download and install
> variousredistributable runtime libraries
Do we really need a package for a single file?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
7th-june-2007
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
"build".
You can work around it, as has been pointed out in this thread, by
moving arch:all stuff outside of the build target to something which the
binary-indep target has a pre-requisite on, but then you're building as
root.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
what it was -- maybe it doesn't exist anymore.
This used to be available as source.debian.net. According to the
wiki[0], there appears to be work starting on a replacement.
[0]: http://wiki.debian.org/source.debian.org
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
kms. The other is building stuff with
> module-assistant, usually in -source packages as in
> openafs-modules-source.
>
> The suffix makes it clear what kind of package this is.
Sure, but that's a distinction for the names of the binary packages not
that of the source package.
--
uld be prime for triggers instead of having the various
database-providing package worry about what the server needs to do.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin_jitezhmv0ufotxfde77hc6ocarisbfw5z...@mail.gmail.com
user input here, correct?
>>
>> Yes, but you shouldn't, since the file installed in lenny was not modified,
>> so it's a bug somewhere.
>
> Well I'm fairly new to the maintainance of this package but I would guess the
> postinst of lenny modifies ip
if yes, what exactly would you propose?
dict-wn is what started dictd. The problem is that dict-wn's postinst
in Lenny didn't use invoke-rc.d to restart dictd, so it didn't honor
policy-rc.d. This isn't a problem in Squeeze since the postinst is
using invoke-rc.d.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7;t be able to
recover. The proper fix is to configure the unattended upgrade not to
upgrade kernels, if possible.
[0]: See /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/000kernel-change
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> James Vega writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>> My claim is that packages like unattended-upgrades and pm-utils are
>>> completely unrelated to each other, and that a hook in
>>&
erl
> Description : yet another json package
Isn't this what the libjson-perl package already in the archive is?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
rt. This is currently Perl and shell.
So yes, IMO, accepting scripts written in Python (or any other language)
is too heavy. Not for a "_development_ machine", but for a maintenance
team. If people choose to ignore our requirement and develop scripts in
other languages, then they can
contribute. One generally tries to work with a project, not write a lot
of code in a language the project isn't using and then come back later
to try and push that code into the project.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
keep them in ubuntu-dev-tools?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinJC2AHouG=prenzbpod0ls4dxzmygvbmrwo...@mail.gmail.com
n order to compute the hash sum
for comparison?
[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/2011/02/msg00055.html
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
f you "apt-get update" while the mirror is in the
middle of a sync. Once the mirror has finished the sync, you'll be able
to use it normally, but the real fix would be for the mirror to update
their script.
[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/2011/02/msg00055.html
--
Jame
hose files/directories a
command gets run. They're supposed to make it so that only one package (the
one providing the command that needs to be run) has to know that the command
needs to be run. This is far less error-prone than relying on every developer
to remember which commands to run in
words as
> possible, is the impediment?
Read the CDDL section under the FSF's list of GPL incompatible licenses.
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
elog:
+ Removed
- description-synopsis-has-leading-spaces
- postinst-does-not-call-installdocs
- prerm-does-not-call-installdocs
So, you're just using outdated tools.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
vironment")
endif
ifeq "$(origin FOO)" "file"
$(info "FOO was set in the Makefile")
endif
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
deed look better.
>
> Please have a look at garlic-doc. It does not look right.
It's using `o' as the bullet character which is not supported by
Markdown/rST. This has already been identified as a case that will need
to be fixed by the individual packages (or pre-processed into some other
character).
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
type of person who treats email as an extension of your
long-term memory, Sup is for you.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> I find no official documentation on format of debian/watch files.
man uscan
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >> I find no official documentation on format of debian/watch files.
> >
> > man uscan
>
>
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> >> James Vega wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >
together on the package?
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/526348
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s probably one of the reasons why the per-file Copyright field is
listed as option in the DEP.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) which
simplifies making watch files for github projects.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; without epoch. But this is not documented anywhere.
Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use
0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of
needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/6
that look like
> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/$scm/$project for $scm in arch bzr darcs git
> >> hg;
>
> Please provide a proper gitweb instance or at least a proxy at that url
> to the anonscm gitweb instanace.
The old URLs now redirect to the new ones, so nothing should be broke
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 25/05/2011 13:20, James Vega wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas
's not
> really that hard).
Feel free to post a (link to a) patch on above URL or in #alioth@OFTC.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
each of which is in a different package.
>
> Probably the best thing to do would be to just incorporate the functionality
> in the less package.
You mean like lesspipe(1)? Seems like it might need to be updated to
handle *.xz, but other than that looks like it fits the bill.
--
Ja
mming Lang: Python
> Description : drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7
There was already an ITP for this (#637849) and it was cancelled due to
the planned removal of Python 2.6.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
