On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:36 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:26:00PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:30 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > On 08-Dec-04, 11:15 (CST), "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > Get off your ass.
>
The most high and most honorable Ian Murdock wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi Back at you.
> Let me first say unequivocally that the LCC is very interested in
> getting Debian involved. The question has always been: How do we do
> that? It's one thing for a bunch of companies that can push down
> decisio
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 21:35 -0800, Philip Miller wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Many reasons people come to Debian... Distributed Binaries is not one of
> > them.
>
> If you think this isn't a reason to use Debian, I, as a long-time user, will
> tell you that
>
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 12:50 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:40:29PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
> > Let me first say unequivocally that the LCC is very interested in
> > getting Debian involved. The question has always been: How do we do
> > that?
>
> I think there is one o
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 06:31 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 23:15 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > John Goerzen dijo [Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:40:51PM -0600]:
> > > > I think that tying core Debian packages to the Red Hat boat anchor is a
> > > > horrible, horrible idea.
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 16:17 +0100, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Martin Schulze schreef:
> > Paul van der Vlis wrote:
[...]
> > At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
> > a sentence would not mean anything.
> >
> >>I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready"
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 14:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, you could argue that debian branches are not perfectly named but:
> > "stable" is best if you need *absolute* failsafety for critical jobs
> > "testing" is best if you want a stable s
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 04, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It shouldn't be forgotten that the biggest blocker after these things is
> > probably a general failure to actually care all that much. How many
> > people are actually behaving as
I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
http://www.gregfolkert.net/experimental/
not an archive by any means, but available at your dis
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 08:55 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I have built this package for alpha and it does indeed work. I have
> bundled it up in a tgz making it easier to D/L. But all the files are
> there as well for individual inspection. Along with the md5sums
>
> http://www.
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 23:18 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Greg doesn't appear to be a Debian developer so neither of this
> applies. The first paragraph is good advice in general, though.
Apologies for not expounding on this point. Any further deeds done this
way, will be disclaimed that I am
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 17:30 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:28:55PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > Btw: Leaving old packages build from -source packages around would quite
> > well
> > do the trick. But I suppose W.B. wants to call more people assholes before
> > invo
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 18:46 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:32:50AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > No, you should use module-assistant tool, which is a high level tool
>
> If I have installed module-assistant and ndiswrapper-source and have
> not installed nd
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:54 +0100, Blade wrote:
> That's the normal way. This way allows me to install dozens of
> module-source packages and build module packages from them for Debian
> kernels, without having to install a half GiB of additional software
> that I really do not need.
>
> What we r
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:09 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:55:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > (c) Download and install it for you.
>
> You're right, but there's still one problem:
> It breaks first and *then* fixes it.
> By the tim
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:25 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:13:02PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Fine then, don't use it. It'll pull the deps before it install the
> > modules and unloads them and re-loads them.
>
> I just didn
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 11:46 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> I have uploaded a new version of the 'mplayer' package for Debian,
> namely version 1.0pre6-1
>
> (Unfortunately it does not show yet in the new queue at
> http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html
> but it is also accessible at
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 06:52 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 11:46 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > I have uploaded a new version of the 'mplayer' package for Debian,
> > namely version 1.0pre6-1
> >
> > (Unfortunately it
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi debianista,
>
> after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
> concept. any comment appreciated.
>
> http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.p
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 16:36 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
[...let's all get along outside Debian please snippage...]
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Cc: [EMAIL P
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:24 -0800, Blunt Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:31:20 +, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Scripsit Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > As a general note, I find it annoying, frustrating, and confusing
> > > whenever ANY debian package has
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 06:54 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:01:45 +1100, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If something like this is different, then not only should Debian
> >supplied documentation reflect the change, but a list of differences
> >should appear in README.Debi
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 20:08 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:16:24 -0500, Greg Folkert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Except I'd rather see --keepcomments as
> >default and changed to --removecomments. My only gripe, pretty minimal.
>
> And
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:35 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem
> sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).
>
> This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just
> use the standard kerne
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 00:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Aurélien,
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> > Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > >The much larger consequence of this meeting, however, has been the
> > >crafting of a prospective release plan for etch. The r
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 22:45 -0500, SR, ESC wrote:
> good bye.
Nice of you to stop in for tea.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 16:02 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Romain Francoise wrote:
> > And Debian wouldn't be fun without a few enmities, we wouldn't have great
> > posts like http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg01308.html or
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2001/12/msg0
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 16:00 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:34:07AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > I guess this can go... or be changed to not be so specific.
