On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:27:05PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I confirm that usually not having the i386 or amd64 log is often a > problem. > > One idea that was floating around was to have buildd always recompile > the package, even on archs the uploader has provided a binary version > for, to make sure packages are clean. That would somehow answer you > need (i.e. provide a build log for _all_ archs).
Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages. People are lazy and like myself don't want to sync pbuilder and related stuff every time I want to upload something. Since my box is rarely up to date, this can result in dependencies lagging somewhat compared to official buildd. I generally don't check for any build-depends problems anyway with pbuilder unless buildd chokes. And for the Arch:all packages? I guess no check for this with lazy maintainer. So how do I compare with the other maintainers? Or do all maintainers run pbuilder religiously for each upload? The requirement not allowing source only uploads is childish at best - it treats DD as children that can't check their packages compile on their own box. I'm all in favour of removing uploaded binaries. But also allow source only uploads. -- Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
