Como consigo lista de mails de uruguay y/o del
mundo?
Como te lo pago?
Soy de paysandu uruguay
soundserver, though. Is that
| okay with you?
Yes, please. I'm already in Stuttgart, but I don't think I'll get my hands on
a Debian box very soon... I'm in the middle of a Silicon sea :-)
(perhaps it's time to give that MIPS port a second look :)
Thanks,
e architecture
hasn't buildd support for t-p-u, the buildd support for t-p-u is as
good as missing. You could do builds by hand, but then again, how many
developers actually do that? And it "only" takes a mail to the admin
team ("please install build dependencies for foo in bar").
Marcelo
hat can
> easily be recognized and memorized, and the wish to have a name that,
> if it isn't unique, at least makes it possible to distinguish the
> program from others: Not only in a technical sense, but in human
> language.
Yes, that's fine and that's what .app and .bundle are for.
Marcelo
be OK to move to FHS 2.3 in
> Etch.
Isn't the configuration file used by the X.org server called something
else? (It's rather silly to hardcode the name of a configuration file
used by a specific vendor)
Marcelo
CPU) resources for a few dozen
> rsyncs.
And shouldn't this be left as a decision for the mirror administrators?
It's not like setting up a mirror _automatically_ allows rsync access
to it, isn't it?
Marcelo
to take
into account to that ~/ is not unusually a shared resource.
Marcelo
k:
if test -z "$GNUSTEP_USER_ROOT" ; then
if test -d "$HOME/GNUstep" ; then
GNUSTEP_USER_ROOT="$HOME/GNUstep"
else
GNUSTEP_USER_ROOT="$HOME/.GNUstep"
fi
but I have the same interoperatibility problem again. This deviates
from the upstream default behaviour.
Marcelo
hat's what it takes.
This project is making a custom out of threating developers like crap.
Marcelo
bad?
> 3. Go to debian-curiosity with mails which do not belong to
> debian-devel.
debian-curiosa is neither a garbage dump nor a place where you can
badmouth other people, as some folks seem to think, and the hot-babe
thread really has no place there.
Marcelo
[0] Completely OT: I
se there's no direct visual feedback.
The other problem with aptitude is touted as a design feature: it tends
to be all-or-nothing. Either you use it always or you don't (automatic
removal thingie). This becomes a problem when multiple persons use
different interfaces for adding and removing packages to the system.
Marcelo
tiple
> > persons use different interfaces for adding and removing packages
> > to the system.
>
> You exaggerate.
I do not. I've seen aptitude remove "unwanted" packages more than a
couple of times because of this.
It's a cool feature, yes. It's also a design bug.
Marcelo
ne , being a
BIOS, a certain chipset, a certain controller, a certain graphics card,
or whatever else you wish.
Darn! That's all of them.
IMO we have to draw the line at some point that's *useful* and
*practical*. Committing suicide is neither of those. I think the
proposal that spawned this subthread is both.
Marcelo
. (And no
"we will release in two years time" is not a release schedule in this
context).
Marcelo
point people to. Ride on that wave. Debian's
problem, seen from the inside (you don't have to give a damn about what
the Slashdot crowd says), is that we let that wave break, and there
isn't another one coming behind it.
Marcelo
[0] Besides learning that there is still p
es
not give *developers* this. And users get frustrated each time they
see a Debian 3.0rX come out, but no sarge in sight.
I do get your point and I'm not saying that it is easy (or even
possible!) to stick to a faster release schedule, but refusing it
upfromt without trying does not help.
Marcelo
ht to hear the jokes I get to hear once a month on the local
LUG meetings. Oh dear, next meeting is this saturday.
Marcelo
t for some people (and I still want to know
about concrete examples where this is true and why), how about 9
months? How about 1 year? My point is: set a goal and try to
accomplish it.
Marcelo
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:46:00PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 08:22:47PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > We don't have to go from X.0 to (X+1).0 in 6 months. It's
> > perfectly ok to go from X.0 to X.1.
>
> .1 Releases
$cfg{"d$_"}{incoming} =~ s/0(?=-day)/$_/;
}
foreach my $t (keys %cfg)
{
foreach my $d (keys %{$cfg{'defaults'}})
{
$cfg{$t}{$d} = $cfg{'defaults'}{$d} unless exists $cfg{$t}{$d};
}
}
1;
I made this up on the spot, you can keep it if it breaks.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eing processed?
Or are we again in the usual "I'll process any package that I feel like
processing" situation?