>
> No, it can't go. Note that it has been changed to talk about etch, not
> sarge. Th
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:12 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/24/06 11:54, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:25:27AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 11/24/06 06:06, Jon Dowland wrote:
> >>> I think that having the shell re-imple
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 22:05 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:41:11PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > - goobox: gnome.org module that did not see any new upstream release
> > >since november 2005 and seems to be completely superseded
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 08:56 +0300, Kirill A. Korinskiy wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: sxemacs
> Version : 22.1.6
> Upstream Author :
> * URL or Web page : http://sxemacs.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description :
>
So, the old addage:
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 13:38 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> André Appel wrote:
> > nseepd is a shell script which prints the kb/s which are currently
> > beeing received and transmitted by a NIC in a direct way only using
> > simple shell commands. No superuser rights required. All other tools I
> > foun
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 19:59 +0100, de Bladen wrote:
> In the meantime, begin to recompile Debian with staticaly linked
> packages. That is very important, you know. That evil libc causes such a
> mess of tight coupling, one could become crazy from just imaging all the
> possible consequences!!!
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 09:28 +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
> think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
> for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
>
> The packag
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:12, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This thread has been going on for a while, and I think the general
> >> voice has been that security backports and other vital patches are
> >> totally alr
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 23:10, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So which of the 11 platforms _REQUIRE_ the IPSEC backport? If any, what
> > is the rational that they *REQUIRE* that piece.
>
> As for the criteria for inclus
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 12:08, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian
> >Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images..
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:18, Joey Hess wrote:
> The alpha port still has boot issues. In particular, we still lack the
> source to milo. This is unresolved. Despite this, CD images are in
> progress.
Which version of milo are you referring to?
I still have 0.13 through 0.27 laying around. Will th
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 13:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:49:29PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 12:18, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > The alpha port still has boot issues. In particular, we still lack the
> > > source to milo. This
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:57 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 7/14/05, Christian Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anand Kumria wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for your comments -- however I don't think anyone should be able
> > > afraid to point out when a debian developer is obvio
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 00:42 -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
> I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full
> on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING.
>
> X team you rock. This is why I started using Debian 7 years ago. This is
> what keeps me here.
>
> One and only one
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 21:25 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:03:00PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:57 +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > On 7/14/05, Christian Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
I was finally able to acquire an SSP Build Host for you.
If you are still interest. Please contact me.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For technology that is
Strong, Better, Faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 20:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:55:53PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:22:51PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:03:15 +0100
> > > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Just FYI, I *per
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 02:50 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:27:23PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behaviour,
> > >> should we?
> > >
> > > Contrary to us, GNOME (in
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> > users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 14:13 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 06:34 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Are you telling me that these features I keep see getting removed are
> > *NOT* about usability for me? OK, functionality to me... Functionality
> > for me determ
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:16 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > > &g
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 18:06 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:16 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > > On
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:12 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 21:32 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > I have regularly had my GCONF stuff partially corrupted in any case.
> > Associations go away, programs crash spontaneously, I look for bugs...
> >
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:30 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 22 janvier 2007 à 09:59 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > Yeap, you are right. I am dumb.
>
> I was not sure of it, but this mail just convinced me you are.
>
> > But let me ask you this, are you t
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 19:32 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Oh, right. Now, you're blaming GNOME for the way Christian Marillat used
> to deal with bugs. Fine.
I bow GNOME Overlord.
> People who use the software and report bugs when they find some are more
> likely to get support than those bash
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 19:10 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:15:44PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > [2] Unfortunately there was very little notice of goedel's move and it
> > > was originally scheduled only to take a couple of days but was
> > > unavoidably delayed b
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> For programming languages, I prefer the one that makes programmers
> easily understand all code written by others. For desktop environments,
> I prefer the one that provides the cleanest and most efficient UI. YMMV.
Wow, my extreme GNOME
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 12:48:47PM -0500, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:15 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > For programming languages, I prefer the one that mak
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:44 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:30:40AM -0800, a sh wrote:
> > hi
> > I want debian etch sorce code and desktop picture.
> > I have advertisment purppose.
> > if it's possible for you please sent to my mail.
> > thank
>
> Your mailbox
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 01:30 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Hi!
> There's the following problem with the fluxbox package.
