Re: Bug#1033747: chromium: Build Chromium without the embedded libtiff

On 7/29/24 16:10, Soren Stoutner wrote: On Monday, July 29, 2024 1:18:05 AM MST Andres Salomon wrote: It's unfortunately going to have to wait. We're switching standard libraries, and linking to external libs is a bit rocky right now. Waiting until things settle is fine. This h

Re: Security updates for sarge?

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 05:10:26 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: > Heck, If I were a DD, I would be glad to help whereever needed. The most > pressing bits seem to be (from my POV): > 1) buildd network (especially because of sarge/security) > 2) ftpmaster (seems to be overwhelmed in work for months now) >

Re: Ubuntu discussion at planet.debian.org

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:28:20 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> Is there really a developer out there that doesn't do even the most >> rudimentary VC by keeping copies of all the source packages he has >> uploaded/worked on ? > > What for? You can always

Re: Updated SELinux Release

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:15:44 +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:02:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:15:38 -0500, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 19:21 +, Dhruv Gami wrote: >> >> Personally

Re: Updated SELinux Release

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:57:52 +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] > response 3: _is_ it the job of debian developers to dictate the minimum > acceptable security level? It is the job of the kernel team to maintain the kernel. That includes ensuring the kernel runs correctly and quic

Re: Always run dpkg --dry-run -i before running dpkg -i!

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:15:53 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: >> Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone >> into his shell and refuses to discuss this problem. > > Btw, could anyone explain why ndisw

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:45:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > > Architectures that are no longer being considered for stable releases > are not going to be left out in the cold. The SCC infrastructure is > intended as a long-term option for these other architectures, and the > ftpmasters also

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:32:42 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: [...] > > I'm a bit disappointed how the decision has been made. I would have *Is* it a decision, or is it a proposal? The wording is unclear. > hoped that Debian as an organization would be able to reach a workable, > rough consensus

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:15:16 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:54:09 -0500, Andres Salomon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:32:42 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> I'm a bit disappointed how the decision has been made. I would

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:59:43 +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On Luan, 2005-03-14 at 16:16 +0100, David Schmitt wrote: >> On Monday 14 March 2005 12:05, Robert Lemmen wrote: >> > - there must be a way for a scc arch to get a stable release. why don't >> > we either keep testing for scc archs b

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:45:10 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:16:19AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: [...] >> >> What about the *massive* issues with releasing d-i due to syncing on all >> arch's? What about the various arch-specific kernel issues that have popped >> up > > T

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:42:20 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: [...] > > - Both in public[0] and in private, Martin Pitt (acting in an Ubuntu role) > and others from the Ubuntu community have been collaborating with the > Debian security team on patches for a wide range of vulnerabilities > Yes,

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:19:32 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: [...] > > You'll figure out that the timing for this new policy is absolutely > perfect; we're a week away from the voting period for the new DPL > term. The current DPL can't (and won't, obviously) do anything about > it, and the candidate

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:03:46 -0600, John Goerzen wrote: [...] > There is no longer going to be any such thing as a standard Debian > installation. Each box, and each snapshot, could have different > versions of important packages -- everything from glibc to KDE or Gnome. > The user experience will

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:14:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:10:30PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:42:20 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: >> [...] >> > >> > - Both in public[0] and in private, Martin Pitt (acting in

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:02:07 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: [...] > This would be a lot like the current amd64 effort, but with more > formalized procedures. If the porters can't do it, their arch won't > block the release process, but if they work hard enough, they can > release together wit

Re: debian/kernel security issues (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:51:30 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:50:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: [...] > >> To have proper security-in-testing-or-unstable for the kernel, the >> debian-kernel security team, or at least a few members of it, need to be made >> aware of the e

Re: debian/kernel security issues (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:19 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:21:21AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: >> Sven Luther wrote: [...] >> > >> > This is not a ubuntu related problem though, and the help the ubuntu >> > kernel/security team has provided us was invaluable, but it should ma

Re: debian/kernel security issues (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:38:48 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:19 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:21:21AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: >>> Sven Luther wrote: > [...] >>> > >>> > This is not a ubuntu

Re: debian/kernel security issues (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:14:07 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:38:48 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:19 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:21:21AM -0500, Joey Hess wr

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib)

