On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not the
> content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it with the
> email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who signs their email
> with a key
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:25:05PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not
> > > the content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it
> > > with the email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who
> > > signs their email
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:22:53PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I'd be in favor of a different approach: moderate debian-devel. Not the
> > > content, but the list of people allowed to post. Pre-seed it with the
> > > email adresses in our keyring and auto-add anybody who signs their email
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> > But all Debian Contributors have their OpenPGP key in the
> > project's keyring. No?
> Most certainly not.
> Parts where many people who is not DD nor DM takes part include docs,
> web, translations and graphics.
I think th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > I know. So? If the first email of a non-DD gets delayed for a few hours,
> > > that's an acceptable price to pay IMHO.
> > Nothing about delays wasn't mentioned in your previous email
> Moderating (some) emails to d-d implies
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:04:05AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> It is very sad to see that contributors sometimes feel that the only
> option for them is to resign.
>
> Would it be worthwhile giving people another option, for example,
> allowing a percentage of DDs to formally veto decisions? Wo
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > Please no.
> >
> > We need less and not more layers of governance/'political' complexity
> > in project. Lets stop acting like government and more like community.
> If a veto facility is created effectively, then it will deter peop
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:44:50PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > You're expecting people proposing GRs to be receptive to rational
> > argument.
> >
> > I fear you've not been paying close attention recently. Well
> > done. I congratulate you on your wisdom.
> If rational argument is not necess
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:24:13AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > > This decision has been made in gross violation of constitution §6.3.6,
> > > being summoned to override a maintainer’s choice while the solution
> > > was still under discussion.
> > >
> > > I urge the systemd maintaine
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:07:02PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Please excuse a little excursion into the inhomogeneity of signalling
> > services from logrotate. I did a little bit of research and came up
> > with the following numbers (sid i386+all main):
>
> > -> 360 packages shipping logrot
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> I am rather dazzled that while there is working source package
> of wine-1.5 ready, other people are working on gradually packaging
> wine-1.1.x releases;
I'm surprised that not everyone involved is such dazzled.
> Also, it seems
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:27:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> As a side note: One problem with wine is that it needs 32bit libraries
> on amd64 and the state of ia32-libs. Ia32-libs does have some bugs open
> concerning wine, specifically it doesn't allow building wine from source
> (agai
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:16:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > The giant endless flamewars on debian-devel required to make a decision to
> > change anything. :)
> IIRC, last time we discussed this I think that even the exim maintainers
> were in favour of the change...
What were the reasons?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:24:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > They may be useless without additional data, but this is the same as
> > drivers that are useless without additional hardware.
> I don't buy this analogy - usually, drivers are programmed for existing
> (or soon-to-be-existing) hard
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
>
> I'm for having openvz back, then.
Are you ready to do the required work?
> Can we have this in a separate thread, please?
Do we have any practical results
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:59:31PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> See my other answer. This is conceptually wrong, because you might
> end up with a *wrong* patch and the old one is destroyed due to the
> refresh (patch just messed it up .. and I didn't realize it, uuups).
Why don't you use a VCS
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:05:21AM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
> I just discovered that debuild does not behave as I would expect from
> the maintainer's guide [1]:
>
> | Cleaning the source and rebuilding the package from your user account
> | is as simple as:
> | $ debuild
> [...]
> | You can c
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Eventually (wheezy+2? +3?) we would stop building a kernel package for
> > > > i386.
> > >
> > > As in drop the i386 arch?
> >
> > No, keep i386 userland only. Though we might consider reducing even
> > that to a 'partial archi
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:19:09PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > By the way, are there plans to drop the support of the i386 architecture
> > with
> > kFreeBSD as well ?
> I thought we were discussing amd64 being the default architecture for new
> installations, rather than the removal of the i
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:14:49PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Just curious…
>
> I thought one is supposed to use Multi-Arch now, and that
> biarch/triarch can finally go away.
