On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Toni Mueller <t...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff > <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not >> a webapp, what then? > > please see this: > > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AGPLv3InteractingRemotely > > It could eg. also be network file system software (NFS, AFS, SMB, > etc.).
Yes, I am aware of that. What I was trying to say is "how do we comply, then?" >> That would be complying with the spirit of the license, but not the >> actual clause AFAICS. > > Ok. I'd say that this should have been an oversight in the formulation > of the license, but maybe consulting the original discussions when the > license was in the making, could be enlightening. Yes, it will help us understand the spirit better. But we are looking at what the license actually says. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