On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:00 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: [...] > > First, I couldn't find any reference to a "GPLed NDIS driver" in ndiswrapper's > website, like Michael Poole asserts: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00381.html > I assume he was talking about the CIPE drive

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib)

On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 23:48 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:40:10PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:00 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > First, I couldn't find any reference to a "

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main

On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 11:34 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 19, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nevertheless, if you think abiword and openoffice.org should be moved then > > go > > for it. Just don't use them as excuse to turn warez wrappers into "generic" > > driver interfac

removal of svenl from the project

Hi, I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed from the project. The process is outlined here: , and I have already completed step 1. Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers. I am attemptin

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > Sven has always been a nuisance to deal w/, but up until now I have not > considered this action. In the past two weeks, the following comments > made by him have changed my mind: > > 2006-03-07: > jonas: i h

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > > from the project. The process is outlined here: > > <

Re: removal of svenl from the project

The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process: http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt This is a lot from two weeks ago,

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:47:14PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: [...] > > > oh and btw, as you noted it, I attacked you personnaly, maybe you should > begin a procedure to expulse me. > > There's a vast amount of difference between (your) intentional trolling and unintentional, repeated abus

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:20:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]: [...] > > > > I'm asking myself what's behind all that ? Ubuntu ? Probably no. > > Subconcious fear to delivery in time ? Probably yes. Stop thinking > > about

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 00:59 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:45:42PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:20:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > > also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]: > &

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: [...] > > In the meantime, we are wasting precious DD and DAM time to satisfy > Andres' need for a revenge on Sven. > *Sigh*. This has absolutely *nothing* to do w/ "revenge on Sven". Sven himself has stated that he doesn't underst

Re: Ubuntu Patches

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:32:54 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The only distinction here is between merely publishing the patches on our >> website, and pushing the patch to the Debian maintainer immediately. We >> publish all of our patches rela

Re: Why do we still have this on the distribution?

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:09:21 -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:56:25PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: >> The fact that Adam Conrad just made an upload yesterday to fix bugs in >> the package seems to indicate that he at least feels that it is >> useful. [Or at least, I *hope* tha

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:50:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> > Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2 >> > is scheduled for the end of 20

Re: acenic firmware rewrite

On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:11:38 +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > Hi, > > Reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00078.html I > wondered if people would be willing to work on a free firmware for the > Tigon II chip. I didn't look at the existing code yet, but looking at the >

Re: acenic firmware rewrite

On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:26:09 +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: [...] > Sure. That's ok. I was more thinking of someone reading the existing > firmware sources, writing a spec and a second person/group implementing > the new free firmware based on the spec. AFAICS the implementors and the > spe

Re: Status of PHP5?

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:56:52 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote: > Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Debian has more than 900 developers, a minimum amount of cooperation >> is necessary... > > May I then ask why the maintainers of PHP4 hasn't joined the > discussion? I think it would b

Re: updated cogito package - now with docs!

On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:05:28 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > The upstream now includes docs for the GIT core, though still not for > Cogito. The docs are available in .txt and .html, and they _would_ > be available as manpages except for a bug in asciidoc. The asciidoc > maintainer has been

Re: new cogito package, OpenSSL license issue resolved

On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:44:05 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included > GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly) > GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code. Thanks to Florian Weimer and Anibal > Monsalve Salaza

wiki.debian.net brokenness?

Hi, I've discovered that I can no longer log into wiki.debian.net. When visiting pages, it informs me that I'm AnonymousUser; when I try to edit a page, it tells me that the web page doesn't not allow anonymous editing. However, it doesn't provide a link to log in (or maybe I'm just missing the

Re: Bits from the dpkg maintainer

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:05:56 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: [...] > > * The "Debian Diff" may be replaced by the "Debian Tar": > Instead of placing your changes and Debian directory as a patch against > the upstream tarball in a diff.gz, you may instead ship the Debian > d

Re: arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:52:32 +0900, akira yamada wrote: [...] > And if you are maintaining packages which have extension libraries, > please rebuild and upload it to Debian. > > Please file bugs against extensions; lots of people don't read d-d. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ndiswrapper update