>
> Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those
> packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:22:24AM +0300, Serge wrote:
> What's a temporary file? Really, why would applications temporarily store
> its data in a file? They do that to *free some memory*. Placing those files
> back to memory renders the whole process of writing the file useless.
> If the files are
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:22:20AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > > What's a temporary file? Really, why would applications temporarily store
> > > its data in a file? They do that to *free some memory*. Placing those
> > > files
> > > back to memory renders the whole process of writing the file us
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 03:50:31PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> /tmp on tmpfs won't help in that case. You do not reduce number of disk
> writes, you just move them to other directories. As you suggested, all
> the programs will still use files i.e. in /var/tmp. Or they'll write to
> swap if tmpfs is larg
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:08:37PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> > Why do you assume tmpfs contents is always written to the swap?
>
> Most programs, using /tmp for temporary files, may write *large* files
> there. So most programs fill tmpfs with large files. So tmpfs grows and
> swaps out (probably swap
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 03:24:02AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > /tmp 8,0G 60M 8,0G1% /tmp
> > Does this count as "large files"?
> > As "a lot of small-only files"?
> >
> Exactly how is this a practical explanation and example? :/
> Are you saying that in *
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:47:37PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>> /tmp 8,0G 60M 8,0G1% /tmp
> >>> Does this count as "large files"?
> >>> As "a lot of small-only files"?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Exactly how is this a practical explanation and example? :/
>
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:02:37AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a non-free package that is distributable but comes precompiled
> for i386. Squeeze (and previous) released an amd64 package that
> depended on ia32-libs. For wheezy we've been able to use multiarched
> libraries to d
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:46:46PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Not sure what to say other than when I became a DD and gained the
> power to NMU, I started fixing this. Before that, Ove's contributor
> rejections blocked myself and many other non-DDs from effectively
> helping.
I would also be
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:41:42PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > You mean, besides completely hijacking the package?
> >
> > The last maintainer upload is dated 2010/05/23.
> >
> > So, from my POV, you (Michael) and Hilko Bengen seem to be the real
> > package maintainers for wine.
> >
> > My s
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:16:26PM +0200, Steven Post wrote:
> Reading this I assume ia32-libs will be removed from Debian (with which
> I completely agree btw), what about packages outside of Debian that
> currently depend upon ia32-libs? To name a certain package: skype. Its
> AMD64 package from
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:01:29AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
> is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
> think we should consider changelog (and copyright as long as it's in
> machine parseable fo
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> I have read the output of lintian-info -t about
> hardening-no-fortify-functions, and it helps a lot. The software uses
> Cmake as build tool, and the "hardening-wrapper" solution solved some
> lintian warnings, but not the l
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:42:33PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> > Why do you need hardening-wrapper? You should use flags set by
> > dpkg-buildflags.
> Because that
> (http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Notes_for_packages_using_CMake),
> referred by lintian-info too. Using it I only need to
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:04:46PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> > I see several solutions there, and the hardening-wrapper one is in my
> > opinion the worst one: it adds a build dependency and it uses own set of
> > configuration variables, not compatible with dpkg-buildflags ones.
> Yes
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:28:26PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > It is *easy* to use. It works out of the box. I don't need to tell
> > people how to use it and what to install. It works with various other
> > devices. And so on. I do not believe that your question was serious
> > anyway.
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:11:52PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> >> > It is *easy* to use. It works out of the box. I don't need to tell
> >> > people how to use it and what to install. It works with various other
> >> > devices. And so on. I do not believe that your question was serious
> >> > any
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:08:50PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> > (http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Notes_for_packages_using_CMake),
> > referred by lintian-info too. Using it I only need to define "export
> > DEB_BUILD_HARDENING=1" on my debian/rules and it adds the CPPFLAGS to
> > CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS (C
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:06:02PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> but i always get:
> W: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks: hardening-no-fortify-functions
> usr/lib/kde4/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks.so
As the extended tag description suggests, refer to
http://bugs.debian.org/673112 for the discussion of f
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> We really need to find better ways to involve new users in core teams,
> and that means removing from our collective consciousness the idea that
> you come in Debian to package your new favorite piece of software.
