>>>>> On 09 Jan 1998 20:25:17 -0500, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Rob> I'm assuming that since no one commented on this proposal, that Rob> no one objects. So I'm going to move forward with this. I can Rob> always back off later if there's a big problem, but I just Rob> wanted to make sure that there weren't any obvious problems (or Rob> a way around the Provides: emacsen instead of Provides: emacs Rob> issue) before I wasted too much time. This issue is holding up Rob> the emacs20 package, though, so I want to move on now. Rob> I think Mark is willing to put the startup change into emacs 19, Rob> and if James is willing too, then we're set. Until that's done Rob> I can just make emacsen-common conflict with xemacs, which I Rob> believe is no worse than the current situation. I have no problem with it, but please don't make it conflict. It won't add anything and will just cause problems (as far as I understand the proposal there are no overlapping files, so a conflict won't do anything but add an artificial conflict). The next version of xemacs I put out after emacsen-common is out will just require that package and that should be all that is needed. Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is cool! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