Hi, I've redone the packaging for ndiswrapper, starting with 1.8-2. My goal is to allow utils packages to be installed in parallel, and to allow a smooth upgrade from both 1.1-4 (the version that's in sarge) and 1.8-1 (the version that's in sid). If you are running ndiswrapper 1.8-1, please upgr

orphaning gitweb

Hi, I'm going to orphan gitweb; I haven't used it in a long time, and I've been doing a poor job of keeping it up-to-date. It doesn't have any bugs open on it; it just needs the occasional update (and the one patch I've done for it should be fed upstream if they're willing to take it). Who wants

Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:05:00 -0600, Matthew Dempsky wrote: [...] > If a new version of ndiswrapper-utils is not backwards-compatible with > an old version of ndiswrapper-modules, shouldn't it declare a > versioned Conflicts with those older versions or else when you try to > upgrade you'll have pro

Re: Help me test new pcmcia-cs

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:00 +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: [...] > > It would be very nice if you could help me test it before I upload it > to sid. Since I've done a lot of changes, I suspect that there might > be some bugs in it. And don't forget to read NEWS.Debian and > README.Debian. > Works w

Re: LVM packages up for adoption

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:28:56 +, Patrick Caulfield wrote: > What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly > think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up > for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job. > > The pack

Re: LVM packages up for adoption

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:11:50 +, Tim Cutts wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2005, at 4:06 pm, Patrick Caulfield wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +, Tim Cutts wrote: >>> >>> On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfi

Re: Avifile package - help needed

Just out of curiousity.. Does it work w/ 2.4.0-test11 and above? Something in avifile checks /proc/cpuinfo for the "flags" entry, which was renamed in test11 (I don't remember the new name for it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running 2.4.0 could tell you). Thus, it would die immediately for me.

Re: BIND 9.X package status

...and bind9 is going to be run as non-root by default, right? :) On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:58:51PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > BIND 9 source package in non-US because it's DFSG-free but has crypto > code, including only BIND, producing binary packages > > bind9

Re: lvm2 maintainer needed

Despite claims otherwise, I'm actually alive, w/ experimental packages at http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/lvm2/. Various things (bugs, loss of an internet connection, upstream developers going on vacation) have kept me from uploading; however, after talking w/ upstream, I'm going to do an upload

Re: lvm2 maintainer needed

Oh, also, the last upload was 5 months ago; I typo'd in the changelog, putting 2002 instead of 2003. :) On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:58, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago > and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer

Re: What is going on with udev?

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:18:01 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:02 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: >> Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point, >> my problem is with this "didn't you know, read X stupid!" approach. > > I don't think pointing at the mail

last change to save (adopt) some packages

those funny .par2 files off newgroups, this is the tool you need to actually make use of them. It's maintained upstream (afaict), but hasn't had a new release in a while. I'll orphan this one as well, if no one takes it. [1] http://rubyforge.org/projects/xml-tools/ [2] http://rubyfo

renaming mysql++

Hi, I intend to rename the binary packages for mysql++ with the upload of 2.0.5. They've been called libsqlplus* for a while now, which isn't overly intuitive (I've had multiple people not realize mysql++ was packaged for debian, due to the name). My choices are either libmysqlpp* (to match the l

Re: Best practices for kernel modules

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Hello all, > [...] > > There are two bugs against the OpenAFS package, one requesting prebuilt > modules (Bug#224527) and one requesting that modules be automatically > rebuilt when the kernel is upgraded (Bug#168852). I'm not sur

orphaning kazehakase

Hi, Is anyone interested in taking over kazehakase? kazehakase -- GTK+-base web browser that allows pluggable rendering engines It needs some serious love; upstream still appears to be somewhat active, but shifting gecko APIs and a lack of release in almost a year makes this more challenging tha

Bug#542123: O: mock -- Build rpm packages inside a chroot

Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Hi, I packaged mock for OLPC, but I'm no longer with OLPC. Someone else who uses the package (or wants to use it) should give it the love that it deserves. Package info: Mock creates chroots and builds rpms in them. I

Re: trac maintenance activity?

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:01:45 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:57:38 -0400 > Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is trac being actively maintained? I no longer use it, so I'd like > > to be removed from the uploaders list when s

Re: trac maintenance activity?