Unfortunately dif
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as
> provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then?
Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the
package).
> Or will Debian accept an binary with the
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:55:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments
> > > to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort
> > > of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 03:38:25PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> systemd may seem better in /most/ cases because it does have some nice
> features, but I don't think it's better in *all* cases. systemd doesn't
> allow
> shutdown/reboot from within KDE4
That doesn't sound like an inherent systemd
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > So yes, we have the problem for precompiled windows DLLs in a source
> > package.
>
> Interesting, that issue seems rather common. Maybe a lintian check
> could alarm packagers of this?
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-cont
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 04:43:51PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > So yes, we have the problem for precompiled windows DLLs in a source
> > > package.
> >
> > Interesting, that issue seem
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:34:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> So I finally managed to get my C++ symbols file generated. However
> before shooting myself in the foot, I'd like to know if I need to
> generate the symbol file using -fvisibility=hidden or not ?
Theoretically, it is much bette
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:52:52PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Not to "to knock 'em when they're down", but since it seems that the CIA.vc
> service has officially closed recently (cannot find exactly when did that
> happen)
http://shadowm.rewound.net/blog/archives/245-CIA.vc-is-dead.html
http:/
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:44:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would like to save the effort to upload that. And if somebody wants to nmu
> that, please just append dfsg to the version, not +dfsg. +dfsg is annoyingly
> popular, but prevents updates of something like 2.64.1.
$ dpkg --compare-
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:07:16PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >Please also keep in mind that many upstream projects ship systemd service
> >files. Therefore, most of the systemd work is already done too.
>
> Are those any better than init scripts shipped by upstream? How many
> Debian packages use
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> You're right, in that the "interface" that a user has to exim-on-debian is
> update-exim4.conf.conf, rather than exim4's configuration directly; however,
> length aside, I don't see this as a strength, but a serious source of
> con
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:31:43PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julien Danjou
>
> * Package name: python-first
> Version : 2.0.0
> Upstream Author : Hynek Schlawack
> * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/first
> * License
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME
> > >> bumps...
> > >
> > > It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 vs perl6.
> >
> > The point i
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
> bug severities entirely.
Life for the maintainer or for the user?
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
> > bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> > we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
>
> This is important for apt-
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for
> > > > >> SONAME
> > > > >> bumps...
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a massive new major release. Think
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:40:17PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > > > It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply
> ignores
> > > > bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
> > > > we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
> > >
> > > This is i
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> > Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't,
> > there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package
> > starts
> > to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like ope
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:32:20PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >>> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
> >>
> >> I do not like to use browsers. Especially to report bugs.
> >
> >Likewise, however bug reporting in Debian is only done via email not
> >via a web browser. You can either use the reportb
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Nick Andrik wrote:
> Since AGPLv3 is really similar to GPLv3 but mostly oriented for
> webapplications, would it make sense to contact Oracle with the
> concerns raised in this thread and ask for clarification and possible
> consideration to change to licen
.
Enjoy!
[1] https://github.com/lvc/abi-dumper
[2] https://github.com/lvc/abi-compliance-checker
--
Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Markus Raab wrote:
Hello!
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
There is a new simple way to track changes in API/ABI of system
libraries using a new ABI dumper [1] tool.
Thanks for the tipp!
However, this approach has some drawbacks. Perhaps the main drawback is
the inability to perform some
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 01:05:21PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Has anyone considered asking Google to distribute separately the flash
> plugin?
I think you need to ask Adobe, not Google.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/usr/include/libgrip/gripinputdevice.h
/usr/include/libgrip/gripgesturemanager.h
/usr/lib/libgrip.so
But I haven't gotten far enough to have this working automagically as
dep8 tests.
