On 13.08.2012 00:50, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 12, Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote:
> 
>> Not good.  Time to look a bit more seriously at mdev then?
> Waste of time, mdev lacks critical features like modules autoloading so 
> it is laughable to argue that it is a credible udev replacement for 

It is laughable to argue that module autoloading is any more complex
than a call to `modprobe $MODALIAS'.

Thanks,

/mjt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5029859c.2090...@msgid.tls.msk.ru

Reply via email to