>
> The locale in the etch distributive ia already set into UTF-8 as
> default. Fluxbox has been maintaining UTF-8 for a long time.
>
> From July in experimental/ there
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:15 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > I am sure yoush hasn't done a thing with it, as Experimental packages
> > don't need to be maintained, period.
>
> Bullshit.
Seems I am not the only one that believes GNOME is limiting.
Linus Torvalds has submitted patches. I am betting they get ignored or
rejected with "to complex for our idiot users".
Yes, Joss could you please explain this away for me?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell's Directory Services is a competit
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:20 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> That said, he should have just used reportbug and let the maintainers
> work it out :)
s/work\ it\ out/reject\ it\/won\'t\ fix\ it/
Sorry, but when I see things like this:
http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/desktop_archi
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 20:27 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> If you could also shut the fuck up, that would be even better.
I see you have a great command of the language. Really... I'd expect
nothing better. You should realize that you are just making a better and
better case for how much the
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 17:37 +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > wiki.debian.org has been moved to a new host with lots of available
> > disk space, so updates should be fine now. For the first 90 minutes
> > after the move exim wasn't running, so updates during
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:46 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 mars 2007 à 14:33 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > > I'm not the one who said maintainers don't admit they need help.
> >
> > And I am not the one who said that Mozilla/KDE/GNOME have enough
> > manpower.
>
> Who said that
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 10:33 +, Howard Young wrote:
> I know of a way that maintainers could be increased substantially (I
> expect hundreds to many thousands a year).
> I am not sure of the specifics but I have little doubt that in the end
> it would work.
> It will likely take more than four
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 11:03 -0400, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> I'm looking to buy or build an install host -- one machine dedicated to
> building and serving a local repository for the purposes of
> installing/upgrading/maintaining other Debian hosts throughout our
> organization. T
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 21:21 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Heya,
> > And for clarity, IA32 cover 32-bit Intel and works for AMD 32-bit
> > processors.
> >
>
> but ia32 will just work fine on amd64 architectures.
> You can decide if you want to run a 32 or 64bit Linux on amd64/emt64.
> Both ways
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 00:45 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:17:23AM -0400, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> >
> > My distro is Debian Etch.
> > kernel is 2.6.18
> > I have post it to pthread mailing list,They said me that i reinstall
> > libc6-dev package,i reinstalled it,But i
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:16 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> >> 1) fix software that interprets incoming mails
> >
> >There is nothing wrong with the software that interprets
> > incoming mails; the mails that fail actually fail cryptographic
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 22:55 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:13:07PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> > I don't think it needs win64-only games.
>
> Please remember that this is debian-devel and not some general
> discussion list.
HA, that is going in the "context is everyt
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 17:57 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Emanuele Rocca píše v Čt 15. 03. 2007 v 10:33 +0100:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > quoting http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSystem#systemadministration
> >
> > "Debian has been qualified as a OMG operating system for administrators,
> > primarily becaus
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 22:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> the maintainer of tilda (Zak Elep) seems disappeared :) I wrote him a
> lot of e-mails and he never answered me.
>
> I like this useful program, I use it every day, that's why I've built
> tilda[1] with the new upstream version an
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 02:25 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greg Folkert ha scritto:
>
> > Not to be a stick in the mud... but I show this:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show tilda
> > Package: tilda
> > Priority: opt
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 15:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like to start a new sub-project called Debian4Business or perhaps
> Debian-Office.I have a slight preference for the first name, but this is
> discussable of course.
Since your are using Debian as a base, have at it. Do you best
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:01 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Perhaps we should really propose a "Day of No Spam-Filtering" on
> lists.d.o. ;-)
Umm, is there enough BANDWIDTH ON THE ENTARWEB to support that?
/me thinks not
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, fas
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 02:25 +0930, Stef Daniels wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am a happy user of the Debian GNU\Linux
> Distribution. I would like to pose a question to the developers, who
> may be able to provide the following option:
>
> Could an option for the installation of a defaul
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 15:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:16:29PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio a écrit :
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Jérémy Bobbio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Torbutton is a 1-click way for Iceweasel/Icedove users to enable or disable
I have to apologize publicly on my choice of language.
