (CDT
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:28:46PM -0400, Ricky Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ricky Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: smolt
> Version : 0.9.8.3
> Upstream Author : Mike McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : h
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 04:23:56PM -0400, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/29/07, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ciol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > >> Are you aware of backports.org?
> >
> > > But backports are recompiled packages from test
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:05:32PM +, Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh dixit:
>
> >OTOH, specifically using something else than /bin/sh for a fast
> >POSIX-with-the-extensions-Debian-mandates shell
>
> No, that will not make sense. People who write #!/
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:22:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > > > Then he'll be able to move /bin/sh symlink on bash if he wants to.
>
> > > > Right. Hence that's the point for the user to change /bin/
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:30:33PM +0100, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Policy does not mandate that ALL Recommends: are to be installed. The
> new default makes Recommends: disappear completely - there would be no
> difference between Depends: and Recommends: just like there is a
> p
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:01:22AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> PS: I'm very fond of the apache (to be removed) Recommends. really.
> especially on a notebook, it helps understanding how broken the
> recommends chain is right now.
I don't know for your case, b
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:19:37PM +, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 02-08-2007, Mike Hommey:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:01:22AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> PS: I'm very fond of the apache (to be removed)
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:15:38PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:13:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:54:49AM
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:19:29PM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:17:59PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
>
> I really like the idea, thanks for this proposal!
>
> A comment about file patterns
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 11:13:16PM -0700, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> * Having to munge the license text to fit it in the 822 format is one of
> the uglier bits of this proposal, especially since we don't require
> that license texts be DFSG free..
Surely, any license text, b
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:22:25PM -0400, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > At least with debian.org, it appears the CSS specifies a font of "Arial,
> > Helvetica, sans-serif", which means if msttcorefonts isn't installed, it
> > falls back to the ugly bitmap Helvetica fonts. Which s
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace
> > the MS fonts.
>
> Have their licensing issues been solved?
Which ones ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 09:09:07AM +0900, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:10:53PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> > Roger Leigh wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I would personally like to see this happen, but until it does we are
> > > limited (I believe) to the glyphs
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:52:45AM +0100, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With apache1 being removed, isn't it the right time to remove gtk1
> (and glib1.2) as well?
It's also time to remove libxml1.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 08:51:31AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> To all users of ICU, and particularly to maintainers of packages that
> depend upon ICU, I have uploaded a new ICU to experimental. This is a
> "draft" release, as they call it, of ICU 3.8. There are some ne
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 04:52:53PM -0500, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> [Mike Hommey]
> > Frankly, I'm not even sure the bump of soname is necessary on the
> > library.
>
> That's an upstream question, though, right? Keeping an old
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:17:59PM +0200, Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello, I would like to gather comments about a proposal I have been
> thinking about during the GPLv2/v3 and GPLv2/CDDL discussions. I have
> finally written down what I have in mind here, and refined it with the
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > HTTP_PROXY, or http_proxy (and ftp_proxy) is used in many
> > applications within Debian.
> >
> > There is a well-known remote attack using HTTP_* variables can be
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:38:37PM -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed August 29 2007 1:28:32 pm Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:20:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > >>> I don't think so. Hasn't tar defaulted to something approximately
> > >>> /dev
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:23:05AM -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > and there's precedent with the netscape communicator packages from the
> > pre-mozilla days. These were statically linked against several things
> > afaik, motif iirc.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:11:51PM +0200, arno renevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: arno renevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: xulrunner-l10n
> Version : 1.8.1-1
> Upstream Author : Mozilla Project and Mozilla Localization
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:45:18PM +0200, arno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007, à 17:50:35 +0200, Mike a écrit :
> >
> > Actually, it *does* allow global extensions, but applications embedding
> > libxul or using xulrunner have to initialize the extensions manager by
>
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:35:51PM +0200, Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: url2file
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : Loic Dachary
> * URL or Web page : http://spec
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:35:51PM +0200, Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Package: wnpp
>
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> same here, do we really need a package for a wrapper around xsltproc,
> >> where the GPL header is larger than the script itself?
> >
> > Why not to put that script inside the xsltproc p
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:38:35AM +0100, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:07:52 -0700
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The problem is that some of the services that have to be restarted are
> > display managers, and restarting them will kill any
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:51:02AM +1000, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ben Finney wrote:
> > > Again, I don't see what's preventing people from using [other web
> > > browser] software if they want to.
> >
> > Maybe a significant amount
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:26:37PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 11140 March 1977, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>
> >> I don't consider it something needing fixing.
> >> It is a good way to have the copyright files occasionally reviewed.
> > I don't think that old source package
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gitpkg
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://people.debian.org/~ron/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:53:34PM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:42:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:49:26AM +0930, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> _rene_ reported me a failure with openoffice and the new dpkg-shlibdeps.