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:57:38 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > Hi, > > Is trac being actively maintained? I no longer use it, so I'd like to > be removed from the uploaders list when someone does the next upload. > If no one is maintaining it, it should really be orphaned.. &

ITP: ofono-phonesim -- Modem emulator used by the oFono mobile telephony stack

Package: wnpp Owner: Andres Salomon Severity: wishlist * Package name: ofono-phonesim Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : various * URL : http://www.ofono.org/ * License : GPL 2 Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : Modem emulator used by the oFono mobile

Re: Minimal kernel version raised to 2.6.27

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:08:08 +0100 m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote: > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier > than 2.6.27. > > If your packages have code needed to support old kernels, this is the > right time to clean it up. > > This means that lenny->squeeze u

Re: The status of libapache2-mod-perl2

> really cannot take on any new responsibilities until I know how life is going > to look like. Thus, I'm afraid I can't take over the package -- perhaps as > co-maintainer if you need me (although I'm skeptical of co-maintenance in > general), and of course as a user, but no

anyone in nyc tomorrow for a keysigning?

I have the chance to tag along on a (company) trip to one of our colo centers tomorrow (located at 25 Broadway, New York NY 10004-1010). Are any developers available tomorrow to sign keys in that general area? There don't appear to be any developers close to where I live (upstate ny/albany area).

Re: anyone in nyc tomorrow for a keysigning?

Ok, I got no takers, so I'm not bothering to go down today. However, there will be some more trips down to Manhatten in the next few weeks, so if any developers will be around to sign keys, please let me know. On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:40:53 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > I have the c

Debian Enterprise?

Over the past week, my boss and I have had discussions about the niche left by RedHat, and the possibility of working on a distribution/sub-project aimed at enterprise folks. The plan is to target those RedHat users and companies who are unwilling (or unable) to pay for RedHat Enterprise Linux, bu

Re: Debian Enterprise?

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:51:43 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:45:05AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> I can think of a few ways to offer the above. The first is a standalone >> distribution, based on debian but with various enhancements (not a nov

Re: Debian Enterprise?

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:55:36 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:45:05AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Over the past week, my boss and I have had discussions about the niche >> left by RedHat, and the possibility of working on a >> distribution

Re: New kernel headers break LVM build

You might be able to get away w/ simply including the lvm-specific kernel headers in your package, as long as the lower level asm stuff that it uses haven't changed their interface in 2.6. OTOH, it also might introduce subtle bugs. Maybe you're better off build-dep'ing. Sigh. I should probably

[debian enterprise] sub-project planning

I have discussed the idea of a Debian Enterprise sub-project with various people, and have concluded that it's a worthy goal. I have listed the technical reasons/goals for this sub-project below. Initial preparation for Debian Enterprise will take place within Debian itself, with the following sh

Re: [custom] The term "flavor" and encouraging work on Debian

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:58:28 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, when thinking about the terminology surrounding Debian > Subprojects, I thought about the term "flavor". I always liked that > term, because I find it very descriptive. > [...] > So I suggest the following terms: >

Re: [custom] Debian Enterprise - policies

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:01:09 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > (Really should read ahead further ... here are more, and all laid out > together) > > * DFSG Free Software only (I know this one will get debated, but this is > the whole point of Debian Enterprise - if you want proprietary software, >

Re: [custom] Debian Enterprise - packages

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:45:51 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > As per the recommendations from Bruce Perens' User Linux paper > http://userlinux.com/white_paper.html, this thread is to discuss the > applications within the bounded set of Debian Enterprise/ User Linux. I think discussing the favori

Re: Lustre File System Support?

Packaging Lustre has been on my mind for some time (I packaged intermezzo, but since that never really stabilized, I didn't upload it). I plan to play w/ it in a bit; if it hasn't been packaged at that point, I may do it. At this point, it has a lot more resources being put into its development th

Re: transition plan to gtk 2.0

Definitely not; sinek and gde both required some pretty extensive changes to function normally w/ gtk2.. On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 03:37:36AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > > > Some random packages use gtk 2.0 now. What is the transition > > plan to gtk 2.0? I think every library which depends on

Re: Apache2

Are there any plans for php support for apache2? I've played around w/ 2.0.40 and a php cvs snapshot from sometime last week, w/ good results; I'm looking forward to a php4-snapshot/php4-apache2 packages, or something along those lines. On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Thom May wrote: >

Re: MAKEDEV Replacement status

I'm still waiting for bdale to find time to look at the code I've released so far. I would like to know whether he likes the direction it's headed, before continuing.. On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 04:36:07PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote: > > I was just about to file a wishlist against makedev to get su

gconf breakage

Can someone please apply the patch from #157937 to gconf, and upload? Galeon is uninstallable, atm. I have a NMU package prepared for gconf, if no one fixes this soon. -- Buying a Unix machine guarantees you a descent into Hell. It starts when you plug the computer in and it won't boot. Yes, th

Re: No mod_perl for Apache 2.0.x in Debian ?

