Sean,
sounds really good. How do your scripts relate to the db management
scripts provided by wwwconfig-common, maintained by Ola Lundqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
I suspect your package should be either supercede wwwconfig-common or
be rolled into it.
cheers,
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:28:39 -0500, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my code is a superset of what's done in wwwconfig-common.
That sounds great! thanks for your work on this front. I'll be reading
your doco in more detail, as I have to sort out the path forward for
twig...
martin
--
On 1/15/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for
> people who can't understand sarcasm?
debian-announce is not meant to play games. Someone made a (perhaps
honest) mistake, and were duly criticised. But you know the rules.
I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
subscribers are usually pretty clued-in and interested. Perhaps it is
the natural place to discuss web-apps? At least until traffic is
sufficient that the Debian A
On 7/2/05, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-01 23:34]:
> > > and we are doing a sociological survey on Debian in order to
> > > better understand the Debian community.
> >
> > didn't tbm do some research into this?
>
> Yes and no. There is cu
On 9/9/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using noatime for quite awhile now. mount(8) does not
mention nodiratime anywhere, and I have never used it.
Same here. But googling for nodiratime shows it's definitely in the
kernel, and in wide use. Learned something today...
c
On 5/29/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, what do we do if the central people don't show up? It's been
known to happen at KSPs.
Put more than one in each subgroup, and have a coordinator ready to
shift the central people around if a given subgroup is really
orphaned. Or split
On 8/19/05, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd love to see people migrating to Arch
Being a long-time Arch user, let me tell you that Arch has been
orphaned upstream. Currently baz is the only version being developed,
and it's unclear for how long, as Canonical has their eyes on
On 8/21/05, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm quite confident that there will be an upgrade path from Arch archives to
> bzr archives. Canonical, amongst other people, have too much invested in
> Arch to just let that history fester. As for hct, I understand it is a
> wrapper fronte
On 8/20/05, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> > arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> > Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
To which I'd respond
On 8/31/05, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does git aide you in identifying the differences in changes
> > between two trees?
George's got it right. In practice, I normally use gitk --all, or use
cogito thus:
cg-log -r onebranch:otherbranch
cg-diff -r onebranch:otherbran
On 8/31/05, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for the record, to avoid other folk getting confused - bzr isn't a
> 'patch orientated SCM'. bzr's design incorporates elements from all of
> the VCS systems around when the project was started (and updated since
> then) - its not derived from
Hi Kees, Jamie, DDs,
I am looking at hosts that are runing other linuxen that may have weak
keys now, or see those weak keys uploaded inadvertently in the future.
Is there a straightforward way to get hosts that are !(Debian|Ubuntu)
to use that blacklist? PermitBlacklistedKeys support in openssh-
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clint Adams wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:35:20PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>> Wrong. You neglected to request to be CCed.
>>
>> My M-F-T was clearly a request to be Cc'd.
>
> Which possibly only goes to show how broken t
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because I've configured all of the above, and *still* get individual
> copies of messages that were sent to the list. I'm not subscribed to
> the Debian mailing lists, so there is no "duplicate" that can be
> detected by such
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not interested in receiving them in my email. I participate in the
> Debian mailing lists via a non-email interface, which makes it much
> more manageable. (For me, that is. I don't expect everyone to follow
> my habits i
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think everyone involved did a wonderful job, especially given the
> appalling constraints they were under. There is a difference, though,
> between acknowledging the excellent work that was done and burying one's
> head i
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> -- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network protocol
>> that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
>
> This is actually your best argument so far, but I don't think it's
> completely true either.
Yes
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
> will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
> someone who didn't read it)
There are lots of people who pick a license without close reading.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not
>> a webapp, what then?
>
> please see this:
>
&g
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NW> Because it is in the documentation, not the script. Didn't you read the
> NW> reply? It is not a route of attack, it is AN EXAMPLE in the
> NW> documentation!
> This script marked as executable.
> User can start i
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm very dissappointed with this, to be honest.
Agreed - devel-announce is for, um, project announcements. Not a jokes
list. And with the large and varied group of users and developers
Debian has, tact and tolerance are a go
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1: Thankfully, it hasn't been required yet
>
> I am confused:
it might be a small misunderstanding. 'Required' is not the same as
'requested' in English (though they are in some latin languages).
Steve McIntyre has
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Manners, Josselin, and discretion. There are some places where it's just
> not appropriate to blurt out whatever you're thinking.
+10 from here.
Of course, Josselin thinks and jokes differently from others, as it's
natural to do. When in a
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Homosexuality can be an *accusation* ‽
It still is in some countries. That's why mature people don't play
with that openly in international projects.
Perhaps you didn't know.
cheers,
martin
--
martin.langh...@gmail.com
mar...@lapto
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Our country is very far from exempt of human rights violations. Those
> trying to frame the current discussion in terms of cultures or countries
> are forgetting that every culture and country has its share of
> intolerant people. I don't
Hi Andre,
I would suggest using most of the ideas outlined in
http://infrastructures.org/ - though the text on the website is a bit
dated, you can manage a large infrastructure of 50K systems combining
the conceptual framework laid out by Steve Traugott, with Debian tools
and modern configuration
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Adding HOWTOs
>> to README.Source is IMHO not worth the overhead it produces on the
>> maintainer's side. Every R user knows (well, should know) how to deal
>> with those files.
>
> Yes, but you can not assume that ftpmaster is an R *user* n
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:57:38 +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Fluendo guys have a nice track record of providing high-quality
> media streaming of Free Software conferences using Free codecs, e.g. at
> GUADEC (GNOME conference) and AKademy (KDE conference). Maybe we could
> team
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If jed can deal with files that large, sure. But if it expects to be
> able to load the entire file into memory - as most text editors do -
> stat() will be only the first of its problems.
Old vi was able to work with files larger than avail
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jon Dowland
wrote:
> only to say that "this is really just applying a patch, no need to panic".
How about defaulting to assume if the maintainer hasn't posted,
there's no reason to panic. Assume the maintainer knows better than
slashdot or reddit about his/her own
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> - VIA C3 before Nehemiah and
> - National Semiconductor Geode (GXm, GXLV, GX1 and GX2).
That affects XO-1 hardware being manufactured now, and C3s are among
the viable CPUs for low cost, low dissipation "school server" style
hardware.
On th
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> This is a summary of last month's thread about the feasibility of
> removing support for /usr on a standalone filesystem.
>
> The issue was raised by the udev upstream maintainer along with the udev
> package maintainers of the major distribut
33 matches
Mail list logo
