Re: aide 0.8-2 moved /etc/aide/aide.conf to /usr/local/etc/aide.conf

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello, > >I've just installed aide for woody but it was required to >move /etc/aide/aide.conf to /usr/local/etc/aide.conf. > >Can someone reproduce this if it's a bug or not ? > > > # apt-cache policy aide aide: Installed: 0.8-2 Candidate: 0.8-2 Version Table: **

AMD64 Archive Key compromised!

Matthew Garrett wrote: >Developers, do not allow > >http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3Asecring.gpg > >to happen to you. > > > Yeah. debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/wanna-build/secring.gpg is Forbidden, but ftp.be

Re: Apt-Torrent project

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > > >The Azureus Java client does this, so yes, it is possible. How bad this >interacts with the scatter-gatter logic of BT, I don't know. But the >.torrent files would be huge, and they would need to be upd

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

Will Newton wrote: >On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 09:27, David Weinehall wrote: > > >>>So far so sarcastic. IMO if it can be demonstrated that distributing >>>something is illegal we should think about not distributing it. >>> >>> >>And, as demonstrated elsewhere in the thread, whoops goes >>bib

Bug#293055: ITP: rails -- MCV ruby based framework geared for web application development

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: rails Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : David Heinemeier Hansson * URL : http://www.rubyonrails.com * License : MIT Description : MVC ruby based framework gear

Re: Bug#293055: ITP: rails -- MCV ruby based framework geared for web application development

David Nusinow wrote: >I worked on a package for this throughout the weekend, and while it's not done >I've made some considerable progress on it. If you'd like help or a >comaintainer, let me know. > > For the package, I essentially want to take rails and stuff it (minus the non-software stuff

Re: Orphaning three packages

Neil McGovern wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm orphaning three packages: >hawhaw-doc - the documentation for HAWHAW and HAWXY >hawxy - a script that makes PHP-enabled webservers to HAWHAW proxies >libphp-hawhaw - a PHP toolkit to create universal mobile applications > >RFAs have been filed for all of them.

Re: Add a videocard to Discover

Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Hello, > > During install my videocard is not detected by Debconf. It is a cheap > Nvidia compatible videocard what uses the "nv" driver. > > How can I tell the Discover-developpers about this videocard? > `reportbug discover` will do the trick. Just forward the report

Re: the ongoing xfree86 buildd saga

Wouter Verhelst wrote: >On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:41:46PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > >>What I'm saying is that once it's cleaned up, I have two options: >> >>* ask for my package to be requeued; >>* do another upload. >> >>And I'm almost certain that the latter option is faster, and

Re: Tips wanted for debugging and testing Debian

Sascha Berkenkamp wrote: >I use Debian unstable on my laptop, testing on my old PIII which runs >some server taks for my local net and a Debian stable on a Webserver. >I prefer to work on my old PIII, but I don't want to destroy my running >Debian. Should I install Debian on a second partition or

Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

Andreas Barth wrote: > Actually, I believe the Debian project as whole _wants_ to getting > >software released. That was at least the decision in all GRs where >people didn't hide the intents ("editorial changes"). > > Indeed. These types of changes are akin to changing a country's constitution

Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers

y-browser They have "Adam Majer is responsible for this Debian package" with a link to Debian's QA. This reference I find acceptable, but better wording would be "Adam Majer is responsible for the Debian version of this package". Then I also found, http://ubuntu.lin

Re: Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers

Matt Zimmerman wrote: >On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:34:09PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > >>Then I also found, >>http://ubuntu.linux-server.org/mysql-query-browser/mysql-query-browser_1.1.4-1ubuntu2.dsc >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ gpg --verify mysql-query

Re: Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers

Matthew Palmer wrote: >I understood the proposal to be only for unchanged Debian source packages >(ie pure rebuild). If an Ubuntuite is actively maintaining the package for >Ubuntu, it stands to reason that they be listed as the Maintainer for the >Ubuntu source package, with appropriate credit g