Marcelo
PS: "blah, blup, release, blah, sarge" ... spare it, *please*.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ll have this thing
called debian-devel-announce, you know?
Did I miss a memo?
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
case. And I've been not following it for
several years and across several releases now.
Better?
Marcelo
PS: And just to answer your question, I get the impression that I'm
"on" stuff much milder than you usually are, coffee being the
strongest, and tea the usual.
1.
1.
1.
ie the file pointed to by the --add-gnu-debuglink can be the full
executable. It does not have to be a file created by the
--only-keep-debug switch.
--
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e that we wouldn't have told people about it via
> debian-devel-announce, y'know?
Whilst no insult was meant, it _still_ _looks like_ a silent decision.
My apologies if insult was taken,
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
pardon me for the delay, I really have better things to do that getting
involved all day long in discussions with purposely obtuse people.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:30:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:21:02AM +1000
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:17:51AM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 06:03:04PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > * it's not ftp-master's business to judge on _technical_ merits of
> >the pacakge (bad packaging practices, missing depe
self ;-) (no, really,
I want to learn package building, and it's easier to figure out the
not-so-obvious-right-now problems this way)
Marcelo Magallón
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
lation-architecture
i386
> Is there an easy way to do this? (Also, if pentium clones also work
> with the ecgs compiled packages, maybe i586 is better than pent.)
I think it should be i586, although I'm not clear if ecgs supports Kx et
al. It should...
Marcelo
or the FlashPoint... and I think
many people on that list may be influenced by that recommendation, too.
Is this going to change soon... I mean, 2.0 is still months away, and it
kind of scares me to think of many users facing "way till 2.0"
Marcelo
--
TO UNSU
ask in the gtk list, where it seems to work for most people
according to you, which libraries and what versions are they using? (a
listing from */lib and /etc/ld.conf would help, I think)
later,
Marcelo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
s wouldn't impact
mirrors much. (Carefully = don't just compile i586 optimized code because
it's possible)
Marcelo.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
here, a good deal of which are icons.
Is that policy? Gnome puts the pixmaps in /usr/share/pixmaps, and
according to my interpretation of FSSTD/FHS, gnome's practice is better.
Marcelo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
my name is Marcelo Magallón, and I'd like to take over the
maintainance of wmaker, since there are several bugs against wmaker, in
particular a mixed dependencies bug. I have tried to contact the current
maintainer, Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL P
#x27;ve been fine tunning the package, and it's usable now ;-) Be sure to
read README.debian (Ok, ok, I have to work on the documentation)
Marcelo.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> wmaker-0.6.3-1 (Mixed dependencies)
>
> Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on
> WindowMaker packages based on wmaker-0.12.3.
Yes. I have them ready, an
thing is not that amazing. The patches that
modulize sound are there, and seem to be a good thing, but documentation
is lacking.
Marcelo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
his minute,
but it's going pretty slow. Anyway, I hope the packages get to master
before the day's over... ;-)
I've tried to contact Neil about this, but I have had no luck.
Marcelo.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > I have already done that. It's not 0.6.3 but 0.12.3. This [...]
>
> Well, that's great! But what I intend to fix is afterstep, not
> wmaker... ;)
Oops... I read way too fast... Then both packages are fixed! :-)
Marcelo
x27;d like to upload
that, too.
There's also an upgrade for libtool, that fixes a couple of annoying
things about 1.0c. It's version 1.0h, but the GNU people have a big
warning about it being alpha software (1.0c is alpha, too, I think). Is
this ok for hamm, or is it better to put it
[I have tons on old mail to read, but it seems something's going on here ;-)]
On Sat, 4 Apr 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is a partial list of http enabled mirrors, I did the US and UK.
> There are 13 sites listed here. If someone would like to go through the
> rest of the mirror list then
d to care. :-(
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vg/bug = 200 MB, possibly more)
Marcelo
[1]
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ma/l,mmagallo,debian.org,Marcelo_E._Magallon.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please bring it up on -policy
joey> again.
Ok, I'm enclosing the same message I posted to policy a while
ago. It's long. It's intent is to show the behaviour of the
linker.
Marcelo
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 20:24:52 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: PW#5-7: Linking
not the man.
> Why not call for graphics from the web site like when we were
> looking for a logo ? That's all.
you may want to take a look at login.app, that just uploaded.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote:
> I wish to become a package maintainer, I stubbled across
> several really nice applications. They are xfont3d and
> xfpovray.
Can you provide an URL? What do these apps do?
