HXC wrote:
I also wondered what the community finds about the colours and layout
used for the website Does it need to be upgraded? Do find a new layout
or other colours more appealing? If so what do you have in mind? Or do
you think the current theme is just fine?
The current theme and colors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-03 19:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:18:46PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> No it's not. The principal goal of testing is to evaluate what would
>>> be our next stable if we tried to release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-03 22:26, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 21:06 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
>> As I've understood it so far, testing is for 'people trying to help the
>> developers by testing the softw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 14:09, Riku Voipio wrote:
> ...for a certain subclass of _powerusers_ who are willing to
> walk through a minefield[1] using buggy software. For more typical
> endusers, buggy and unreliable software is a just big source of
> frustration.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-03 19:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It depends of your definition of usable. I don't think it's usable on
> a daily basis because:
FWIW, let the users decide what they use or want to use. I took a curde
estimate by counting what the reader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 16:11, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> [1] search +testing +lenny on
The searches were performed without the '+' to have 'testing or lenny' etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 16:31, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Our packages are free software, so imperfect ones removed from the
> archive can be redistributed in third-party apt repository if there is a
> niche for this. This way, the decisions of removal can be prove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 20:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 juin 2008 à 17:13 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
>>> update-manager
>>> update-notifier
>
> Update-manager *does* have an unfixed RC bug, and the GNOME t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 18:36, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> No it's not. A user that prefers to have broken software rather than
> no software (if the option "non broken" software is absent) should use
> unstable. I mean it.
>
> You can easily use testing by de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
One of my bug reports appears to have been closed by a s_p_a_m mail:
> #325588: kile crashes on auto-save, incurring data loss
>
> It has been closed by "Theron Landers"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reply to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Their expl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-07-03 08:58, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> For unarchiving and un-closing, use the control bot
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I didn't know about the 'unarchive' command.
Thanks, everything is fine now!
Johannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> You do not need to be rude when I explicitly quote the actual doc I am
> reading, which obviously should not recommend the use of chroot
FWIW, this is the wrong mailing list for that kind of question. People
tend to be more helpful, if the correct form and forum/list is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
>> But I also think the acknowledgement mail should contain the information
>> that the submitter is not being subscribed by default and how s/he can
>> subscribe.
>
> IMHO this is very wrong: the user has alrea
Thanks to all!
Many thanks to our release managers and all developers for spending the
past 21 months preparing and releasing Etch!
Etch is a great OS and a great distribution -- to me it's the best
software I ever had. I would switch to something better than debian, but
I know that such a move
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
> following might be an acceptable compromise:
>
> Would you like to participate in the Debian package popularity
> contest meter? Blah blah blah. You may also choose to only
> repor
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:21:09AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
>> The only caveat I can think of (but there might be others) is that it would
>> not be possible to properly count installations that are using
>> corporate (or ISP's) caching proxies (in
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Presently the number of installations reported to popcon is about the
>> same as the number of subscriptions to debian-security-announce, but I
>> am sure there are many users of debian who don't read d-s-a a
On 2008-08-03 18:44, Frank Küster wrote:
> I would like to solve a long-standing bug and finally make TeX aware
> of libpaper and its system-wide paper size setting.
Good!
> However, taking the intersection of paper sizes the different
> program's configuration files accept as default, I end up w
On 2008-08-02 22:28, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 04:48:14PM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:27:10AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
[snip]
So, must these packages pre‐depend on awk?
>
>>> No, but I think we m
On 08/09/2008 03:12 PM, Rudi Effe wrote:
[snip]
> (4) missing eyecandiness: grey and simple icons, no rounded corners,
> dominating dark grey, low percentage of area used for content/
> information (too much frame).
Install gtk-qt-engine and configure it from control centre.
Johannes
$ a
On 08/18/2008 06:08 PM, thacrazze wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> in the Amarok package is a security issue
>
> It is fixed in Amarok 1.4.10
>
> (http://secunia.com/advisories/31418/,
> http://amarok.kde.org/en/releases/1/4/10)
>
> Please update the packages with the fix.
They already have been updated as
On 2008-09-18 19:19, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> while the EULA topic is already being discussed:
Where is it already discussed? At least not on d-d, as far as I can
see/find...