AMD64 non-free archive - the good and the bad

Hi, Ok. Took me about 6 hours, but I think I checked all licenses for non-free that were in debian/*copyright. I didn't look for other files - there is too much stuff in non-free and I don't want to go crazy. Anyway, I compiled the licenses and summary for what Amd64 could distribute in http://pe

Re: mrtg package problems

Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: >Hi, > >The mrtg and related packages seems to be orphaned. Shiju p. Nair is >last done an upload at 2004 April the 6th. Since then, there are only >NMUs, like it was NMUed constantly since 2002. The package is a bit >bad shape, would be good if someone look into them; th

Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?

Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:25:01AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: If Debian treated our upstreams this way, I'd be suprised if we ever got any patches accepted upstream. Debian does, in fact, treat most of its upstreams precisely this way. Debian publishes a large porti

Re: C++ ABI change -- freezing unstable for new C++ library packages

Matthias Klose wrote: > We will send an update with a detailed schedule, when the toolchain is > ready for the change. I'm sorry but I'm a little bit confused. Is unstable frozen *now*? If yes, is the toolchain being updated now? I'm assuming the change mostly involve moving gcc-defaults to poi

Re: C++ ABI change for etch -- freeze unstable for all C++ libs with changed or new sonames

Bill Allombert wrote: >On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > >>The time frame of the C++ ABI changed is not yet fixed. We will >>certainly need some time to get the toolchain in shape to start the >>transition. In the meantime you can check the new compilers in >>

Re: kernel security bug #307900

Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > woody's kernels are vulnerable to CAN-2004-1235, a uselib() race > condition. > > Will this be fixed for Woody? > I thought the plan was to provide security support for Woody for > another year? AFAIK, there is no security support for Woody kernels for some time now.

Re: C++ ABI change -- freezing unstable for new C++ library packages

Santiago Vila wrote: >On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Adam Majer wrote: > > > >>Also, the testing seems to be now unfrozen except for base. Does the >>base freeze have anything to do with the new C++ ABI? >> >> > >No, it's more a leftover of the freeze pr

Re: namespace conflict != package Conflict?

Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: >Hi folks, I have a noob question for you. I maintain the Cogito package >(my first), and it wants to install an executable as /usr/bin/git. The >GNU Interactive Tools package (git) also wants to install an executable >as /usr/bin/git. To avoid this conflict I made co

Re: kernel security bug #307900

Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Adam Majer wrote: > >> AFAIK, there is no security support for Woody kernels for some time now. >> Use kernel.org and compile your kernels for security sensitive machines. > > > What's the reason for this lack of support? > >

Re: TODO for etch ?

Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: >Since I can't find such a list, I'll try to write (a beginning of) one. > >- Complete transition to g++ 3.4/4.0 ABI >- Resolve FDL issue >- Get Xorg and KDE 3.4 into the archive. [as time passes, the version number >may change] >- (?) multiarch > > I'm not sure abou

Re: TODO for etch ?

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >>- >> >> > > - Improve hardware detection, make sure excluded kernel modules only > need to be listed one place. > > OK. Something to improve uppon. > - Replace default syslog-daemon to one capable to storing > severity/facility in the log file. > > People

Re: TODO for etch ?

Jesus Climent wrote: >On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:39:16PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > >>Hello. >> >>- >> >> > >- Early start of X, while some other stuff is still loading on the bg. > > That's a single package "problem" so not exactly an Etch todo candidate. But I think the rea

Re: TODO for etch ?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:27PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Adam Majer dijo [Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:15:00PM -0500]: > > > - Change boot system, to one capable of handling dependencies and > > > parallell invocation, to speed up the boot process. > > > > >

Re: SONAME and package version question

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it >for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511. >I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS. > >Without the patch, the relevant contents of the .deb a

Re: Work-needing packages report for Jun 24, 2005

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 12:26:30AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>The following packages have been orphaned: >> >> >> > >It seems to me that bugs #314682 and #314683 are broken. > > Ok, thanks. They are unbroken now. - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