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
ne with
X, one without. Use alternatives to manage the whole thing.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 11:11:12PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I was just setting up a new install and ran into the problem of wmaker
> configuring itself before /etc/X11/window-managers existed, it's postinst
> bombed.
This was reported as a bug, and it is fixed on 0.14.1-4, is it not?!? (I
y), and
I better get some coffee because I'm talking non-sense.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ble because a situation like the one I just described is not
desirable.
Marcelo
pgp1uOI4q5Z7D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tial part of the disc
that are not usable, but I don't know if that's already counted
on the 650 MB figure.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s there a way to tell
the connection speed? Once on IRC I told Manoj to use $PPP_SPEED on
the ip-up/ip-down scripts, but he pointed out that that didn't report
the connection speed but the maximum speed on the line.
Is there a way out of this, or is this a case by case problem?
Thanks,
On Sat, May 02, 1998 at 08:12:35AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> > As you can see chat breaks the CONNECT line. Is there a way to tell
> > the connection speed?
>
> 'ATW2' will make the modem (or at least, my modem) emit somethin
helpful to be able to take a quick look at the
number of bugs (and how closely related they are or not) a package has.
Since I already get this on my inbox, it would be nice to have it sorted by
packge.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
it's uploaded as a package and
that a big "THIS IS A *GUIDE*" banner be stamped on it. The last thing
I want is people complaining that libfoo doesn't follow some chapter
and verse of said guide under the impression that it is somehow
"correct", "standard&qu
n and I'm still burned out by it. I
recall vividly how I had to waste much time to convince you that there
was a problem with libpng in the first place and then even more time to
get you to understand what the proper solution was. I really have no
intention of rehashing that chapter.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thing different (with added parts, and
incidentally, one of them is the original thing)
I got an announcement from Freshmeat that said GNU Mirror, and I thought
the licence was changed over to GPL... but isn't this one the same (close)
to the one Pine uses?
M
came up regarding the download
metrics: all architectures are equal, but some are more equal than
others. You can't compare 16 i386s to a single sparc with 16
processors with such a metric.
--
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ility was reported. Each time you
have to wonder if it really doesn't apply to PHP3 or if noone bothered
to look.
--
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ver the package I'll be happy with that.
Please drop me a note off-list letting me know that.
Thanks,
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y incompatible with each
> > other.
>
> Powerpc does not define any hwcaps, too.
Thanks for the help!
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have the time, hardware and desire to do so, you can compile the
mesa package (there's a debian/README.build there) and if you find any
significant advantage I'll gladly include any required change.
Mesa is stuck in incoming atm.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
s accessed multiple times (and it's not present,
isn't that a race? what happens if the file suddenly appears in the
middle of program start up? what's that file anyway, I can't find it
mentioned in the documentation).
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e a valid reason for "wanting" the file to
suddenly pop up while the program is running.
> I think this is safer than checking /etc/ld.so.nohwcap once in
> program startup time.
Safer in what way?
Again, I just don't buy that "system calls are too expensive&qu
the strace of a process keeps readable in finite time, so do
> system administrators with auditing turned on.
I can understand that. I'm just not sure what's to fix in the first
place.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sn't even mention the variable!
Either you *bump* into LD_DEBUG=help by chance or go RTFS, which is,
quite appropriately, also badly documented.
But it's fine, don't bother to reply, you certainly have better things
to do than justify backward designs and weird decisions which are
probably not yours to begin with.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
once, and *he* asked me to submit
reports to the corresponding bugs and, iirc, mark them fixed. But in that
situation I had permission from the maintainer, which is a good thing.
Marcelo
ato on a slink system, all the
dependencies are met.
Marcelo
Request.1 is X_CreateWindow. X_InternAtom is
XRequest.16... aggghhh! There's a XCreateWindow a few lines
before the call to XInternAtom, but none of the documented reasons
for a BadMatch generated by XCreateWindow are met.
Help? Anyone?
Marcelo
ort as editing a text file, signing and
uploading) and provide the functionality of task-packages, provided
UI tools support this field.
One problem here is that sooner or later someone will start thinking
of such sick things as 'local overrides'.
Marcelo
naive non-tetris-fan
experience suggests people who like tetris would like this game. But
my naive non-tetris-fan experience is turned into nothingness after
seeing what tetrinet is.
Cheers,
Marcelo
o
be forced to take a two week and one day vacation in order for their
packages in unstable to get two weeks old.
/me ducks!
Marcelo
WNPP system.
