h I am still hoping hg or bzr will overtake git in DVCS
package management)
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
then any dangaling files from other packages
should stay under ucf responsibility.
If ucf is purged ucf package should nuke all / any dangaling files
which were touched by other packages.
Maybe i don't understand something....
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледк
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name: python-portio
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Fabrizio Pollastri
* URL : http://portio.inrim.it/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python, C
Description : low level port I/O
ed to
package it for myself and anyone else.
Should my packaging be changed to i386 & amd64 only?
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
form.
There isn't DEB-5 debian/copyright parser available. So this cannot be
implemented in licensecheck yet.
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary at
t* should be done, and *how* it should be
done (agreement needs to be expressed by all affected parties, not
just the drivers; silence is not agreement, but unanimity is not
required, either)
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
() ascii ribbon c
rs did.
As for that neural network stuff do it in post-install scripts =) make
the users happy as for why dpkg is using all cpu cores forever on that
package. *just kidding*
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
() ascii ribbon campaign - against
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
usb-creator-hack...@lists.launchpad.net,
ubuntu-instal...@lists.ubuntu.com
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name : usb-creator
Version : 0.2.23
Upstream Author : Evan Dandrea
* URL
2009/2/15 Gunnar Wolf
>
> Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:42:37PM +0100]:
> > | when i've had to do this in the past i think i did something like
> > | ~.git.. this way you get lots of relevant info, the
> > | fact that it's a prerelease of , the date the snapshot was taken,
> > | t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name: vitables
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Vicent Mas
* URL : http://vitables.berlios.de/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : graphical tool to browse and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: glosung
Version : 3.4.1
Upstream Author : Eicke Godehardt
* URL : http://www.godehardt.org/losung.html
* License : GPL-2+
Programming
Dear all,
I noticed that offlineimap was a few upstream releases behind.
I filed a bug report on the 19th of April, offering to update the
package, go through bug reports, and maintain the package.
There was no response from the current maintainer, John Francesco Ferlito.
His packages have litt
On 25/04/12 18:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I noticed that offlineimap was a few upstream releases behind.
>
> I filed a bug report on the 19th of April, offering to update the
Just to clarify, I filed MIA query, not because I am impatient since
19th of April 20
On 27/05/12 14:53, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 03:29 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Which means a *huge* performance
>> improvement. Do the measurements yourself, it works with basically
>> anything that makes heavy use of /tmp.
>>
> I have yet to know what application you are talking
On 30/05/12 17:17, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2012-05-30 13:20:24 +0100 (+0100), Philip Ashmore wrote:
> [...]
>> By the way, this extends to man/info pages too, but as they're
>> versioned, you can refer to a specific version through the package
>> version.
> [...]
>
> I've always liked the way OpenBS
On 30/05/12 17:45, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2012-05-30 17:35:14 +0100 (+0100), Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> Isn't it possible to extract those from snapshot.debian.org
>> per-release/per-time ?
>
> Sure, or archive.d.o, but at my day job a lot of the admins I work
> wit
f over the weekend. Feel free
>> to upload an NMU in the meantime though and I'd be more than happy to
>> have another maintainer.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:37:38PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>&g
Dear all,
I have uploaded libavg_1.7.1-1 into delayed/7 queue. After that it will
hit new, as it was previously removed.
Previously this package was removed due to being RC buggy and not used.
The maintainance of this package has been picked in Ubuntu. I am now
reintroducing this package back int
On 14/06/12 22:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs (14/06/2012):
>> I have uploaded libavg_1.7.1-1 into delayed/7 queue. After that it
>> will hit new, as it was previously removed.
>
> Why the seven days delay? It looks to me like you could/should skip
> tha
On 18/06/12 21:11, Jamie White wrote:
> Hiya
>
> Just a quick question, which malloc, is there anyway that this function
> (used in C) could allocate memory into already allocated memory, such as
> the stack - or code space!
>
> Jamie
>
>
Cross posting offtopic email to two mailing lists (ubun
On 18/06/12 21:25, Jamie White wrote:
> Hiya
>
> Just a quick question, which malloc, is there anyway that this function
> (used in C) could allocate memory into already allocated memory, such as
> the stack - or code space!