Drew Parsons wrote: >I suppose we should decide now if etch is going to be 3.2 or 4.0. > >Given the ABI change with gcc-4.0 and the introduction of X.org, it >seems to me we have ample justification to introduce Debian 4.0. > > We had an ABI change with Sarge as well. Also, there is not that muc

Proper way of closing *old* bugs

care of the oh-so-many opened bugs that look almost all fixed upstream and/or obsolete to me. One of them is 5 years and 160 days old! "Release early, release often". " The rest of the email and his response follows, Cyril Bouthors wrote: > On 3 Apr 2006, Adam Majer wrot

Bug#291732: ITP: rake -- a simple ruby build program with capabilities similar to make

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: rake Version : 0.4.14 Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://rake.rubyforge.org/ * License : MIT Description : a simple ruby build

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:46:53PM -0400, Geordie Birch wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:32:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > For avoiding entering the US there are better reasons such as the following: > > http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1689.htm > > May 20, 2003. Fren

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 03:36:39PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Adam Majer wrote: > > > PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in > > Cuba than in US. Really. > > > > So let me get this straight. Instead of a country w

Re: Help wanted for packaging postgresql application

On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I want to package GnuMed which is a Python application accessing > > PostgreSQL server. > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/166282 > > > > It comes with a Python

Re: ATI Linux Driver Packages

On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:42:10PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > Are these drivers much better then than XFree ones or is there a reason > to be promoting nonfree drivers? I orginally packaged up the nvidia ones > in the way they are done due to the fact the XFree ones had no 3d > acceleration at al

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

Sebastian Kapfer wrote: I'd drop the sub-pentiums (i.e. 386 and 486) entirely. Not that my vote would count... I once read somewhere that you should _never_ compile in 486 optimizations for use in processors other than the 486. Apparently since 486 optimized code is padded a lot with NOPs. Appare

Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41:48PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:00:07PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Talk is cheap. If you can come up with a solution to the C++ problem that > > ignited this debate then i386 would be safe. >

Re: Bug#198602: ITP: debbackup -- Backup and restore Debian specifics (package status, conffiles)

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:15:42AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:59 am, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 11:44:51AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > > Tell me when you u

Re: Application files in $HOME

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:02:04PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I had a problem of exceeded quota in my home directory, so I > went cleaning it, and I saw many and many files and directories with > configurations for applications that I've runned in the past, but that > packages

Re: NM non-process

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:58:17AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > with. The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only > > > way to tackle with it seriously. That means taking time to

Re: NM non-process

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:40:21PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Adam Majer > > > > | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for > > | his/her package(s) within a week o

Re: About NM and Next Release

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:27:24PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 14:32, Steve Lamb wrote: > > Except when your sponsor goes AWOL for 3 weeks after giving them the URL > > to download the packages to paw through and upload. > > This is not different than someone in your pa

Re: NM non-process

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:18:00AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > IMHO, people should not package or take over a package that they > > do not understand how it works. For example, a kernel maintainer > [...] > >

Re: About NM and Next Release

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:39:52PM +0200, Oliver Bausinger wrote: > > > Someone should point NMs to difficulty of entering the development > > > mainstream of FreeBSD or becoming maintainer for the kernel... > > > IMO it's generally

Re: About NM and Next Release

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:41:45PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > > > > Not to toot my own horn, but I was accepted in under one week. I took 2

Re: About NM and Next Release

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > Anyway, waiting for DAM for some months now. I guess it has been > > 4-5 months n

Re: Bug#462027: ITP: libactiverecord-ruby -- library that ties database tables to classes in Ruby

Jon Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:35:06PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: >> Have you spoken with the rails package maintainer about this and your >> other ITP? Having duplicate copies of the same code lying around in >> the archive is something the security team has said they are activel

Re: DD in Antarctic Continent?

Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:17:04PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:13:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >>> So he's really in very-northern Finland/Sweden/Norway/Russia? >> If I recall correctly, he was somewhere in or around Michigan. >> > Wh

Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?

