On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:50:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> > Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2 >> > is scheduled for the end of 2006 or 2007? >> >> ... so that the release team can plan ahead a bit? > > It's funny that the release team needs to know about transitions for > etch that might occur in 2006 now, while even the freeze date for sarge > isn't yet announced. >
It's also funny that people want debian to release so bad, and yet fight the release team at every announcement. I don't see a problem with wanting to know as much about transitions and migrations in advance as possible. I'm sure there will be additional transitions/migrations that come up during etch development, but the more the release team knows about, the better prepared they can be to propose deadlines and release estimates. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
