Hi!
I'd love to get some input about an idea which I expressed in
https://bugs.debian.org/1079603 - namely, to move static qemu-user
emulation binaries from qemu-user-static package to qemu-user package
(which contains dynamically-linked binaries with exactly the same
functionality), effectively
at 08:48:35AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Package: nsd3
Version: 3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Current /etc/init.d/nsd3 contains the following code which gets executed
_every_ time the script is run, even before checking the cli arguments:
--- cut ---
mkdir -p /var/run/nsd3 &&am
Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:48:35AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Package: nsd3
Version: 3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Current /etc/init.d/nsd3 contains the following code which gets executed
_every_ time the script is run, even before
The Fungi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:13:25PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[...]
And as others in #debian pointed out the overlooked obvious, `chown -R'
follows symlinks. So it's sufficient to put a symlink to /etc/passwd into
/var/lib/nsd3 to get the system 0wned.
[..
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 01:51 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Currently you can install kernel images from unstable or backports
>>> without any extra dependencies. I'm not aware of any significant
>>> breakage though some packages may rely on deprecated an
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, maximilian attems wrote:
[]
>> On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support
>> and not all net/ has netns support yet.
> It's not just that, AFAIK there is no match for many of the
> user_beancounters features (especially the accounting part) and
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I googled a bit and found this old mail about a klibc only initramfs:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/07/msg00400.html
>
> I would really like to do this and it has been close to 4 years since
> that mail. But it doesn't look like there has be
Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27.02.2010 at 21:59:39 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> ]] Faidon Liambotis
>> | Beyond that, I've also seen filesystem corruption when using live
>> | migration and the filesystem cache hasn't been disabled -- an almost
>> | undocumented directive of libvirt's XM
26.05.2010 22:32, Daniel Baumann wrote:
[]
how about adding your parameters to EXTLINUX_PARAMETERS in
/etc/default/extlinux? then they will be used for all images in the
config automatically.
in case that's not what you were looking for: as stated in another mail,
i've added update-extlinux/extl
06.06.2010 02:13, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hi folks.
I recently got my first SSD payed by my university and, even though
modern SSDs seem to have smart wear leveling algorithms and more and
more parts of kernel/userspace support TRIM, I was thinking about what
one can do to improve its li
17.02.2011 07:07, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'd like to get some feedback on whether i should implement some changes
> in the unbound debian packaging:
>
> * integration with resolvconf as a provider of recursive DNS
> resolution. (#562031)
>
> * retrieving a list of upstream
The $Subj basically says it all.
I'm trying to review configuration of different busubox
packages, but I don't really see the intention for some
of them, especially for the -static flavour of it.
As originally created by Erik Andersen back in early
2000s, busybox-static intended to be a rescue/re
01.03.2011 14:56, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 19:54, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> 2011/3/1 ximalaya :
>>> I notice that, valgrind reports memory leaks against some frequently used
>>> commands on Debian 6.0, 5.0.7 and 4.0. These commands include netstat, ps
>>> -ef, ls -latr, top, etc.
13.03.2011 16:09, Павел пишет:
> Добрый день!
> Скажите пожалуйстаУ меня есть сайт, стоит на дебиан 6. Есть ли
> пакеты которые поддерживают нашу зону .рф Я так понял что postfix не
> поддерживает. Может есть или подскажите как лучше быть? или мне надо
> перейти на .ru
.рф = .xn--p1ai . Это н
01.08.2014 11:37, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a first step towards source-only uploads, the archive will now accept
> source-only uploads provided the following conditions are met:
>
> * The source package is not NEW and does not build NEW binaries.
> * Architecture-independent (arch:a
Hello.
For a very long time, we had a busybox variant which is linked statically,
for rescue or other similar purposes (for those who don't know, busybox
provides minimal implementations of varios system utilities so can be used
almost alone as a replacement for whole (minimal) system).
But with
07.10.2014 08:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
[]
>>> Was the removal of gethostby* APIs from the static glibc intentional?
>
>> Yes. It's the nsswitch problem. The behavior of those APIs is controlled
>> by the nsswitch mechanism (specifically the hosts configuration), which is
>> inherently dynamic a
On 27.04.2012 00:17, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 27/04/2012 02:59, Oleg wrote:
>> Yes, i'm searching a tiny httpd for an embedded system with cgi support and
>> possibly with http basic authentication support.
>> Thank you. I didn't know about busybox httpd.
>
> No problem. busybox httpd suppor
On 27.04.2012 14:49, Oleg wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:34:52PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Heck. Thank you for reminder. I was looking at something to
>> replace bozohttpd I use (because it is just too buggy), but
>
> What bugs does it have?
$ dmesg | grep
On 30.04.2012 16:55, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:58:18AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
>> * Russ Allbery [2012-04-29 17:32 -0700]:
[]
>> If dma would be the default MTA, then it should IMHO be as reliable as
>> possible and even try to prevent user errors. If a user would
>> unin
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
/proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs
when switching to new root. Original reporter included
a trivial patch for initramfs that does re
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> Wonderful.