>
> Jamie
>
>
sorry, not to two mailing lists. to the same one twice i
On 22/06/12 19:23, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Yaroslav Halchenko writes:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
archive-wide rebuilds of arch:all packages as we routinely do rebuilds
of arch:any packages.
(Cc:-ing Lucas, for his great work on QA rebuilds.)
>>> Are
Dear all,
sinfo package is not RC, but it hasn't been updated in a while.
Jürgen Rinas or Gaudenz Steinlin do you intend to continue maintaining it?
--
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
On 23/06/12 07:47, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi Dimitrijs
>>
>> sinfo package is not RC, but it hasn't been updated in a while.
>>
>> Jürgen Rinas or Gaudenz Steinlin do you intend to continue maintaining it?
>
> Thanks for the heads up. Jürgen do you still intend to maintain sinfo in
> Debian?
On 27/06/12 14:20, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:09 +0300, Serge wrote:
>> 2012/6/25 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
BTW, it's interesting that Fedora/CentOS use -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
and they use it in CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS.
>>>
>>> Presumably as a workaround for build systems that
On 29/06/12 18:21, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
>
> * Package name: ben
> Version : 0.6
> Upstream Author : Mehdi Dogguy and Stéphane Glondu
> * URL : http://ben.debian.net/
> * License : AGPL-3+
> Programming
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: clusterit
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Tim Rightnour
* URL or Web page : http://sourceforge.net/projects/clusterit/
* License : BSD-4-clause
Description : utilities for distributed computing
On 6 August 2012 14:37, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The following package pairs:
> 1) are co-installable,
> 2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
> within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
>
> sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
> crm: crm114 pacemaker
> cutter: cu
On 15 August 2012 23:45, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
> The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
> maintainer;
> but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
>
> How may I proceed to adopt it ?
>
I real
On 29/08/12 15:01, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:56:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> Before wondering whether PNG files should have an additional
>> compression level, is there any reason why a better PNG compression
>> isn't used in the first place? For instance, "optipng -o
Dear all,
cia.navi.cx is deprecated, but now has stopped working.
You should use cia.vc instead.
Looking on vasks there are many team tooks that submit to cia.navi.cx
(mail mail or RPC), please update those to use cia.vc. hostname
instead.
Alioth SVN:
axel/hooks/svnmailer.conf:cia_rpc_server =
On 10 September 2012 13:46, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:01:17PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> When building for as many architectures as we have, situation when some
>> dependencies are missing (or can't exist) on some architectures is not rare.
>>
>> However we still want to
On 8 September 2012 09:30, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 05:08:34PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>>Package name: optional-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> There are situations when some of the libraries listed in Build-Depends
>> are optional i.e. build system is smar
On 13 September 2012 00:55, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
>
> Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)P. Saint-
On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> - Neither systemd nor upstart are likely to be ported to kfreebsd soon,
> as they both rely on many Linux-specific features and interfaces.
>
Well, Colin Watson, Matthias K
On 13 May 2013 19:14, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Philip Hands writes:
>
>> No matter what the technical merits, the inevitable flame war regarding
>> copyright assignment seems very likely to render upstart a non-starter
>> as an essential element of Debian.
>
> Debian already uses many packages as pa
On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
>> On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 20/05/13 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>&
On 22 May 2013 03:09, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 01:47:42 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 22 May 2013 01:16, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > Am 22.05.2013 02:00, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
>> >> On 21 May 2013 21:53, Lucas Nussbaum
On 22 May 2013 03:32, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:16:29AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I have signed Canonical's and Python Software Foundation's contributor
>> agreements.
>> But I have no intention to assign copyright to FSF at the
On 23 May 2013 10:37, Ole Laursen wrote:
> Steve Langasek debian.org> writes:
>> Sorry you ran into trouble with upstart.
>
> Not a DD, just a happy Debian user, hope you'll excuse me, but on the topic
> of Upstart, I have some technical comments on why, surprisingly, I think it
> may not be matu
On 24 May 2013 23:16, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2013/5/23 Helmut Grohne :
>> * stdout/stderr to syslog redirection
>>This is possibly implementable, but needs more than a line of shell.
