On 01/01/2025 18:27, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
Here’s a quick « benchmark » in a sid Plasma desktop qemu VM where I had a
snapshot of up-to-date sid from Nov 24th, upgrading to today’s sid :
Summary:
Upgrading: 658, Installing: 304, Removing: 58, Not Upgrading: 2
Download size: 0 B / 1 032
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ahmad Khalifa
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: hueplusplus
Version : 1.1.0 (describe: v1.1.0-9-g4d9e387)
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/enwi/hueplusplus/issues
* URL : https://github.com/enwi
On 09/12/2024 16:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 08:03:36AM -0600 schrieb rhys:
It's not the sort of thing that needs to be strictly updated like a man page or other technical document. It
just needs to be a couple of pages that describe the "general" (big picture structure an
On 12/12/2024 04:05, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Tue 10 Dec 2024 at 01:31pm GMT, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
As an outsider trying to help, the natural thing I looked at was the RFH
process to dip my toes into things.
But only 56 packages have RFH bugs and they're usually not very clear on what
help
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ahmad Khalifa
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-olebedev-when
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Oleg Lebedev
* URL : https://github.com/olebedev/when
On 11/01/2025 12:49, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Write on Google "Debian create new package" and first result: https://
wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian
It points to various parts but mainly the more probable start point
seems https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging/Intro
To point to git and gbp see
On 11/01/2025 20:43, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
There is no need to start new duplicate parallel efforts. Simply
contribute to the existing ones.
+1, please. Too many docs already :)
Anyone can edit the current wiki pages if they want to improve them
(although most people I spoke to don't like u
On 26/01/2025 11:19, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:07:12AM +, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
I do this to confirm if lintian is correct:
$ objdump -p file.so
...
NEEDED libc.so.6
...
No?
Lintian already says there is no "NEEDED libc
On 26/01/2025 04:57, Steven Robbins wrote:
I've come to realise the ITK build has 15 libraries that lintian flags with
...
The error description seems straightforward. But how does one solve
this? I have to assume that the linker would by default link with the
libc (?), so perhaps the linke
On 26/01/2025 12:41, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 6:28 AM Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
The lintian error is a great heads-up and it's up to the reader to
decide whether it's a true error to fix or a false-positive to override.
I have never seen this Lintian error actually be
On 27/01/2025 18:24, Russ Allbery wrote:
Marvin Renich writes:
* Russ Allbery [250126 12:47]:
In theory it would be possible to do better in Lintian by scanning the
symbol table to see if the libc dependency is really unneeded. But
doing that sounds at least a little annoying.
Annoying to
On 28/01/2025 22:28, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> recollection (it's been a *lot* of years so I'm hoping I'm
Russ> getting this right) is that this interfered with proper symbol
Russ> versioning and could cause the symbols to be resolved weirdly
R
On 27/01/2025 23:14, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ahmad Khalifa writes:
Having said that, lintian is slow enough as a single thread, I'd vote for
downgrading the tag to Pedantic, but not deleting it.
So, I guess I'll say this more explicitly: I am opposed to downgrading the
tag to pedant
On 29/01/2025 00:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ahmad Khalifa writes:
On 28/01/2025 22:28, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> recollection (it's been a *lot* of years so I'm hoping I'm
Russ> getting this right) is that this in
On 13/01/2025 21:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas (2025-01-13 22:06:01)
also, I'd think that nailing down the requirements for a new platform
and for the content to be migrated (e.g. drop any pages that are >X
years old) would be an important prerequisite for any t
15 matches
Mail list logo