>
> I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation,
> and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is
> a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why
> it is not.
Ok.
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list]
>>
>> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed
>> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how
&
On 13.08.2012 00:50, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 12, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> Not good. Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then?
> Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so
> it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for
It is laughab
Hello.
It's been not once when I hit an issue described below.
Now I hit it in one of the packages I maintain, but so
far I can't figure out a good solution for it.
The issue is with package renaming and handling of dpkg
maintscripts.
Having in mind typical renaming scenario: package A has
been
On 02.09.2012 21:21, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[]
>> Basically I want to ensure that if one installs package B to
>> a system with A installed, A should be upgraded to A' at the
>> same time. This works when upgrading A to A' (satisfying A'
>> dependency and installing B), but does not work when
On 02.09.2012 23:54, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 23:17 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [...]
>> But the OP system does not have old autofs5 package installed,
>> only the config files from it, and the maintscripts. Which is
>> exactly the problem.
>&g
On 03.09.2012 12:15, Guillem Jover wrote:
[]
> But then --control-path was intended only for read accesses for things
> like dpkg-repack or dpkg-reconfigure, never for *removing* files from
> the dpkg database. Removing such files from maintainer scripts is just
> *wrong*, the correct solution is t
In qemu package there's a source file, pc-bios/spapr-rtas/spapr-rtas.S,
which is an PPC assembly file with exactly 5 instructions:
#define KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE 0xf000
#define KVMPPC_H_RTAS (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x0)
.globl _start
_start:
mr 4,3
lis 3,KVMPPC_H
On 15.09.2012 00:31, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:15:51AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> This file is also included in the upstream source in compiled
>> form, as pc-bios/spapr-rtas.bin. This is because it needs
>> ppc assembler to compile, and not e
On 15.09.2012 01:03, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:15:51AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>> So we have the following options:
>>
>> 1) package just this single file, of 20 bytes long, in a
>>separate Arch:all package, in it's o
25.10.2013 20:47, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
[]
#717731
upower: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are
logged in
http://bugs.debian.org/717731
#717554
systemd: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are
logged in
http://bugs.debian.org/717554
B
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Tokarev
* Package name: libiscsi
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Ronnie Sahlberg
* URL : https://github.com/sahlberg/libiscsi
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : iscsi client library
On 25.12.2011 12:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 07:07 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
>> It seems to me that wanting to have / outside LVM but /usr inside LVM is a
>> fairly obscure corner case.
> I have about 100 servers setup this way, and my laptops as well. I really
> don't see why this wo
On 13.01.2012 03:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
[]
> All are currently broken. Whether they cause severe breakage depends
> upon the individual case. Some are working apparently OK, e.g.
> mdadm. Others are doing broken things to try and create device nodes
For mdadm an upstream patch is needed. I alr
On 18.01.2012 18:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
> clone 653073 -1
> retitle -1 df: [patch] Please ignore rootfs in df output
> reassign -1 coreutils
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>>
>>> Forty years of pleasant df(1) and mo
On 19.01.2012 19:09, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 18:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> clone 653073 -1
>> retitle -1 df: [patch] Please ignore rootfs in df output
>> reassign -1 coreutils
>> thanks
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 03:05:58PM +010
On 20.01.2012 11:55, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[]
>>> And yes it is kinda trivial to add a call to realpath(3) to
>>> busybox (or equivalent).
>>
>> Or add readlink into initramfs-tools, for that matter.
>>
>> But it is still not clear if it is a bug or not :)
>
> As a side note: With LVM you ge
On 20.01.2012 14:21, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:19:00PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> The "problem" is that kernel does not know what /dev/mapper
>> is, or what does /dev/r/usr thing mean. It knows these by
>> their canonical (and mea
On 20.01.2012 21:53, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>> Marco, at which point did Debian userspace started requiring devtmpfs?
> The next udev release.
The same which will move things to /usr ? :)
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-re
18.12.2012 17:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 18 dec 12, 09:20:25, Willem van den Akker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am willing to maintain the packages jabberd2 and udns. I have already
>> uploaded new versions of both packages to mentors.debian.org.
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/package/udns
>>
On 21.12.2012 02:29, Willem van den Akker wrote:
> Thanks for getting new [udns] version into stable.
FWIW, it is not stable, it is unstable. This version
will not hit stable before wheezy is released.
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
[Replying to an old message]
20.12.2013 19:29, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
retitle 726551 ITA: microcom - minimalistic terminal program
owner 726551 !
thanks
Hello,
my colleagues and I are using microcom much at my work place and the
last upstream releases were done by a colleague. So I'm willing
26.07.2011 02:46, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> What virtualisation solutions should be supported?
>> - Virtual Box seems like a natural candidate since it's free and
>> included since Squeeze.
>> - Vmware has a significant installed
29.07.2011 18:02, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> What virtualisation solutions should be supported?
>
> Open Virtualization Format (OVF) is the only format that should need to be
> supported. VirtualBox, VMWare, RHEV, AbiCloud, Citrix X
Hello!