DEP-8 tests are per-package, I want something that would work for
every package that includes a
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 06:33:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It's about the same on the other side when Lennart tells about Systemd
> "debunking myths".
If this wasn't about systemd, I'd ask for some arguments here.
But as all systemd discussions are full of FUD anyway, it won't help much
here
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:50:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems
> >
> >> "friendly upstream yes no NO YES"
> >
> > Really? You put something like this in a technical comparison chart?
>
> I wasn't the one who wrote
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:47:27PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> It's about the same on the other side when Lennart tells about Systemd
> >> "debunking myths".
> > I'd ask for some arguments here.
>
> This has already been discussed. You can look in the archive.
I don't think so.
--
WBR, wRA
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:36:22AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The migration notification is in error; it's a bug in the script that
> generates the notifications, that doesn't ignore extra entries included
> in the Sources files added by the archive management software in order
> to help with
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Trust dak instead:
> | kibi@arya:~$ ssh release.debian.org dak ls grub2 -s testing
Permission denied (publickey).
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02:10AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Trust dak instead:
> > > | kibi@arya:~$ ssh release.debian.org dak ls grub2 -s testing
> > Permission denied (publickey).
>
> For those having missed [1,2], how much time exactly does one need
> to find coccia.d.o on machines.c
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:15:29PM +, adrelanos wrote:
> >> This question is about Virtual Box / Debian / screen resolution without
> >> having guest additions installed.
> >
> > I see, is there any reason to not do that?
>
> Security reasons. It weakens isolation between guest and host. See
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:42:32AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> ~/afni-0.20130830~dfsg.1/build-x86_64-linux-gnu/avovk# gcc --param
> ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat-security -g -O2
> -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_ztrsv'
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_scasum'
> > If y
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:00:57AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > So basically a variation of the old problem of calling memcpy when one
> > meant to use memmove. I'm actually surprised that type of call to sprintf
> > ever worked reliably with optimization, even without _FORTIFY_SOURCE.
> > But,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:18:03AM +0400, Norbert Preining wrote:
> since a short time when I build a binary package on my running system, I
> cannot install the created .deb anymore because it depends on
>libc-amd64 (>= some.version)
> which somehow is not what I have although I am running am
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:39:58AM +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
> > > >This falsely implies that sticking with Gnome requires replacing the
> > > >init system. The only requirement is that systemd is installed, not
> > > >that it is used as the init system.
> > >
> > > That may be the case today,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:43:04PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Would LXDE still fit on the same CD? I'm guessing yes, but I'd rather
> > have it explicit.
> >
>
> Why are we still talking about CDs? Didn't everybody move to DVDs a century
> ago?
And then they moved away from DVDs too.
I gu
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > > Why are we still talking about CDs? Didn't everybody move to DVDs a
> > century
> > > ago?
> > And then they moved away from DVDs too.
> > I guess we are talking about install images to download (where you usually
> > don't
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:57:50AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The usefulness of supporting --as-needed isn't because of Ubuntu. It's
> > > because switching --as-needed on across the board
> >
> > I think it would be better send all our upstreams patches for their
> > build systems than to
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> [...] non-Linux UNIX flavours - which I think Debian should support for
> ethical and philosophical reasons.
Uh-oh.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:58:16PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> How about Gentoo, Slackware, LFS and many many others?
What's that?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Boris shtrasman wrote:
> any ideas how can I do that without breaking kde ?
Use squeeze?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
2011/11/17, Steve McIntyre :
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Andrey Gursky wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>As with almost each weekly-build DVD I was about to update one of my
>>PCs not connected to internet. But this time it has failed:
>>
>># apt-cdrom add
2011/11/17, Steve McIntyre :
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Andrey Gursky wrote:
>>2011/11/17, Steve McIntyre :
>>>
>>> Looks like a bug in apt, as far as I can see - pkgTagFile::Resize()
>>> has a hard-coded internal maximum buffer size
been tracked as
wishlist bug #583528 since May 2010 [2].