>
>
> Scanning
> debian/openoffice.org-writer/usr/lib/openoffice/program/libswui680lp.so
> (for Depends field)
> dpkg-s
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:31:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is all explained in
> > /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d
> >
> > It seems that all you need to do is to create inside your chroot a
> > simple shell script /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:10:35PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:00:22PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > While I realise that it is sometimes difficult to deal with hundreds
> > of old bug reports, there are other ways of dealing with this kind of
> > issue, such as ta
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:49:47AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Juliusz Chroboczek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Also node that many bugs are sometimes hard to reproduce, because you
> > > need a very specific environment that the maintainer not always have
> > > (e.g. the issue I have is th
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:48:11AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 03 Oktober 2007 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Stanislav Maslovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: fuse-convmvfs
> > Version : 0.2.4
> > U
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> if you just set up .git/gbp.conf correcty (once) - you can certainly
> oveerride gbp.conf on the commandline at any time.
A bit OT, bit why not use .git/config ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > dh_movefiles(1) says that "dh_install is a much better program, and you are
> > recommended to use it instead". Accordingly, I've changed the packages I've
> > adop
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:16:12AM +0200, Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mhh'k... Archivesize... How many percent of the whole mirrorsize belong to
> -dbg
> packages?
Well, if the whole archive was to have debug packages, they would take a
significant amount of space.
Mike
--
To UNS
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:59:17AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
> >
> > > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate i
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:50:09PM +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey [Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:28:12 +0200]:
>
> > Now, a bit OT, but i'd appreciate if dh_install would create hardlinks
> > instead of copies.
>
> I'd vote for t
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:36:04PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> So, what am I missing? How do I get access to an amd64 system to fix
> this problem?
try the sid_amd64_pure chroot ;)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:18:25PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> This is one of the changes sought by Emdebian to support using Debian
> on embedded devices where storage space is far from cheap and involves
> running counter to the current Debian default of "install everything
> that works, every
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:04:48PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> This is one of the changes sought by Emdebian to support using Debian
> on embedded devices where storage space is far from cheap and involves
> running counter to the current Debian default of "install everything
> that works, every
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:52:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:23:39PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 19:35:41 +0100
> > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:04:48PM +, Ne
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:13:58PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:07:54PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > There is no need to specify --host when not cross-compiling, and
> > > specifying
> > > it will result in autoconf believing that
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:43:34AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> This is a bad suggestion and was apparently made without referring to
> >> the existing Debian instructions for how to handle packages that u
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:01PM +0100, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I couldn't upload my package into the incoming queue with dupload
> because I could not connect to ftp-master.debian.org on port 21 and 22.
>
> May I missed something?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:01:34PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> many wrapper scripts contain things like
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=foo:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> This is bad because if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is unset, it will expand to
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=foo:
>
> which is interprete
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 04:28:24PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: can Breaks be used already? (was Re: Opinions
> sought: mlocate appropriate for Priority: standard?)"):
> > I think you mean that Ian Jackson always recommends upgrading apt and
> > aptitude prior to perform
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:20:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > With debhelper 5.0.61, dh_makeshlibs will also call dpkg-gensymbols if it
> > finds debian/.symbols (or debian/.symbols.). So
> > for packages using debhelper, the only thing to do is to drop the right
> > symbo
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 05:01:22PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Homepage field in debian/control
(...)
> This was implemented in dpkg 1.14.6.
>
> Vcs-* fields in debian/control
(...)
> This was implemented in dpkg 1.14.6.
Do these need build dependencies versioning or is it only an end-user
is
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:22:56PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Some pre-generated symbols files can be downloaded on
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols/
>
> Beware, those files have been auto-generated and should be verified by the
> maintainer (check that the version are correct,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:05:41PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:20:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > With debhelper 5.0.61, dh_makeshlibs will also call dpkg-gensymbols if it
> > > finds debian/.symbols (or debi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:24:47PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> Fellow developers,
>
> I'm requesting some assistance on bugs 451767 and 451978 (which are
> the same). On some 64-bit platforms, the ICU packages create 32-bit
> libraries. Unfortunately, the dependencies on the 32-bit library
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:22:56PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since the upload of dpkg 1.14.8 to unstable, it's now possible for
> library packages to generate "symbols" control files that will be used by
> other packages to get more accurate (and less strict) dependencies.
>
> As
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:35:50AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm testing this on libxml2. I'd have some remarks:
> > - The .symbols file in /var/lib/dpkg/info is bigger than all the other
> > maintaine
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:30:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, since we discussed this during the QA meeting: I just rebuilt all
> packages in lenny. 226 packages are failing to build, which is a lot
> better than in unstable.
>
> I didn't find any particular transition that would
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 05:11:52PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> What do you think of such a system? Please share your ideas and
> comments!
