Ken Bloom wrote:
> I noticed that glabels is broken on i386 because it's not binary NMU
> safe, and someone did a binary NMU.
>
> After poking around a bit, I found
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2005/11/msg0.html, which
> discussed a possible solution to this problem. Since then, we ha
Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to this list.]
>
>As some have already noticed, openswan has been removed from testing a while
>ago, most probably because of bug #291274, which did not apply to package
>version 2.2.0-4 (the one that has
David Moreno Garza wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:31 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
>>Scripsit David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Revolution is a little Ruby binding to the excellent Evolution email
>>>client.
>>>
>>>
>>Is it so little that it would be better to in
Christian Storch wrote:
>Strange: Could there be any correlation with my observed problems
>about resolving anything of debian.org during exactly that time?
>(http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp/2005/04/msg00023.html)
>
>
Name Server:SAENS.DEBIAN.ORG
Name Server:KLECKER.DEBIAN.ORG
Name Server:SP
Blars Blarson wrote:
>>Name Server:SAENS.DEBIAN.ORG
>>Name Server:KLECKER.DEBIAN.ORG
>>Name Server:SPOHR.DEBIAN.ORG
>>
>>
>
>spohr changed IP addresses last week, and the glue record returned by
>the .org nameservers still had the old address when I checked a few
>hours ago. This has been rep
Shaun Jackman wrote:
>This doesn't work for me:
>
>$ cat debian/watch
>version=2
>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/n/ne/neutrino/neutrino-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>debian uupdate
>$ uscan
>neutrino: Newer version (0.8.2) available on remote site
> (local version is 0.7.3)
>neutrino: Successfully downloade
Nico Golde wrote:
>Hi,
>if we would drop some archs now, what is the best way of
>making new packages. Should we just fill in the archs which
>are supported in the future too to hold the load on the
>archs buildds which will be dropped low?
>
>
No. Just leave it as any unless there is a good re
Patrick A. Ouellette wrote:
>The progression I see is:
>
>unstable -> testing -> candidate -> stable
>
>
Unfortunately this totally changes the purpose of "stable". Stable is
there not to provide bug free, up-to-date software releases. Stable is
to provide environmental stability. When someone
On 4/16/05, Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:48 -0500, Adam M. wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately this totally changes the purpose of "stable". Stable is
>
> Yes and no. It changes the concept of stable in that stable evolves.
&
> Isn't the process:
>
> 1) make a patch
> 2) give it to the apache developers
> 3) new packaged apache versions have the patch
> 4) patch makes it upstream
> 5) patch no longer needed in debian package
You know, there are security updates for stable releases. You have to
patch those. If there ar
On 4/20/05, Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam M wrote:
>
> >>? I guess I don't understand enough about how the build process works
> >>for the packages in debian but that sounds funny to me. Or I just don't
> >>understand what you mean
Steve Langasek wrote:
>Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
>libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
>
I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
has changed the way passwords are stored in the database and this
prevents clients f
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
>
>
>>The according bug is #306608.
>>
>>
>
>This is a bug, though possibly not in the libwxgtk2.4-python package. If
>the relevant maintainers (libwxgtk2.4-python, wxpython2.5.3) and bug
>sumitters can't work out a solution, then ask the Tech
martin f krafft wrote:
>Apple has just released launchd, a init/cron/watchdog/etc.
>replacement. Has anyone looked at it? It seems like a bit of work to
>
>
It is not a good idea to replace multiple system utilities with one.
Right now I can install a different cron or inetd or atd, or I can
rem
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>grave <-> serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
>difference between them (both are RC)
>
>
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer and the rest of the Debian world about
the seriousness of
François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>
>>#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
>>Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
>>
>>#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
>>langband e
On 5/4/05, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > >grave <-> serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
> > >difference between them (both
Holger Levsen wrote:
>btw, google has no (good) hits for "sarge releasenotes", but for "sarge
>release notes" they have... maybe this helps.
>
>
Try "sarge release notes"
- Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Kevin Mark wrote:
>Hi DD folks,
>Sarge is now approaching zero kelvin and folks are scrambing to get the
>last few bugs squashed. I was recently thinking about why the non-clued
>folks bash Debian with incomplete or inaccurate facts and a way to
>address that. I think there should be a section on
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>>On Friday 06 May 2005 11:22am, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>> Note: non-free is NOT provided yet. We need to decide what we do with
>>> it, as we may be forbidden to distribute some of the software in it (we
>>>aren't Debian).
>>>
>Not necessary. For 'sattrack
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>"Adam M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>We are not part of Debian. We are not allowed to use certain Debian
>resources such as buildd.d.o for buildd logs, access to the incoming
>queue for buildds or wanna-build and several other things.
>
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:23 -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>
>>Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
>>
>>
> Yup.
>
>
>
>>I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
>>package, it probably should be orphaned.
>>
>>
> OK, please check
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>Adam Majer dijo [Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:23:10PM -0500]:
>
>
>>Currently there are two packages that he maintains,
>>
>>http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>*libnet**-easytcp-perl
>>**mrtg
>>
>>I would like to maintain mrtg since I do use it. As to the other
>>package, i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adam M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dhcpv6
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : ?? Not a single one - many...
* URL : http://dhcpv6.sourceforge.net/
* License : Mostly BSD, some LGPL and MIT/X
Des
Vadim Petrunin wrote:
> Sorry, but looks like there is no rc bugs in the "baghira" package.
> There was only one bug "Serious policy violations" but it is resolved
> now.
> Why it is out of release?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/baghira.html
Ask the maintainer. It was not in Sarge because of t
On 5/12/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Adam M.]
> > Description : a stateful address autoconfiguration protocol for IPv6
> > DHCPv6 is a stateful address autoconfiguration protocol for IPv6, a
> > counterpart to IPv6 stateless addr
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> I moved the server because wedohosting.com's bandwidth fees were
> getting prohibitive (i'm with iweb.ca now).. otherwise I would have been
> happy to have it continue running for another few thousand days. :-)
I find that Tera-Byte.com in Edmonton has nice colo rate
27 matches
Mail list logo