>
> In Solaris SMF each service has its own log file with SMF messages
> *and* all stdout/stderr
>
> pashev@bok:~
On 5 June 2013 23:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Svante Signell writes:
>
>> Not everybody agrees to that, there is a split opinion about this.
>> Please lift this discussion a little higher: Which would be the default
>> desktop for jessie?
>
> Because we weren't having enough fun with systemd vs. up
On 5 June 2013 23:42, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Russ Allbery , 2013-06-05, 15:02:
>
>> udev sucks! Debian should hire a developer to replace all uses of CDBS
>> with dh! Perl should be replaced with Python in essential! All packages
>> need to switch to 3.0 (quilt)! Native packages should be banne
#s-upstart
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UpstartCompatibleInitScripts
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712763
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Original Message
Subject: upstart: implementing Debian Policy §9.11.1
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:58:38 +0100
From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
To
#s-upstart
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UpstartCompatibleInitScripts
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712763
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Original Message
Subject: upstart: implementing Debian Policy §9.11.1
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:58:38 +0100
From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
To
On 20 June 2013 16:32, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
>> if init_is_upstart; then
>> upstart_job=/etc/init/$(basename ${0:-}).conf
>> if [ -f ${upstart_job:-} ] && [ ! -L ${upstart_job:-} ]; then
>
> Why the -L ?
>
! -L = not a
On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>
>> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
>> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
>> which is sourced by /lib/lsb/init-functions from init-
On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>> >
>> >> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I
On 21 June 2013 15:05, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> On 20 June 2
On 25 June 2013 19:21, Alexandre Rebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
> wrote:
>> From Ubuntu point of view, we'd also be interested in a similar
>> analysis. Unlike Debian we provide automatically generated packages
>>
Dear all,
On 30 June 2013 23:21, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>
>
> vtk source: lintian output: 'missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)',
> automatically rejected package.
> vtk source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag.
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to
On 2 July 2013 17:58, Nick Andrik wrote:
> 2013/7/2 Russ Allbery :
>> I don't believe the AGPL was ever intended to be used for libraries.
>> Quite a bit of the license is very difficult to interpret as applied to a
>> library. (For example, does that mean that every application using the
>> libr
On 7 Jul 2013 12:05, "Stéphane Glondu" wrote:
>
> Le 07/07/2013 08:39, Scott Leggett a écrit :
> >> you may not (and you may not permit anyone else to) copy, modify,
> >> create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, decompile or
> >> otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the Software o
On 9 July 2013 10:18, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> So it is no need to create any input XML descriptors and compile header
>> files of a library anymore.
>>
>> However, this approach has some drawbacks. Perhaps the main drawback is the
>> inabil
On 10 July 2013 09:20, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> There is a simple Perl script to do that:
>
> Thanks, what about including this capability in a-c-c itself?
>
I'd take a patch to dh-acc ;-)
>> my $Version = `dpkg -s $Package|grep Version`;
On 16 July 2013 17:07, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:37:09PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think that we agreed on merging /usr at all. I have written
>> > some patches for initramfs-tools to permit fsck and mount
On 16 July 2013 19:39, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:38:18PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 16 July 2013 17:07, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > Once the rootfs is mounted, we parse $root/etc/fstab and mount /usr
>> > using that information. When ini
On 17 July 2013 17:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 05:38 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would not have posted if that had been the first time I found Joss'
>> advocacy offensive. It is, however, a repeated pattern.
>
>
> From which I would infer you shouldn't take it as a pe
On 18 July 2013 21:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thomas Goirand (2013-07-19):
>> So that brings me to ask: do you have an idea of how much work it would
>> be to have Upstart ported to kFreeBSD or Hurd (even if that would mean
>> loosing some of the functionality (obviously cgroups comes to mind))?
On 22 July 2013 10:17, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 22 juillet 2013 à 10:45 +0200, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
>> systemd being installed does not mean it will be used as init. The
>> package happens to contain a few tools the GNOME Shell needs, that is
>> all, to the best of my knowledge. It's a
On 1 August 2013 15:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> [...] in preparation to add non-gzip compression support for control.tar
>
> May I ask why would you want that?
