vailable to TeX documents. It would be
possible, but quite complicated, using defoma.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signatur
the python dependency. Build-depending on
python (>= 2.3) will ensure older versions of python won't be used to
build the package.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECT
all a derivative work. Whether it is linked to it using ELF or
not is irrelevant.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
or to install acpid (if you are using a 2.6 kernel), so that CPU
idle calls are correctly done.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
sig
k whether any of these *had* -dev packages?! A lot
> of them would be bogus bugs.
If there is no -dev package, there is probably no need for a .pc file
either.
--
Josselin Mouette /\./\
pouet
. Then again, maybe it will be useful to others too.
Indeed, packaging such a small script seems a bit overkill.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
t bring value to your sayings.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
of libdvdcss with the cracking features disabled,
only being able to read your drive's zone DVDs?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of fre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: simnazi
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Chris Statzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://simnazi.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : historical city simulation game, clone of Sim City
SimNazi i
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2004 à 01:23 +0100, Alexander Schmehl a écrit :
> Did anyone mentioned "overkill" yet? Okay, it's not a FPS but it's
> quite bloody (according to the package description).
There is also xbill, which is quite popular - or at least used to.
--
ng.
Then maybe we could research whether this material is questionable at
all. It's not as if hot-babe contained pr0n pictures.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian
r these developers to have a policy-compliant changelog
without having their uploads considered as NMUs is to encode the control
file in UTF-8.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- D
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2004 à 14:23 +0100, Jonas Meurer a écrit :
> > There's no excuse for censorship, ever.
>
> so you would even accept nazi propaganda material in debian, just
> because you dislike censorship?
You're being late for invoking the Godwin law.
--
te to write the English text in latin1 and the japanese
> text in euc-jp ?
> Let's make it clear: 1 text file, 1 encoding.
Well, it's already the case for the generated localized debconf template
files. Not that I believe it is a good thing...
--
.''`.
e included?
Not necessarily.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
tainers, more work for
the users, and no gain.
In fact, all these drivers (including ipw2x00) should be built with our
kernel, and the binary firmwares that we can ship should be included in
the non-free section.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
ribute. If we distribute a package that cannot do
anything without a non-free part which cannot be in Debian, it should go
in contrib. If we distribute a package that mostly works, but provides
added functionality when some non-free stuff is installed (e.g. read
realplayer or WMV9 files), it can go int
Le samedi 11 décembre 2004 à 13:45 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> Please continue your argument on debian-legal. NOT HERE.
Why should this go on debian-legal? I think the legal status and
DFSG-freeness of these firmwares is pretty clear.
--
.''`. Jos
course it is. This is about how to deal with this situation,
technically speaking.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature
either by downloading it from our
non-free archive, either by installing it by himself.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.as
icial means to move the driver from contrib to
main. But this is how it should be done: it makes the life easier for
users, and it doesn't compromise the social contract.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
ian on this
hardware without such a compromise, this becomes completely stupid.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Des
> use -- which is already not something it has a fantastic reputation
> for -- and thereby its popularity.
If we gain popularity but lose freedom, we'll die in the end. If someone
really wants to run Debian (or Linux in general), he can buy some
supported hardware.
ITP for libxbox0 for more information about what libxbox
> provides. (Bug#285617)
Why do you need to make it a separate source package?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU
propagate to sarge?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ep.
Why in the world would you then want to install a metapackage if its
selection doesn't suit you?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of fre
at you spat your flames on
this thread, I cannot hope to have any answer to the questions raised.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
; MUA.)
Mail-Followup-To is not part of any of the standards defining e-mail
protocols.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
unately, I don't have such a machine, and I don't know
of an available i386 project machine.
Are there some people here who'd be interested, or who could point me to
available resources? If not, do you have other ideas to make debugging
packages easily available?
--
.'
a lot of benefits, and that's why dh_strip now supports it,
but I'm afraid this is irrelevant to the issue I'm talking about.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C-ing the fontconfig
developers, in case they have a clue.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
(Also note that Mr Dodds' mail server is on crack and refused mail from
my SMTP for a mysterious reason; that's why you didn't receive my reply
in private.)
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
ISP's mailserver; or because your mailserver allows
forwarding.
I'm not using my ISP's mail server, and I am the sole user of this
server for outgoing mail. Please fix this.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `&
Greg Folkert wrote:
What about the Packages for mplayer that Christian Marillat has been
providing for years?
Have you even discussed this with him?
Hrm, you don't know him, do you? Otherwise you wouldn't be suggesting to
discuss with him.
--
.''`.
d, scalable and modular
> email services, targetted to satisfy all ISP needs.
Does it comply with RFC 1149?
