On Wednesday 01 December 2004 01:17, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 01:06 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:58:45PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:26 +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> > > > Hi again,
> > > >
> > > > perhaps to bring down t
On Thursday 02 December 2004 07:53, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> The package is currently sexist, in my opinion. I just hope that
> saying this loud enough will make the maintainers change their
> mind. If it does not, well the result will be another sexist thing in
> free software.
>
LOL, the pack
On Friday 04 March 2005 17:47, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> > > would have t
On Friday 20 June 2003 15:40, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > As i686 is already like ten(?) years old,
>
> I was intrigued by this statement and went to look it up.
>
> CPU: Released:
> -
> 80386 1985
On Friday 16 August 2002 15:51, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> -
> The Debian GCC 3.2 Transition Plan
>
> This is a proposal. You will be notified when this is a real plan
>
Nice plan all in all, although I am going to hate the new package names. Some
people talked about av
On Thursday 13 September 2001 11:07, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> deutsch de_DE.ISO-8859-1
> françaisfr_FR.ISO-8859-1
> french fr_FR.ISO-8859-1
> german de_DE.ISO-8859-1
> portuguese pt_PT.ISO-8859-1
> spanish es_ES.ISO-8859-1
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 23:08, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - the Norwegian and Swedish keymap (relative to US layout: <4>)
>
> All my keyboards (swedish) have it on AltGr + e. Shift + 4 is still
> the ¤-symbol (currency).
I suppose swedish and danish k
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 14:14, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> [Thanks for the help, ia64 now builds fine]
>
> This time it's sparc that don't build. See the build log for details,
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ogle&ver=0.8.2-4&arch=sparc&stamp=1
>011076373&file=log&as=raw,
>
>
Is this somekind of demonstration of how much shit is usually filtered, or did
someone open the floodgates by mistake?
On Friday 05 April 2002 08:43, ¹®¿ë¹Ì wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> &nb
>sp;
>http://nancho.starhana.com";> language="javascript" src="
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