>
> There's a lot of extra complexity, incompatibility with existing tool
On 1 August 2013 16:21, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:52:38PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 1 August 2013 15:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> >> [...] in preparation to add no
On 6 August 2013 14:41, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the maintainer of Wt [1], a C++ web development library (think of Qt or
> Gtk+ for the web) and web server.
>
> My upstream [2] sent me a mail asking about mixing C++03 and C++11. My
> understanding is it is not possible for a va
On 12 August 2013 01:51, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:49:57PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I propose the following sub-goals:
>
> 1. all programs should, in their default configuration, accept UTF-8 input
>and pass it through uncorrupted. Having to manually specify en
On 17 June 2013 23:58, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> tags 680686 patch
> thanks
>
> On 14 June 2013 12:35, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>> - Fix debhelper not passing --disable-silent-rules by default.
>>#680686
>>I think cdbs already does this.
>
> P
On 13 August 2013 14:36, Joey Hess wrote:
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> Is there any reason this hasn't been applied yet?
>> Can I NMU this, as debhelper is marked as LowNMU package.
>
> Not for reasons such as allowing patches like this.
>
Ok.
> Making all bu
On 13 August 2013 19:59, Julien Cristau wrote:
> [why oh why are you breaking threading?]
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 19:51:52 +0200, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
>> We have build log analyzers running for the build logs. And the
>> important compiler warnings (errors) fail
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libinotify-kqueue
Version : upstream snapshot from 20120419
Upstream Author : Dmitry Matveev
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue
* License : MIT/BSD
Description
On 23 August 2013 00:38, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:52:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
>> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
>> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>>
>> >From the manpage:
>>
>>dgit [dgit-o
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocaml-estring
Version : git snapshot
Upstream Author : Jeremie Dimino
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/diml/estring
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Description : Estring: OCaml development
On 31 May 2013 22:44, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> It's pretty much equivalent with one exception – I need to send USR2 on
> reload. Does upstart already have the support for custom reload signals?
>
Upstart 1.10 released today has the following new stanza thus you will
be able to specify:
"reload sign
On 25 August 2013 12:04, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
>> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>>
>> >From the manpage:
>>
>>dgit [dgit-opts] clone [
On 22 August 2013 20:52, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>
I have now started daily PPA builds for dgit, for all supported Ubuntu releases.
add-apt-repository ppa:xnox/dgit
Si
On 25 August 2013 17:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:51:31PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I have maintenance access to UDD & have filed a few bugs about it, and
>> all I can say is that dgit so far is getting a lot of things right:
>
>
&
On 12 August 2013 01:51, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> 3. all file names must be valid UTF-8
>
Case in point errors from ubuntu UDD package importer:
"""
Packages containing non-UTF-8, non-ASCII filenames. This is a problem.
It is unclear how to sensibly map these into Bazaar.
anon-proxy aspell-is as
On 28 August 2013 21:58, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello Debian world,
>
> there is currently a discussion within the FTP Team and we appear to
> have two opinions on it. As we are open on the outcome and it basically
> affects the whole project, we came up with the following summary to
> solicit fee
On 29 August 2013 10:55, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/8/29 Dmitrijs Ledkovs :
>> Can dinstall be run every hour please? For me, if anything dinstall is
>> not frequent enough.
>
> No, dinstall takes more than an hour to finish...
>
Ok.
>> If it takes longer t
On 30 August 2013 20:55, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> [...] using git instead of the file system for storing the contents
>> of Debian Code Search. The hope was that it would lead to fewer disk
>> seeks and less data due to gits delta-encoding
>
> Wouldn't ZFS be a more natural way to do s
Dear YunQiang Su,
It looks like this class of problems is reported against a lot of
packages now. Did you consult on debian-devel before doing this mass
bug filing?
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
On 17 September 2013 11:34, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: flash-kernel
> Version: 3.11
> X-Debbugs-CC: wzss..
please ignore this thread.
I've now noticed these bug reports were raised to debian-devel in the
" link with -L/usr/lib" thread.
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
On 18 September 2013 02:54, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Dear YunQiang Su,
>
> It looks like this class of problems is r
On 18 September 2013 03:42, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
>> as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but
>> allow the bugs opened for t
On 11 October 2013 20:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 726009 serious
> thanks
>
> This remains a serious bug. Your package, which previously built on
> multiple architectures, is now failing to build due to memory exhaustion.