I have been contacted by a few people (some from Debian, others being
list subscribers) asking to me to consider the wide ranging areas and
breadth of people subscribed to this list. Considering this on when
using language that cause one's "mi
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 20:28 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
> Version : 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
> Upstream Author : MPAA <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 21:25 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau escribió:
> > I installed linux-image-2.6.21-1-686 from
> > http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net and I would like to also install
> > linux-headers-2.6.21-1-686 (to build some modules for the Apple MacBook
> > Pro not
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 17:07 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> Didn't your AM tell you? All Debian developers are required to be
> impervious to humour, irony, puns, simile, or for that matter rational
> thinking.
Where do I sign up for this? As I already have traits, I should be a
shoe-in and shoul
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:55 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Ask somebody, what distro would he install at desktop for novice or
> M$ refugee?
For me the choice is clear. I use Debian for myself. I choose to support
Ubuntu for people that do not want as many choices. This is what M$
refugees t
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
>
> > We're going OT, however my experience based on last two Debian
> releases:
> > testing becomes quite "stable in means of usability" somewhere half
> year
> > before it's released as "s
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:44 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said:
> > Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit:
> > >
> > > I have always just asked them on IRC on #debian-kernel.
> >
> > Have you done this time again?
> > If not, could you? (I do
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:56 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Michelle Konzack said:
> > You forger that DOWNGRADING is officialy NOT SUPPORTED by Debian.
>
> That should be changed anyway, since security upgrades occasionally
> break things too.
You keep saying this, I haven't seen this in Sa
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 08:17 +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> >Lennart said
> >> Peter said
> >> If You and several people claim they haven't met such problems with
> >> testing, I can live with that. I also heard people whose experience was
> >> different, and my personal one is closer to them
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 21:34 +0200, Amir Tabatabaei wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 12:29 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> > You should try using aptitude, it does what you want ;-)
>
> Just a friendly question: Why is this feature not added to apt-get, too?
> It is so useful and there are
a bunch in the beginning, of late the number of OT posters
> is also increasing. Now that the complaint is coming from a DD, I hope that
> some action/policy will be laid out...
>
> Greg Folkert (http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/05/msg01282.html)
> even made a mockery of peop
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 06:42:48PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > I guess you'd rather see the OT posters go away. There are about 30 of
> > us. Though, I "got the hint" with Neil Sumner reporting me to th
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:14 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 01:44 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Ludovic Rousseau said:
> > > Le 10.05.2007, à 00:25:32, Stephen Gran a écrit:
> > > >
> > > > I have alway
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 21:06 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:19:28PM -0400, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > It was really hard for me to switch to using aptitude, but now since I
> > have, I get annoyed when I use apt-get
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 00:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:43:31 -0400, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> For example, in the case you're talking about, you'd have to explain
> >> that ucf would like to be able to use debconf-loadtempla
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:04:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Andrei Popescu a écrit :
> > >
> > > IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out
> >
> > By the way, isn't debian-deve
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans, Cord, Martin, Pascal,
>
> I'm writing the listmasters because reading debian-user has become
> nearly unbearable for me (one of the sadly few DDs who bothers to read
> our user lists) due to volume and offensiveness/repetativeness of
> o
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 15:39, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.22.1207 +0200]:
> > Let's create a package called "linux-2.4.22" or
> > "linux-2.4.22-pure-vanilla-source-for-you-to-patch" with a script which
> > does exactly this.
>
> I oppose. Let's get
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:51, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:48:32AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Would it NO doubt make entirely MUCH more sense, to only have to D/L the
> > Source Code once.
>
> Would it be POSSIBLE to LOSE the Zippy-style CAPITALIZATION,
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 04:38, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> To name but a few. Just because there's little incentive to use static
> linkage when building Debian packages doesn't mean that we should
> deprecate it. Unless you're willing to convince the admin of the
> beowulf cluster next door to install li
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:14, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>
> > Before that realization, it seemed like the type of random cruft that
> > sometimes gets pulled in on dist-upgrade; a name change would help
> > alleviate that initial perc
I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
Only no User licenses)
I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good connectivity, but is
shared with the business it would be located at.
I guess, the qu
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I have a DEC Alpha 2100 Dual Processor with 256MB Memory and ~60GB of
> drives space. It currently doesn't have any OS on it (well Tru64 Runtime
> Only no User licenses)
>
> I have a 1.5MBps SDSL line with a pretty good
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:17, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > Otto Wyss dijo:
> > > dpkg-reconfigure alsa-modules-2.4.22-1-k6
> > >
> > > but this doesn't show the driver list again! Okay getting dselect out,
> > > purge the package and install it again. But now the list isn't shown
> > > either. How do I g
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