Is there enough time left to have this updated before the Wheezy freeze
window?
Thanks,
Jon
[1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libconfig.html
[2]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583528
-- Andrey Ponomarenko
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:38:10AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > > All admins I know have at least some servers with custom kernels (in the
> > > past it was said, to build your firewall/server kernels without module
> > > support, so that no rootkit module could be loaded).
> >
> > No longer neede
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > It is a good thing to run with minimum privs, but compiling a new kernel to
> > support this seems to be a lot of work for a fairly small benefit.
> First of all it is quite a significant benefit. And you get quite some
> other a
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Andrey Rahmatullin [111227 07:53]:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > > It is a good thing to run with minimum privs, but compiling a new
> > > > kernel
://pkgdiff.github.com/pkgdiff/
[2]
http://pkgdiff.github.com/pkgdiff/pkgdiff_reports/libqb/0.4.1_to_0.8.1/compat_report.html
--
Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:08:03PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> A new tool for package maintainers has been released today: pkgdiff
> [1] - a tool for analyzing changes in Linux software packages (DEB,
> RPM, TAR.GZ, etc). The output of the tool is an HTML rep
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 03:08:03PM +0400, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
Hello list,
A new tool for package maintainers has been released today: pkgdiff
[1] - a tool for analyzing changes in Linux software packages (DEB,
RPM, TAR.GZ, etc). The output of the tool is an HTML
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:12:37AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > While the waf behavour does sound quite awful, is this really any
> > different than the current behaviour of the autotools? The "configure"
> > script is an unreadable mess generated by the expansion of macros in the
> > autotools
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:47:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >>> While the waf behavour does sound quite awful, is this really any
> >>> different than the current behaviour of the autotools? The
> >>> "configure" script is an unreadable mess generated by the expansion of
> >>> macros in the au
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:47:45PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> There are some results of the rebuild of the Debian archive with clang:
> http://clang.debian.net/
> http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2012/02/29/rebuild_of_the_debian_archive_with_clang
That's very interesting, thanks!
I c
it in with other
tools.
Scott K
I do not agree. This tool can be used to compare any text-based files
and produce pretty HTML reports. For example, I'm using it to publish
differences in C header files on the web:
http://upstream-tracker.org/diffs/barry/0.16_to_0.17.0/diff.html
--
Andrey P
it in with other
tools.
Scott K
I do not agree. This tool can be used to compare any text-based files
and produce pretty HTML reports. For example, I'm using it to publish
differences in C header files on the web:
http://upstream-tracker.org/diffs/barry/0.16_to_0.17.0/diff.html
--
Andrey P
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:25:17AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Ubuntu's version of debhelper includes changes to maintainer scripts to
> avoid calling update-rc.d for sysvinit scripts when there is a
> corresponding Upstart job, from which I infer that Upstart does not do
> the same as systemd?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:31 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:25:17AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Ubuntu's version of debhelper includes changes to maintainer scripts
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Michael Welle wrote:
> I just tried to report a bug. To show how one can reproduce
> the bug I needed an url, I chose www.foo.org for that purpose.
You have example.com just for that.
> :
> 140.211.15.34 failed after I sent the message.
> Remote host said:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:20:04AM +0200, Michael Welle wrote:
> >> I just tried to report a bug. To show how one can reproduce
> >> the bug I needed an url, I chose www.foo.org for that purpose.
> > See RFC2606.
> so you suggest a Debian user should consult RFCs before reporting a bug
> in some so
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:22:59AM +0200, Michael Welle wrote:
> >> I just tried to report a bug. To show how one can reproduce
> >> the bug I needed an url, I chose www.foo.org for that purpose.
> > You have example.com just for that.
> >
> >> :
> >> 140.211.15.34 failed after I sent the message.
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:14:25PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to ship
> > systemd unit files.
> It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write and support
> init/systemd/whatsoever scripts sutable for many distributi
101 - 200 of 1182 matches
Mail list logo