> While in some circumstances it is permissible to remove the old
On 11 October 2013 22:34, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:55:34PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm not sure, but launchpad is running 64-bit machines even when
>> compiling for the i386 architecture, and then launchpad supports PAE
>>
On 24 October 2013 10:59, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:11:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:09:46AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> > And I for one heavily use vservers
>>
>> It's a professional shame of mine that we are still trying to get rid
On 24 October 2013 14:18, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> Hello,
> I've written a tool to import Debian packages into Git:
>
> git clone deb::mypackage
>
> It does a faithful import of the package history from
> snapshot.debian.org. There is some agressive caching built-in, and a
> bit of logic
On 24 October 2013 15:15, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
> Le 24/10/2013 15:57, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>> On 24 October 2013 14:18, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I've written a tool to import Debian packages into Git:
>>>
>>> gi
On 24 October 2013 17:38, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 18:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> What's the the status of XFCE regarding accessibility?
>>
>> That was a big strengh of GNOME for a long time, though I've heard
>> rumors (sorry not to be more specific) that gnome-shell
Hello,
On 25 October 2013 07:23, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:18:18AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> Changed-By: Andreas Moog [...]
>> away (0.9.5+ds-0+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* Non-maintainer upload
>> - d/p/01_fix_makefile: $LIBS need to
On 25 October 2013 10:00, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:33:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Seems I misunderstood what logind was about. I thought it would force to
>> use specific Xdm implementations that would support it. So you do
>> confirm that it's not the case, and th
On 25 October 2013 13:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/10/13 11:52, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> - using XDG_* environment variables, instead of LOGIND_* or SYSTEMD_*
>> variables
>
> I assume you mainly mean XDG_RUNTIME_DIR here, since the rest are
> basically user-level
On 1 November 2013 13:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If cross-architecture dependencies are allowed in the archive (and don't
> break dak or britney) these days, then it's easy:
>
> Package: libnss-mdns
> Architecture: any
> Multi-Arch: same
>
> Package: lib32nss-mdns
> Architectu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name: openerp6
Version : 6.0.3
Upstream Author : OpenERP S.A
* URL : http://www.openerp.com/
* License : AGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Enterprise Resource Management
On 12 October 2012 13:03, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'm struggling to see what point you believe you're making here.
>
The point he was trying to make that he either caught a mirror during
update, or his connection was flaky, as he didn't fetch the complete
file, nor verify it's gpg signature.
Re
On 12 October 2012 13:52, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:46:41 +0200
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> The workflow doesn't have to involve Launchpad either - I'm not using
>> Launchpad at all for my Debian packages. Just because the majority of
>> Bazaar users host their branches on Lau
On 15 October 2012 18:46, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>>> If so, please submit
>>> bugs, and we will look at fixing them. Otherwise, speculation gets us
>>> nowhere and actually wastes time.
>> Well I had once a discussion (around Marc
On 17 October 2012 03:05, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2012, at 1:03 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> On Oct 12, 2012, at 02:22 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>
>>> How does bzr-builddeb depend on Launchpad? bzr is integrated into
>>> Launchpad, but you can use bzr without Launchpad as e
On 17 October 2012 19:30, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Joerg Jaspert writes:
>> Its for after wheezy, definitely.
>> Also, there are some open issues to be solved for this to happen.
>> The most important is being able to deal with arch all packages. And
>> worse - arch all packages able to b
On 17 October 2012 22:55, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Paul,
>
> am Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:48:39PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> > With the danger of being sued if you put up the result onto the public
>> > interwebs.
>> Could you please expand on that? Logo / trademark reasons or license
>> i
On 17 October 2012 09:57, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> For git we have gitweb, gitolite, git-daemon, pristine-tar.
> I'd like to have similar for bzr, hg and svn.
>
bzr-builddeb gives pristine-tar support
bzr serve is the equivalent of git-daemon and it is builtin
loggerhead is replacement for gitweb
On 18 October 2012 07:27, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
>> loggerhead is replacement for gitweb
>
> As one of the alioth admins, I'd like to contest this statement.
>
> loggerhead is a replacement for gitweb in the same way that crawling is
> a re
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