I think there is a problem using build dependencies for that purpose:
There are dozens of reasons why you want to build-depend on libfoo-dev
>= version that
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 décembre 2007 à 19:35 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > I think there is a problem using build dependencies for that purpose:
> > There are dozens of reasons why you want to build-depend on libfoo-dev
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:13:09PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le samedi 01 décembre 2007 à 02:11 -0300, Martín Ferrari a écrit :
> > On Nov 27, 2007 3:56 PM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The new poppler version needs some specific files that contain some
> >
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:10:03AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Gabor Gombas
>
> | On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:14:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> |
> | > It's fairly common to add a sleep in restart to (try to) deal with
> | > issues such as reopening a socket.
> |
> | But if the listening s
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:53:50PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > As per release goal, gnome 1.x won't be shipped in Lenny. I just started
> > a first round of bugs (severity important for now), with user/usertag
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/gnome-1.x-removal so that people
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Albin Tonnerre
>
>
> * Package name: e17-modules-svn
> Version : 0.16.999.063
> Upstream Author : e17 development team
>
> * URL : http://www.enlightenment.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:02:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> POSIX says:
>
> If the AI_CANONNAME flag is specified and the nodename argument is
> not null, the function shall attempt to determine the canonical name
> corresponding to nodename (for example, if nodename is an alias or
>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> >>What do you, folks, think of this case ?
> >I would merge the change even if the package doesn't exist.
>
> What about lintian crying in the rain ? More seriously, can we
> assume that we'll never have pa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey
* Package name: dehydra
Version : 0.9.hg20100123
Upstream Author : Mozilla Corporation
* URL : https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Dehydra
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C, C++, JS, tiny bits of python
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all
> > ports
> > since at upload time it only contains the source and
> > architecture-independant
> > binary
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 06:42:07PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 01:14:35AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 à 22:58 +, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> > > I need to run a command as the superuser inside
> > > game-data-packager (gdp). Up until now, I
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
>
> Source package name
> ===
>
> The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the
> enhanced application. These
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> 2010/2/2 Mike Hommey :
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla exten
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi -devel,
>
> > The Mozilla extension packaging team decided to use xul-ext- (instead of
> > mozilla-, iceweasel-, etc.) as prefix for all Mozilla extensions [1].
> > This will group the extensions visually. There are currently 1
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we
> add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security
> issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to
> increase the signa
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 13/02/10 at 21:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we
> > > add
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:00:19AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
>
> > However, what could be done is to rewrite DDPO in a more "modern" way,
> > leveraging UDD (as DDPO-by-mail does). Since almost all the data is
> > already in UDD, it's main
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/02/10 at 20:20 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> >
> > > On 15/02/10 at 00:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > I "accept" the mails by deleting them unread. I know where the PTS
> > > > is, I don't nee
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:33:19AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Other than that, with your core file, could you at least get (and send)
> > the output for disassemble, info registers, and info locals ?
>
> Attached.
There definitely is something weird going on, because according to the
value in
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry E. Oboukhov (un...@debian.org):
> > There are many packages in debian contain flag images.
>
>
> I think this whole thread answeredsomething that wasn't asked in
> your question (is is good or bad to use flags
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:30:34AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2010-03-03, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > wou...@celtic:/var/lib/dpkg/info$ ls *md5sums|wc -l
> > 2340
>
> > In this day and age of completely and utterly broken MD5[0], I think we
> > should stop providing these files, and maybe pro
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:29:09AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:35:18 +0100
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:30:34AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > >
> > > The md5 sums isn't to be used in case of a break in, as
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:06:20AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > In this day and age of completely and utterly broken MD5[0], I think we
> > should stop providing these files, and maybe provide something else
> > instead. Like,
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:03:05AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Do we agree to mount these filesystems on /dev/ subdirectories?
> Fedora[1] uses /dev/hugepages/ for hugetlbfs, and while we had a
> discussion on debian-devel@ about where cgroups should be mounted there
> was no clear winner.
> The u
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:51:11AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > /dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
> > devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
> > Why should cgroups control files, which are hardly device files, be
> > found under
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Hello,
> it's since 2007 that cache for dpkg has been proposed but maintainers never
> replied. For this reason I've written a shared library libtdpkg.so to wrap
> open/fstat/rename/unlink calls from dpkg for .list files in order to cach
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:08:51PM +0100, Philippe Coval wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Philippe Coval
>
>
> * Package name: freewrl
> Version : 1.22.5
> Upstream Author : John Stewart, Sarah Dumoulin ... crc.ca>
> * URL : http://freewrl.source
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:34:37PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki [100322 17:27]:
> > I am talking about new style debian/rules:
> > ---
> > %:
> > dh --with patch $@
> > ---
>
> That is missing some
> .PHONY: binary binary-arch binary-indep clean bu
501 - 600 of 877 matches
Mail list logo