Marcelo Work-Needing and Prospective Packages, WNPP for short, is a pseudo
package on the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS) and its intention is to
track closely the real status of such things as prospective packages in
Debian and packages in need of new maintainers. Si
>> "Oliver M . Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # BTW, is there any docu on how to properly operete the new WNPP ?
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Marcelo
ether the person
*actually creating* it feels confortable enough with the tools
provided.
No tool is inherently wrong for a given task, and this specially true
when you are talking about graphics production. I know a guy who
used to sketch portraits on his computer. Using a CAD program.
Che
ed it (-:
JFTR: http://www.swift-tools.com/Flash/
It's GPLed.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ares
about, which in turn means bugreports won't get answered to. IMO,
they *should* be removed before release. Counter-arguments for the
general case are welcomed.
Thanks,
Marcelo
[1] http://qa.debian.org/documentation/qa.html/ch-rules.html
The f
L PROTECTED]>
Package: hugs-doc
Maintainer: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
please do retitle bugs 68186 and 68187 if you are taking over these
packages. See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Thanks,
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
>> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > mpsql (68054), 33 days old
>
> How on earth did this make it onto your list. I cannot remeber orphaning it
> at all.
please do close b
Hi,
>> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > please do close bug #68054 if the package is no longer up for
^^
> >
ather agressive at that IMO.
Amazed,
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone checked the temperature in Hell lately?
Not really, but I hope Therese enjoyed it...
Marcelo,
making obscure references to an endothermic hell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d. And has been for about 7 months. The "maintainer"
should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that.
Marcelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/charities.cron/
>
> I'll look at it and make a package, unless someone really objects...
Fix the tmp security hole while you are at it, will you?
Thanks,
--
Marcelo
ion to
> > experimental until they are fixed and a new maintainer for them has been
> > found?
>
> tetex depends on dpkg-perl.
The WNPP report included backwards dependencies, until
Packages-all-non-msdos-names (or whatever the name was) went poof. I
haven't had the time to hook things to the new database.
--
Marcelo
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please close bug#81180 as appropiate.
--
Marcelo
LEASE remove the files from *.d.o machines?
Thanks,
Marcelo
PS: go to http://xmps.sourceforge.net/, try to find the link to these
win32 codecs there.
because of what I think of DivX, but because such an
installer is specifically designed to aid in the distribution of
material that is potentially illegal and nothing else.
--
Marcelo
distribute his package or whatever this
> means.
As long as mplayer doesn't *require* DivX to work, it should be safe.
For example, xine can *use* the Windows DLLs, but it doesn't require
them. I guess mplayer is in similar position.
--
Marcelo
y get a friendly
message thanking you for the reminder and possibly a package within 24
hours.
In other words: stop pestering Myth about a new mozilla package unless
you want to have a package next year.
--
Marcelo
sting_ CVS repository which is being managed with cvs-buildpackage
to SVN, but I'd appreciate other tips.
TIA,
Marcelo
his high priority question if, by the look of it, only a
handful of people would care? This is release-note worthy or handbook
worthy, but it's not really the kind of thing Average Joe wants to see
when installing Debian afresh[0], is it?
Small request: please run that text thru our English l1
;s a thousand better things to do with your time (hint:
fixing bugs) other than nitpicking at changelog entries because they
don't include the last period and last comma you want them to.
This changelog-policying camp is becoming very very counter-productive.
Marcelo
al benefit of not annoying this
> mailing-list.
By all means.
Marcelo
series was sent through ATI), and
> they have the standing offer I mentioned above. The only thing
> preventing capital-F-Free drivers being written right now is DRI
> developer time constraints, AIUI.
That's right.
Marcelo
akup-cvs
The epoch is necessary if you really want people to "upgrade" from the
old CVS package to the new stable package. I see the package was not
present in woody, so it's not a problem for people upgrading across
Debian releases.
Marcelo
ng new upstream sources?
A few small attempts at this exploded in my face... but this was some
months ago, so things might have changed in the meantime.
Marcelo
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:35:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:31:42PM +0200, Attila SZALAY wrote:
>
> > What can I do with this (from packages.qa.debian.org):
> >
> > # 42 days old (needed 10 days)
> > # out of date on hppa: libzorpll, libzorpll-dev (from 2.0.
claiming it's perfect. It's just better than before,
this time you have the chance that you don't want your local
modifications overwritten at seemingly random times.
My point is that given the way the question is written, its priority
and default answer seem to counter its purpose.
Marcelo
crossing t's. this is information
> that is inherent to a changelog; and writing poer changelogs must be
> encouraged.
Sure. You are welcomed to use @packages.debian.org for that.
Marcelo
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