Thanks,
Johannes
NB: Google finds only some ubuntu discussions for me...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
On 2008-09-24 11:50, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> we reached http://bugs.debian.org/50
For the occasion of the 50th Debian bug being reported today, I
couldn't resist digging some statistics from bugs.debian.org.
Out of the 50 bugs reported so far more than 44 thousand bugs
have been fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 07 novembre 2008 à 00:27 +0100, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
>> The problem is, that even if it is mass production since some time, I
>> can not distribute the firmware as open source since it change the
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Being in favor of open-sourcing firmwares (including those controlling
> critical security devices in cars) does not mean being in favor of
> letting anyone ship their own version. In such cases, there needs to be
> some appro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
>>Fortunately for us, at the
>> moment I am not aware of large numbers of highly popular laptops or
>> servers for which non-free firmware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> But anyway, and knowing this is not an Ubuntu list... Does anybody
> know why on Earth is Acroread popular? Why isn't a PDF regularly
> handled in a saner way with Evince (or kde-based lookalike) in some
> distributions?
Zillions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Anyway, I'm probably hugely off topic now. If anyone has experience with
> Free software and PDF annotations I'd love to hear about it, otherwise
> I'll try to find some time to build up the SoC work and see what
> happens.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Didier Raboud wrote:
> Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> You can't get both recent *and* stabilized software. For a solid release
>> to be done, one needs to hold new improvements for a while.
>
> Yes. But there is a bunch of non-DD people that strongly want t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Actually I don’t think we should recommend testing at all to desktop
> users.
Why?
>Except during freeze times, I find unstable to be much more
> usable, and keep testing for (non-production) servers.
IMHO, there i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I'd argue about that "official" thing that people have been using to
> qualify d-d-a. It's an announce list for developers, by
> developers. I'm not sure what's official in there. I'd tend to say
> anything "official" is project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Thursday 18 December 2008 16:37:38 Johannes Wiedersich, vous avez écrit :
>>The point is it was an 'announcement' and it
>> was perceived as inappropriate (not only
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:28:09PM +, Russell Coker wrote:
>> The creation of a fake picture of Manoj wearing leather makes it clear that
>> Joss was intending to make an insinuation of homosexuality in order to
>> offend.
>
> I'm really speechless... I mean, even fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Friday 19 December 2008 01:04:05 Johannes Wiedersich, vous avez écrit :
>> Joss, it is disappointing that after all that time since your faux pas
>> [1], you still seem to fail to understand that what migh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> What slightly upsets me about the issue is not what happened, but rather
>> that the French appear so arrogant as to think what happened on a world
>> wide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I start a discussion trying to explain how misunderstanding can happen and it
> ends up claiming that french are arogant.
I am sorry, if I misunderstood your point as defending Joss's
announcement, while you were just trying t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Merely the number of distinct IP addresses downloading a particular
> popular update from security.debian.org at least once would be
> interesting.
Did you think about thousands of computers having 'private ips' with
some nat
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> The weekend of February 14th is going to be our tentative target for
> release.
Please, don't release before ready, but actually about half an hour
before that date would be more fun:
At 23:31:30 UTC on February 13, 2009, a celebration is expected as the
Unix time number r
David Paleino wrote:
> As someone noted on debian-italian, one second later would be just as cool:
>
> $ factor 1234567891
> 1234567891: 1234567891
>
> (i.e. it's a prime number)
>From my quick check, these events don't seem to be so rare:
$ for i in $(seq 1234567890 $[1234567890+3600]); \
do
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Russ Allbery [2009.06.23.0158 +0200]:
>> Meeting in person and exchanging government ID or something that
>> looks good enough to fool people is a compromise position, but
>> I do think there's a general feeling that it's close to a sweet
>> spot in that tradeo
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> I've reported a bug asking to change a word in the documentation of
> emdebian-rootfs. It's written:
[snip]
> What do you think about that?
Please keep the discussion to the bug report. IIRC there are about
80-100 bug reports reported every day. If all this in
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Very strange logic. BTW AFAIK justice doesn't identify people
> because of ID documents.
It certainly does. Just imagine what will happen if you make yourself
wanted by the authorities and then show your (valid) documents to some
police officers. In case you don't ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
>> The government IDs are relevant because when we're collaborating
>> on an OS where there's minimal code review of the work done by
>> maintainers and a well-chosen malicious package could cause
>> millions or billions of dolla
43 matches
Mail list logo