Colin Watson wrote: > Yes, I've been seeing the same thing. It's usually just an irritation, > but I guess some day I'll hit a threshold and get unsubscribed from a > bunch of lists. Wouldn't it be possible to configure the mail server to filter the mail based on the header content? That is, * I

Re: Split a package, rename an init file

Bertrand Marc wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to split a package foo into 2 new packages : foo and > foo-daemon. To do that I moved the daemon and the other obvious files > with dh_install -pfoo-dameon. I used dh_installinit to install the > init.d file to the foo-daemon package. > > Here are my que

Re: Split a package, rename an init file

Bertrand Marc wrote: > Thanks for your answers! > > So I guess the best way to do this is to split the package and use > dh_installinit --name=foo > > This way I can provide the buggy binary daemon in a seperate package > (recommended by foo), and keep the name of the conffiles. > > Do you think

Re: ssl security desaster

Russ Allbery wrote: > Martin Uecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In this case, the security advisory should clearly be updated. And all >> advise about searching for weak keys should be removed as well, because >> it leads to false sense of security. In fact, *all* keys used on Debian >> machi

Re: How to handle Debian patches

Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 16 mai 2008 à 16:04 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : >> You're insinuatiog that a VCS does not allow easily browsing and >> examining patches, and I just don't buy it. > > I can do more than insinuating: a VCS does not allow easily browsing and > examining patches.

Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository

Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > In my humble opinion they should be allowed to be packaged as if they > are normal packages. Don't get me wrong, but Debian is a distribution, > so what we basically do is pack up things that are worth distributing > and distribute them. This way Debian users can benefit

Re: Build logs from local builds

. I'm all in favour of removing uploaded binaries. But also allow source only uploads. -- Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Proposed mass prototypejs bug filing for multiple security issues

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 08:43:35PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: > Here are the affected source packages: > - rails (embed) ~$ apt-file list rails | grep prototype.js rails: /usr/share/rails/actionpack/test/fixtures/public/javascripts/prototype.js rails: /usr/share/rails/railties/html/j

Re: Build logs from local builds

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:12:15AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:29:47PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages. > > He, radical, but not new :) It has been discussed to death various >

Re: Build logs from local builds

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:39PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Adam Majer wrote: > > People are lazy and like myself don't want to sync pbuilder and > > related stuff every time I want to upload something. Since my box is > > rarely up to date, this can resu

Re: Build logs from local builds

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Adam Majer wrote: > > Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages. > > And thus allow people to upload without ever building locally. I would expect peop

Re: ReBuild-Depends?

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:33:12PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > This code works fine by libc wouldn't be rebuilt (new versions, or new > gcc - this moment is ambiguous to me). > Then this code begins segfaulting into this place. > If we try to rebuild our package, it will begin to work fine a

Re: Minimal kernel version raised to 2.6.27

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier > > than 2.6.27. > > What are these changes? Seems it is related to signalfd4 syscall. - Adam

Re: Iceweasel and Firefox compatibility

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > I just decided I don't care anymore. So here is a deal to those reading > this thread. Give me a UA string that: > - Doesn't claim to be Firefox (i.e keep Iceweasel in it) > - Is compatible with most crappy sites on earth[1] (i.e. Test

Re: The horde of sloppy maintainers is a myth. Maybe not. Maybe yes.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Charles Plessy (12/11/2009): > Look at e.g. the history of non-buildability for Alastair McKinstry's > packages. udunits[1,2] comes to mind. (Note I don't think I'm a > carebear, but that I'm not that used to YELLING in bugreports.

