Re: XEmacs maintainer gone???!!

1997-06-20 Thread James LewisMoss
mean that the maintainer for XEMacs is gone? No it just means my old ISP decided to remove my account without telling me. Nice of them eh? :) My new address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Lin

Re: Emacsen proposal (assuming silence == acceptance)

1998-01-10 Thread James LewisMoss
ut after emacsen-common is out will just require that package and that should be all that is needed. Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is cool! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours.&

Re: Why isn't /bin/sh managed with alternatives?

1998-04-08 Thread James LewisMoss
pen("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3 Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!

Re: Licensing, was elvis package

1998-04-26 Thread James LewisMoss
rograms being Qtized are owned by the FSF and the authors haven't been informed for the programs (or they don't have a problem with it). Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your

ITP: Re: Must hand off XEmacs21 project!

1999-10-02 Thread James LewisMoss
could have offered it back knowing I had already made packages rather than posting a general mail to -devel. So, to all on devel consider this a ITP on xemacs21 and I would appreciate anyone who has a chance to test the packages. Apt line that should work: "deb http://va.debian.org/~dres

Re: switching to libxml2

2001-04-24 Thread James LewisMoss
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Davide> There're real troubles: for example look at sodipodi; it uses Davide> libglade-gnome0, so I need libxml-dev (libglade-gnome0-dev Davide> depends on it),

Two sets of binary packages from one source package?

2001-09-03 Thread James LewisMoss
vs gnome bin packages) coming from the same source package? Thanks Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

Intent to package: bnlib

1999-01-21 Thread James LewisMoss
m Author(s): Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright: GPL. Please see /usr/doc/copyright/GPL for full text. Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

Re: Debian logo & its license

1999-01-24 Thread James LewisMoss
What we do about the logo (with options a) keep current, b) keep current for some amount of time, c) get new one in some manner). Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

XEmacs 21

1999-09-18 Thread James LewisMoss
apel xemacs21" after xemacs is installed. 3) The info pages are a bit messed. (Working on it.) 4) Yes I plan on splitting out the -mulesupport and -basesupport into separate "packages" (in the xemacs sense), but haven't gotten to it yet. I think that's about

Re: Increasing regularity of build systems

1999-09-19 Thread James LewisMoss
done (the configure.in file was modified. Know any other way to recreate the configure file?). As it is this is no longer neccessary and will go away (patch upstream fixes the problem I was having). At least I did remove the configure file so that the patch wasn't ungodly large. Dres