Also, having "open", "free", and "GPL" in the description seems a bit
redundant. On the other side, what "email services"
nd install it in a few
seconds. If you don't know what theme you want, you'll have to install
all of them and test them. That's when a single package becomes handy.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ure that
nothing will break, so I'd like some more opinions. Cc-ing the lists,
maybe someone will have more clues.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Le vendredi 18 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 08:37 -0600, Steve Greenland a Ãcrit :
> No where in the Debconf note does it say which is "the upstream way".
This has nothing to do in a debconf note.
> And does it default to "one big file"?
Yes.
--
.'
Le vendredi 18 février 2005 à 14:15 -0600, Steve Greenland a écrit :
> On 18-Feb-05, 09:06 (CST), Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 18 f??vrier 2005 ?? 08:37 -0600, Steve Greenland a ??crit :
> > > No where in the Debconf note does it say wh
ly thinks of his own needs, thus a correct wording
would be "pick A if you don't care". However the current wording is even
better; the question isn't even asked at high priority, and the single
file method is silently chosen.
--
.''`.
Le lundi 28 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 13:47 -0800, Hans Reiser a Ãcrit :
> Can you folks at Debian tell me whether we are supported in Sarge?
As far as I know, there is no reiser4 support in the Debian stock
kernel.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
in advance!
I'm using it with fontconfig, just have a look at the rules file.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
s
ng in various and random problems. To avoid that, shouldn't the
kernel-image packages for 2.6 depend on alsa-base?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux --
Le vendredi 04 mars 2005 à 15:29 +0100, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
> > for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
> > resulting in various and rand
feel we
shouldn't release in this state after having spent so much efforts in
hardware detection.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of fr
gt; windows.
Describing how the code is small si sure some fun, but is this package
really useful for something? As described, it sounds just like one more
random window manager nobody cares for.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `
Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 Ã 11:53 +0100, Thomas Hood a Ãcrit :
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:20:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > As long as the linux26 installation ends up with both sound modules
> > loaded, that's a bug that needs to be fixed, though. Another option
> >
Le lundi 07 mars 2005 à 00:03 +0100, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:41:27PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get
> > alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a
installed when ALSA modules are
present.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Le lundi 07 mars 2005 Ã 12:53 -0600, Steve Greenland a Ãcrit :
> On 07-Mar-05, 11:06 (CST), Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And the workaround we use for this bug is to blacklist one module when
> > two of them provide the same functionality. The blacklist
ly against
between -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic:
gcc -o something foo.o bar.o -lsystemlib -Wl,-Bstatic -lownlib -lthirdpartylib
-Wl,-Bdynamic -lpthread
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAI
good solution. The questions now are
whether the kernel maintainers want to do this, and whether this is
feasible before the release. Kernel maintainers, could you say a word
about that issue?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`.
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005 Ã 00:12 +0100, Thomas Hood a Ãcrit :
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:40:40 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split
> > out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules.
>
>
> I raised thi
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005 à 08:17 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> The kernel could blacklist alsa modules by default and the alsa-base
> would divert that to blacklist oss. That sounds the simplest.
It isn't possible to divert files in /etc.
--
.''`.
iped within debhelper
> for such reasons
And other scripts, like dh_python, that are shipped within debhelper
despite of needing extra build dependencies.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EM
rectly into the
> presentation. The package has been based on the prosper class
> but offers a lot of new possibilities and some bug fixes.
Is it compatible with prosper? If it is, maybe it would be better to
simply replace the prosper package with this version.
--
.''`. J
r me, a bit
> > too much and I have no strong motivation for xscreensaver.
>
> Just asking, since somebody would have to do it.
Don't take this as a promise to take it over, but I'll see what I can
do.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :'
d0503&L=ha-prosper&F=&S=&P=777
>
> So in my opinion it would be useful to provide a debian package of
> ha-prosper.
If TeXciting isn't likely to be released soon, that makes the point of
making a separate package from prosper moot, doesn't it?
--
.&#
Sennerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
planner
James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gramps
Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rcalc
Debian QOF packaging team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnotime
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
ay I recall that you have received numerous help proposals
for this package during the last two years and that you ignored all of
them?
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
es, which aren't
easily distinguishable from others. I've seen users not understanding
why installing gnome-session doesn't bring a complete, working, GNOME
"session", and I'm afraid your naming scheme will lead to similar
issues.
Regards,
--
.
internals know whether he has to install tetex-base,
texlive-latex-base or texlive-foobar-stuff ? Worse, how can he know what
Debian package to install when a .sty is missing? Will it be in
texlive-math-extra, texlive-latex-recommended or texlive-formats-extra?
--
.''
to rely on such tools instead of
increasing it. Most issues of regular Debian users can be solved by
installing the right package. But the problem is how they can know which
package to install.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
gt; That sounds pretty reasonable to me.