Re: Headsup: ncurses soname bump 5 to 6

Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:21:44PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: There is no hurry, but please start using soname-independent build-depends on ncurses as 'libncurses-dev | libncurses5-dev' in your next uploads. Does this mean it /can't/ be handled with binNMUs because you

Bug#509213: ITP: qtcreator -- IDE specifically designed for Qt

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer * Package name: qtcreator Version : 0.9.1-beta Upstream Author : Nokia * URL : http://trolltech.com/developer/qt-creator * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : IDE specifically designed

Bug#434583: ITP: tbb -- Thread Building Blocks is a parallelism library for C++

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: tbb Version : 2.0~20070719 Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * URL : http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/ * License : GPL with runtime exception Programming L

Bug#446316: ITP: ptop -- ptop is a utility that displays current state of PostgreSQL processes

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ptop Version : 3.6.1~b1 Upstream Author : Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ptop/ * License : BSD License Program

Bug#458386: Install scripts require dpkg (>= 1.10.24) for bzip2 compressed debs

Package: general Severity: normal While attempting to upload a new package with bzip2 compressed dpkg, I got a reject mail with, Rejected: rails_2.0.1-1_all.deb: uses bzip2 compression, but doesn't Pre-Depend on dpkg (>= 1.10.24) This pre-depend is only needed f

Re: Help needed: builds eating all memory

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:00:34PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: >My openvrml packages have been failing to build on arm [1], mips [2] > and mipsel [3] for some time. From the build logs, it looks like g++ is > eating all the memory and the OOM killer kills it. > >What can I do? Ask the buildd

Re: Packaging sysfsutils: static library?

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:05:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello everybody! > > Today I read about the upcoming architecture for kernel device files > [1]. devfs is already marked obsolete (what a pity, I really like > it...) and will be replaced by an userspace daemon udev. Me too, but I gue

Apache fails to build in woody...

Hi, I can't seem to be able to build apache from source in woody: --- configure: APACI and APXS --- cp build-tree/apache-contrib-1.0.8/mod_macro/mod_macro.c build-tree/apache_1.3.26/src/modules/extra cd build-tree/apache_1.3.26 && CFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O1" ./confi

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >* martin f krafft > >| What do you think? > >API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well. > >Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my >system. Per child. > > > After running for a little while, PID USER PR NI VI

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

martin f krafft wrote: >also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.06.1934 +0200]: > > >>After running for a little while, >> >> >[...] > > >>I wouldn't say it uses half a gig of ram. Something else is going >>on.. >&g

Re: Smooth Debian Installer Experience

Colin Watson wrote: >On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:27AM +0200, Tilo Schwarz wrote: > > >>Just one remark: When I was asked to enter a package server I would have >>liked to enter my local package repository (with all the base stuff in >>it), but either I couldn't or I didn't see it. But, never

Re: Bug#158683: ITP: oggasm -- MP3 to Ogg converter

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:55:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:31:23AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 10:16, Robert Millan wrote: > > > currently non-US is the only place where it can be without breaking law. > > > > This is incorrect: mp3 patents ex

Re: Bug#150411: Release-critical Bugreport for April 4, 2003

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, BugScan reporter wrote: > > > Package: xshipwars-server (debian/main) > > > Maintainer: Adam Majer <[EMAIL

Re: Bug#150411: Release-critical Bugreport for April 4, 2003

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:27:48PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > [ I host the xshipwars upstream mailing lists... ] > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 11,

Re: plagiarism of reiserfs by Debian

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:58:08AM -0600, Ed Boraas wrote: > Hello, all. > > Ideally, I think, including the verbatim message in a separate file > ("SPONSORS"?) and including a reference to that file in mkreiserfs' > output should serve as an acceptable balance. I'm willing to reconsider > that

Re: plagiarism of reiserfs by Debian

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:44:58AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > Repetitive, largely useless to the user messages like those should > > be removed and put in a file like SPONSORS or whatever. I would > > NOT

Re: libmysqlclient12 is GPL *not* LGPL

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:01:58PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, > I send this first here to doublecheck that I do not make a complete > ass out of myself ;-) > > You might not have noticed but libmysqlclient12 from MySQL 4 is > licensed GPL, i.e. you have got problems when linking agains

Re: Screwed up fonts in _ALL_ Qt applications :(

On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:33:12AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 09:00:02PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > Something related to #189750, perhaps? > > > > -- > > Looks like excitement by repetition! > > It is very unlikely that it is related to 189750, but it could be > som