TL;DR: skip to The Question: below.
QEMU system mode is a whole-machine emulator which is able to run
virtual machines of various architectures. Here's the current list
of emulators on amd64:
total 417456
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mjt mjt 24042800 Apr 18 20:50 qemu-system-aarch64*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mjt m
19.04.2023 11:41, Christian Ehrhardt пишет:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:47 AM Michael Tokarev wrote:
..
But while I see the appeal of reunifying I also have often liked (and
seen people appreciate and use) this being split and explicit.
Do you consider your proposed qemu-system-native be a meta
07.02.2024 11:06, Helmut Grohne :
..
pam seems difficult:
| extern time_t pam_misc_conv_warn_time; /* time that we should warn user */
| extern time_t pam_misc_conv_die_time; /* cut-off time for input */
Attached is a sketch to make pam compatible.
I had a more complete and *tested* fi
31.03.2024 12:16, Andreas Metzler wrote:
...
Looking through testing, I see the following t64 libraries present:
libaio1t64
libfyba0t64
libglibmm-2.68-1t64
libnetcdf19t64
libudns0t64
libczmq4t64 (virtual package; libczmq4 provides this)
Unfortunately the other four are not similar, but rather
08.05.2022 18:24, Michael Stone wrote:
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Tokarev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Stefan Hajnoczi
* Package name: libblkio
Version : v1.2.2
Upstream Author : The libblkio Contributors
* URL : https://libblkio.gitlab.io/libblkio
* License
15.01.2016 22:47, startrekfan wrote:
> *squid3 Version 3.4.8* is deployed in the Jessie stable repository.*This
> version is outdated and has some security risks!!*. Version 3.5 is more
> secure but unfortunately it's only marked as unstable
I wonder how many times this question should be asked
24.12.2024 17:10, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On 12/24/24 18:54, Michael Tokarev wrote:
The no-unsafe-io workaround in dpkg was needed for 2005-era ext2fs
issues, where a power-cut in the middle of filesystem metadata
operation (which dpkg does a lot) might result in in unconsistent
filesystem
Hi!
The no-unsafe-io workaround in dpkg was needed for 2005-era ext2fs
issues, where a power-cut in the middle of filesystem metadata
operation (which dpkg does a lot) might result in in unconsistent
filesystem state. This workaround slowed down dpkg operations
quite significantly (and has been
Hi!
I'd love to have little help with postfix before trixie.
There are 2 open issues which needs fixing, both involving debconf,
and I haven't dealt with debconf before (despite being a long-term
DD), and my time these days is scarce, - so it would be difficult
for me to complete the task before
16.12.2024 20:08, Russ Allbery wrote:
So, I wouldn't object to undoing that given upstream's stance, but maybe
it would be good to do that in conjunction with adding more hardening to
the default configuration with systemd? systemd-analyze security
postfix@- shows a whole lot of things that coul
16.12.2024 20:45, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
What do you think about this aspect of postfix on debian?
I do not remember ever having any issues about this, and I have been
using Postfix since before it was called Postfix. But if Wietse says
that a chroot defau
Hi!
For 25 years, Postfix the MTA in Debian has been setup to run chrooted by
default (that's where most postfix internal components run chrooted in
/var/spool/postfix/, to limit possible system damage after a possible
compromise).
This setup has been criticized for 25 years, because of signific
16.12.2024 20:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
16.12.2024 20:08, Russ Allbery wrote:
So, I wouldn't object to undoing that given upstream's stance, but maybe
it would be good to do that in conjunction with adding more hardening to
the default configuration with systemd? systemd-analyz
17.12.2024 00:31, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 21:21 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
It turns out the reason for this is a myth, which we believed to for
25 years - a myth that "On FreeBSD, chroot is painless, but on Linux,
chroot never works and is only suitable for the one
18.12.2024 16:16, Simon Richter wrote:
Postfix's "master" process effectively implements an orchestrator for a microservice architecture, similar to what systemd does. This could be
replaced by systemd by writing a generator that creates units from master.cf.
Simply converting the default mast
17.12.2024 00:31, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
Anyway, systemd's hardening features are so easy and effective that I
would really like to see not only postfix, but ALL services use them as
much as possible. Why we still have major packages like nginx shipping
without any hardening out-of-the-box?
I wo
24.01.2025 04:06, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
I would be curious to hear why people are *not* adopting 'debian/latest'?
Why does the majority of Debian packages still use 'master' or
'debian/master' branch as the main development branch?
For me it's 3 things.
1. "debian/*" is just more to type th
22.12.2024 10:24, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Hi Michael and Simon,
Hello Helmut! :)
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:16:12PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
If they were to ship unit files, they'd end up in the same documentation
..
I'm not sure the generator approach needs to be ruled out that quickly.
02.01.2025 03:00, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
Sure but I wouldn’t know how to do that since I’m calling apt and
force-unsafe-io seems to be a dpkg option ?
echo force-unsafe-io > /etc/dpkg/dpkg.conf.d/unsafeio
before upgrade.
/mjt
65 matches
Mail list logo