I assume you mean mod_perl2. This is in experimental: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libapache2-mod-perl2 I shall upload 1.99.08 in a bit. On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:08:13 +0200, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > Hello, > > See subject: is this package missing from our

Re: Many ports open by default

Why would you keep something around if you don't want to run it? Debian makes the (correct) assumption that if you've installed something, you want to run it. If i install bind, it will assume i want it to run. If i install exim, it will first configure it for me (prompting me), and then assume

Re: Many ports open by default

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:43:43PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:25:34AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Why would you keep something around if you don't want to run it? Debian > > makes the (correct) assumption that if you've installe

Re: About the current state of the Yum package in Lenny

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:08:49 +0100 Luk Claes wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a > > working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts > > of yum based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs. > >

Re: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 05:17:01 -0700 Andres Salomon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure > who's still interested in the package at this point (I know Corsac > isn't, so I didn't Cc him). I've creat

Re: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:39:54 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Saturday, August 01 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > > >> I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure > >> who's still interested in the package at this point (I kno

Re: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:39:08 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Saturday, August 08 2015, I wrote: > > >> I'll take a look at your branch once it's published. > > > > Thanks. I have just published it: > > > > > > > > This is *not*

Re: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:09:46 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:39:08 -0400 > > Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, August 08 2015, I wrote: > >> > &g

armhf NEON exception for chromium

Hi, The latest chromium is failing to build on armhf because upstream broke non-NEON builds. While that is technically an upstream bug, I'm not sure upstream is going to care enough to even accept a patch to fix it. I understand that the baseline for the armhf architecture is to not support N

Re: armhf NEON exception for chromium

On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 08:30:20 PM +02:00:00, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote: Any thoughts on this? Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is empty on armel ci.debian.net workers. (I'm failing to spot neon in the list of featur

Re: armhf NEON exception for chromium

On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 03:00:05 PM -04:00:00, Andres Salomon wrote: On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 08:30:20 PM +02:00:00, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote: Any thoughts on this? Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is empty on armel

Bug#1053256: ITP: bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean -- Firefox browser plugin to bypass various paywalls

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andres Salomon X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean Version : 3.3.5.0 Upstream Contact: https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234 * URL : https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:06:50 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > Stable (bullseye) still contains chromium 90, which has had many > security issues. Testing & unstable contain 93, and stable should really > be quickly updated via stable-security to at least chromium 93 (as its > alrea

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: Exactly that. I'd suggest anyone who's interested in seeing Chromium supported to first update it in unstable (and then work towards updated in bullseye-security). I started doing just th

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 12/13/21 5:31 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: Exactly that. I'd suggest anyone who's interested in seein

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 01:49:53 -0500 Andres Salomon wrote: > On 12/13/21 5:31 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > >>> Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 1/2/22 12:53 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: I've got 96.0.4664.110 building on both bullseye and sid Trying it, I see it still build-depends on python-jinja2. That package is now gone, so it's not actually builda

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and > > then deal with buster/bullseye? > > Yeah, let's proceed with

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:32:28 -0500 Andres Salomon wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100 > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and >

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

Thanks for testing! Are you doing this under sid? On 1/3/22 7:39 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: the v96 branch of https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium FWIW, I'm trying to build it myself as well Here it started chrashing as soo

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 1/4/22 11:46, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: [...] [413:413:0104/174404.300230:FATAL:render_process_host_impl.cc(4227)] Check failed: host->GetBrowserContext() == browser_context (0x645f47d0 vs. 0x658dcb30) Single-process mode does not support multiple browser contexts. Okay, that's

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

On 1/4/22 15:15, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:50:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: Okay, that's funny - appears to be a fatal error due to being run under gdb. Well, it was also crashing outside of gdb ^^ I pushed a commit to the skip-a11y-checks branch, please

  1   2   >