Re: Do not touch l10n files (was Re: DDTP issue)

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:31:59AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Unfortunately 0xa0 is the no-break space which is very common in > French typography. One could argue that Tollef was not aware of this > fact, but the question is: why does he believe that he can change this > localized file when

Re: Warning: python-apt in testing broken, aptitude users DO NOT UPGRADE

On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote: > Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing > that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users) > are advised not to upgrade. > > Anyone know how exactly the testing scripts managed to miss th

Re: thomas's trivia crusade

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:16:15PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:17:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Sat, 22 Dec 2001 03:50:08 +0100: > > > they are actually *REAL* bugs that affect the operation of the > > > package, not trivial items li

Re: Sparc buildd a cross-compiler?

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed gsmlib has failed on sparc for a long time. The last log, > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gsmlib&ver=1.7-1&arch=sparc&stamp=10060

Re: Sparc buildd a cross-compiler?

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:07:41PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:54:10PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > > G++ 2.95 is pretty broken in its own right. Just because it won't compile > > something doesn't necessarily mean that the source is at fault. I wouldn't > > regard

Re: package lists for older machines

On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:57:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:15:58 +0100, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >A P166 should be a great mp3 player, but gnome probably is overkill... > >So you'll need another Packages.gz for mp3-players, another for servers > >(whic

Re: from potato to woody without a free internet connection

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Tom Jongsma wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running debian potato right now. I want to upgrade it to Debian Woody, > but I don't have a free internet connection. > Can I update my potato by burning a cd on school. And Install it on my > machine at home? > I can

Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:31:37AM +0100, Lenart Janos wrote: > [Please Cc: to me! (ETOOHIGHVOLUME)] > > As you might already have noticed Debian begun to bloat - so many > unneeded, unused, unmaintained(!) packages. > My opinion is that one DD alone couldn't upload NEW package, but he > needs 2 p

Re: Preparing a Proposal: 3 DD needed for every NEW package

On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 01:44:38PM +0200, Juha J?ykk? wrote: > > This doesn't sound too bad to me, _but_ a better report might be to > > set up some sort of automatic system that sends out email to all > > maintainers at 1 month intervals [or something like that]. If > > someone doesn't respond to

Question about cdrecord and -audio

cdrecord or my drive? Thanks for any help in advance, Adam Majer pgpbU7PIFqIVI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: find eating all memory

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:45:53PM -0600, Bryan Andersen wrote: > Andreas Rottmann wrote: > > > > Michael De Nil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > on a simple 'find /var -name sendmail* -print' command, the find-process > > > eats all my memory (128 Meg RAM) > > > when there is

Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:22:09AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 02:23, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > smooth introduction? you never heard of policy, maint-guide, developers' > > reference, web pages, etc, have you? > > Many operating systems have accompanying "certific

CHECK BEFORE YOU RETITLE Re: Processed: Retitling...

Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST __BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG! - Adam On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:03:14PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > retitle 123477

Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:43:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Adam Majer > | clear.. For even a novice admin that is... After all, isn't admins > | or admin-wanna-bees what are installing a new system anyway? IMHO, I > | don't think that there is anything too c

Re: CHECK BEFORE YOU RETITLE Re: Processed: Retitling...

thout explanation is seen as an attemp to adopt a package.. Thanks, Adam Majer

Re: maintainer for cervisia is MIA

Try sending email to QA or something. Maybe they should orphan the package owned by that maintainer. - Adam On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:34:53AM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and > haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of t

Re: packaging spambouncer - cronjob updates in /usr???

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:31:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates > on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then > the files can't remain in /usr, right? > > the primary candidate for installation o

Re: [wish] buildd.debian.org that shows success/failure

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:33:09AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > An useful improvement in buildd.debian.org is show in a different color > or with some graphic flag the builds that results in a failure. Different color.. something like keep it black for successful build but mark it bold and

  1   2   >