On Friday 04 March 2005 17:47, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It > > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you > > > would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves > > > you wrong there. If you use 'obfuscation' or in other words > > > 'readability' as measurement what source is then a lot of perl code > > > would not qualify in my eyes. > > > > Source code is commonly defined as "the author's most preferred source > > of making modifications". > > That's not the common definition but the GPL one. IMO the IOCCC stuff > is source, and it's unlikely the author wrote it in the final form. > But wouldn't that make the NV driver GPL incompatible even if considered open source? `Allan
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
