mple:
debuild unapply
> My .quiltrc includes this:
>
> QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
>
> So it uses the right directory.
I have found this info at the beginning inside the first dpkg package
with format 3.0 support.
Final: I can work with the new format - but not with quilt
Joey Hess wrote:
> Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > I still use CDBS and I use "simple-patches" - but now without CDBS
> > support. My minor change is the file "patches/series" which let
> > dpkg-buildpackages know that there are patches. This seems very simpl
Hello,
Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> The only missing item for me is: there are no simple command to unapply
> the patches with dpkg-buildpackages (or debuild). For example:
>
>debuild unapply
Even though there are some newer Mails this question seems to not be
solved.
Is it
(which is the usual case)?
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Wiedorn
* Package name: duply
Version : 1.5.1.4
Upstream Author : Edgar Soldin
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ftplicity/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Bash
Description : easy to use
,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
start with
debuild, then dpkg-source works with the unpatched sources - it doesn't
apply the patches as in format 1.0. Is there a chance that dpkg-source
see the patches and can recognize that they must be applied before run
further?
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
had this case with the package d4x: upstream homepage
is deleted, there is no more upstream development.
My wish: A string like "upstream dead" in debian/watch can say DEHS, the
watch file is o.k. while there is no link.
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
l that all patches are applied. But this is one point. All other
points are advancements.
So let us discuss factually about single points, but without generally
speak evil of the new format 3.0.
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
since some days I noticed that the 'Popularity contest statistics' of
packages are not updated. For example for the package "xfe" the last
value of 'popcon' comes from 2010-04-01.
Does anyone know why?
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
omething that would be worth to be written down?
You need the New-Maintainer (NM) process to become DD.
Details can be found here: http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
l use LiLO for all my systems, I could support the
maintaining of LiLO. Would this a way for you, William?
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
eam development. Everyone
is invited to join in this development. I'm working on LiLO version 23.
Shortly with more informations ...
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Ben Hutchings wrote on 2010-06-19 03:55:
> However, given that route B is present in both lenny and squeeze (and
> even in etch, I think) there is no good reason for packages not to rely
> on it now. (Well, except lack of documentation.) All boot loader
> packages that fall into case 1
Hello,
After the long silence about the popular bootloader LILO the development
was started again.
The new Homepage can be found here:
http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/
For the development of the bootloader I have started an Alioth project
with Git repository and Mailinglist:
http://alioth.debian.
Colin Watson wrote on 2010-06-21 22:22:
> There've been several bootloader-related threads here of late, and
> grub2, lilo, and syslinux all seem to have fairly active work happening
> on them. (For all I know the same may be true of some of the
> bootloaders specific to non-x86 architectures to
Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-06-18 23:48:
> we - the initramfs-tools maintainers in Debian - want to provide a
> solid initramfs-tools version for squeeze. The new release 0.97 is
> expected to fix many longstanding problems. It would be great if we
> could receive feedback from testers.
>
> The
Hello William,
perhaps you have read the recent email from Ben (see below). It would be
important to update the lilo package to support these recent requirements
to prepare LILO for Squeeze before it will get stable.
Do you have the intention to update the lilo package to integrate some
scripts f
Hello,
the first version of the new LILO is released as version 23.0.
The most patches (especially from Debian/OpenSuse/Fedora packages)
are included, which fixes some problems.
The links can be found in the mail below.
Have a nice day,
Joachim (Germany)
Joachim Wiedorn wrote on 2010-06-19
Hello,
Colin Watson wrote on 2010-06-21 22:22:
> There've been several bootloader-related threads here of late, and
> grub2, lilo, and syslinux all seem to have fairly active work happening
> on them. (For all I know the same may be true of some of the
> bootloaders specific to non-x86 architec
Lucas Nussbaum wrote on 2010-12-03 10:36:
> No, sorry. I must admit that I didn't spend any time investigating the
> failures. However, my irssi backlog says the two major changes in Ubuntu
> that could cause failures are:
> - --as-needed is now used by default by the linker
> - python2.7
Many p
Anders Kaseorg wrote on 2011-03-05 04:05:
> I see 4 packages currently in squeeze that declare ‘Pre-Depends: dpkg (>=
> 1.15.7.2)’ (cron e16-data ntp ntpdate) and 9 in sid (apticron ccal cron
> lilo midori mozplugger ntp ntpdate usb-modeswitch), but I can’t find any
> discussion about this on
Hello Daniel,
[the appended logfile wasn't complete!]
Daniel Leidert wrote on 2012-05-17 17:25:
> So why does lintian give me those warnings and how can it be fixed?
I had the same problem with fox1.6. Please check your build log file
wether "-fstack-protector" is really inside.
I had found th
Hello,
Laszlo Kajan wrote on 2012-07-06 18:47:
> HMMER is an implementation of profile hidden Markov model methods for
> sensitive searches of biological sequence databases using multiple sequence
> alignments as queries.
Which software/packages do you use together with this package?
Is ther
David Prévot wrote on 2011-10-06 21:26:
> Sure: “All developers are expected to be subscribed to this list.” [0],
> but Oliver was referring to “users”. On the other hand, his example mail
> (To: duplic...@packages.debian.org) is obviously sent to developers, so
> I'd guess no harm is done for ou
Ben Finney wrote on 2011-10-08 07:34:
> Why did it take so long? Aptitude shows immediately that ‘duply’ was to
> be removed because ‘duplicity’ was to be removed; and looking one step
Usually I use Debian Stable as productive system. So aptitude would be
not a help. I looked on packages.qa.debia
Tollef Fog Heen wrote on 2011-10-19 15:49:
> Yes, that's somewhat ugly. You already have to handle % encoded links
> for anything pointing to packages with version numbers including ~
> though, so this won't make any difference there.
And it would be more difficult for reading - at least for me
Jeremy Bicha wrote on 2012-12-03 15:39:
> What's so bad about evince that you need to use a forked version
> anyway? Or gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, gnome-terminal, etc.
And in the same way: why mdm instead of gdm ?
I have created some updates of gdm with the same patches as mdm, but
without
Hello,
since kernel 2.6.25 SMACK is inside the official kernel as alternative to
the large SELinux framework. But until now there are no userspace tools
packaged in Debian to administrate SMACK. And also there are no additional
patches made for system tools (coreutils, ssh, busybox ...).
How is t
Russell Coker wrote on 2011-03-30 22:45:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > How is the opinion about support for this alternative security framework?
>
> I think it would be good to have it.
O.k.
> > Does some Debian developer want to add userspac
Hello Russell and Christian,
Russell Coker wrote on 2011-04-01 10:19:
>
> If you need some tips then I will be happy to offer some. I can also host
> some developer resources if you need it (we can discuss that off-list).
Thank you for your offer for tips and resources.
> But you really have
Ben Hutchings wrote on 2011-04-16 16:11:
> I'm (slowly) working on a way to build in all LSMs and then free memory
> for those that aren't used.
That is a good news because I am on the way to package smack tools for
Debian.
---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Drake Wilson wrote on 2011-05-15 18:57:
> FWIW, I'm using Debian on a Soekris box with an AMD Geode. ISTR being
> | model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi
For clarification. There were some different Geode CPUs on the market:
CPUs of the old company National Semico
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I request an adopter for the fox1.6 package, as I don't have enough
time anymore.
The package description is:
FOX is a C++ based Toolkit for developing Graphical User Interfaces
easily and effectively. It offers a wide c
34 matches
Mail list logo