It sounds to me more like they are trying to keep both texlive and tetex
in the archive, even in the long term. And *that* doesn't look
reasonable.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
rchive. And this isn't valid only for tetex.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
> What can the people on such a mailing list do about buildd issues?
Set up an alternate buildd network. This may be the only option is the
only buildd administrator isn't able to process requests and still isn't
willing to accept help.
--
.''`. Josselin
s of these
libraries? That would be even cooler ;)
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
was
suggested on these topics haven't lead to any result, because these same
people have simply ignored the suggestions. Can someone tell me when
this nightmare is going to end?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ecause release managers said the same thing just before the
expected sarge release, which was delayed several extra weeks because
the security buildd network wasn't ready?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
e observer
> > would come to.
>
> Where should I best complain for your NM application to be cancelled?
On what grounds?
Oh, and this kind of threat makes me sick. It just feels like, for you,
non-DD contributions are second-class contributions.
--
.''`. Jossel
*shrug*.
Oh right, there is no problem with waiting for 2 months for a keyring
update. "Tout va très bien, Madame la marquise." Haven't you noticed
that while there can be obnoxious persons, most people start to complain
only when things become really unbearable? And believe me or not, but
the way some buildd administrators are treating email requests is not
something acceptable, even for volunteers.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ease manager, and you
deserve credits for doing it instead of letting things rot.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Le samedi 10 décembre 2005 à 11:51 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:56:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > How many developer resignations will you need to understand inaction
> > from people at key positions sucks the fun out of things in a worse
s ready here, this is a social
issue, not a technical one.
> -probably tons of details which, alone, aren't a big deal...but will
> make the difference at the end.
The real work would be to index all these issues and to find where to
fix them. Each problem isn't that hard to solv
ebian specific either.
Some desktop tools doing that exist, but they seriously lack integration
in Debian.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
rse. But if that happened there would be no reason to keep
> > /dev/shm mounted; you would need to use an alternate location.
> There is no reason why it should be moved.
How could anyone know that today?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
couldn't
remove it if the shared memory implementation is changed. Then we'd have
to stick with a stupid filesystem that would require a transition to get
rid of.
Following your line of reasoning, we could put all files in the root
directory. After all, do we real
i is almost as crappy as the standard PHUX
editor be a reason to drop it instead?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
D
Le lundi 19 décembre 2005 à 20:12 +0100, Thomas Hood a écrit :
> Any other defenders of /lib/run? Of /run?
Please go ahead with /run. This has to the right place as no other
proposed location makes sense.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-support
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : None yet
* License : LGPL
Description : automated rebuil
provement of a 586 image over a 486 one being marginal,
they aren't built anymore.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
s
ybe it's a dumb question, but isn't there a way to patch these tools
and/or the freebsd sources so that we can build them with the standard
tools in Debian?
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'
this a bug in the software. It's awkward not to receive some
communications on a bug you submitted.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ns of a device that can be
plugged or unplugged?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
nk we need more packages maintained by Christian Marillat.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
to load your modules by hand,
udev won't prevent you from doing so.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ch and every single package uploaded to unstable
should be of release quality. Otherwise, it should go to experimental.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ng them.
You can now thank pkg-config and libtool.
I'm going to fix this right away, thanks for the report.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linu
ailingLists/ we don't remove
emails from our archives.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 23:58 +0100, Daniel Knabl a écrit :
> @Adrian: already done.
In which case you could have posted the bug number.
> @Marc: the packaging was done with source prepared by dh_make.
Have you actually read Marc's email?
--
.''`.
times
integrated to Ubuntu in an amazingly short amount of time.
This is fair. After all, that's what Free software is about. But I know
for sure that "contributing back to Debian" stuff is 100% talk and 0%
reality.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
ependencies in Recommends:.
A more elegant solution would be to make a separate package for
gconf-sanity-check, but it is only 11K.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
to include
headers from most of their dependencies, it isn't possible to move them
to private dependencies.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
don't get your point.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
OME headers have a spurious tendency to include
headers from most of their dependencies, it isn't possible to move them
to private dependencies.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
lar dependencies cases I have met were
fixable. At first, some of them looked necessary and they required quite
some work, but they were fixable.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL P
on. However, looking at the
list, a vast majority of circular dependencies come from the same source
package. This could be checked e.g. by lintian.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
sh
> > debconf-i18n
>
> These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
> not subject to the circular dependency postinst ordering problems afaik.
Looking at them, I fail to see why debconf-i18n has to depend on
debconf. Wouldn't it possible to just r
o
expensive IMHO.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
ow Ubuntu
> helps the free desktop evolve by leaps and bounds.
I would like to know which GNOME improvements you are talking about. To
my knowledge, there are much more improvements going from Debian to
Ubuntu than the other way around.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
:
1 - 100 of 1972 matches
Mail list logo
