On Tue, 31 May 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Moore's Law governs the rate at which the speed of hardware (at a given
> price-point) doubles. It says nothing about the speed at which current
> software will *run* on current machines; and it certainly has nothing to say
> about the speed at which s
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hey,
>
> as you've probably heard, Google has a "summer of code" initiative to
> stimulate open source coding. They are looking for mentors to support the
> coders. Shouldn't Debian be on that list?
>
> Matthijs
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/su
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> > 3 Future
> >
> > * fix the Debian Java Policy;
> > * update the Debian Java FAQ;
> > * more packages to pkg-java;
> > * every packages to cdbs;
>
>
> Why cdbs?
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > >
> > > 3 Future
> > >
> > > * fix the Debian Java Policy;
> > > * upd
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2005 à 18:41 -0500, Adam Heath a écrit :
> > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
> > > interact
> > > once installed. But stay the hell away from how they ar
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:13 -0500 (CDT),
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >>
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > >
> > > > That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
> > > > issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many
> > > > charac
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I don't understand what would be wrong with having a symlink in /bin ...
>
> Because this applies to most of the programs in /sbin. It would be easier
> to just merge both directorie
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
> It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
> conflict with git or with cgvg.
>
> I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/README.Debian, and I
>
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 16:25 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> >why is there a link to logs in /etc?
> >
> >/etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
> > /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
> >
> >/etc is supposed to be for configuration fi
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a stupid argument.
>
> It's not that stupid.
But it is.
> If other files shouldn't be there, the specs should explicitly state that.
Use just a
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A little later than the rest of the architectures, we are now ready to
> announce the availability of CDs (businesscard, netinst and full) and
> DVDs for AMD64.
>
> As AMD64 is unofficial, the URL for downloading the images is slightly
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Erik Steffl [2005-06-12 16:25 -0700]:
> > why is there a link to logs in /etc?
> >
> > /etc/postgresql/7.4/main/log is a link to
> > /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
>
> The basic idea of the new cluster system was to have the comple
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > I just wanted to confirm my recollection that now that stable has been
> > released
> > with support for ~ in package versions in dpkg and apt, we can now use ~ in
> > package vers
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Well and then what is pending for it?
>
> - DAK support for it;
> - APT support?
apt already supports it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I think this can not quite do it, since the chroot will need to be a
> > > woody chroot but get at least partially upgraded in each test to allow
> > > installation of the sarge and sid packages. It looks like piuparts is
> > > otherwise clo
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, sean finney wrote:
> hey,
>
> about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
> to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
> yet made it into unstable:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
>
> anyone know more about this
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, David Pashley wrote:
> On Jul 09, 2005 at 12:12, Nico Golde praised the llamas by saying:
> > Hallo Matthew,
> > >
> > > Coreutils is required. Why is the ability to do something without it an
> > > advantage?
> >
> > You can do almost every thing with with tools like, grep,
>
Master and murphy are changing colos. This entails a shutdown, de-rack, move
across town(not far, tho), and power back up. Est. time is 2 hours.
Nat rules will be installed, so that access can continue at the old addresses.
DNS will be updated after the move.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> what is the status of the xen package ?
>
> Where can I help you out if you need help on Xen 2.0 (bug #280773) ?
I'm the maintainer, not Raphael.
I've got xen 2.0.1(need to upgrade to .3), but can't upload, until
kernel-source-2.4.28 en
h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 716280FA GPG
-END PGP INFO-
local to master).
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67
P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
t extract into - directly.
So, I decided to do something about that finally. Below is an example dsc
format that I have come up with.
===
Source: xawtv
Format: 2.0
Version: 3.07-2
Binary: xawtv, fbtv, radio, streamer, webcam, xawtv-tools
Maintainer: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: a
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
> >
> > > Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and cataloging program
> > > Gnome is the &qu
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
> > different files specified for the files field. The existance of a Format
>
> Having
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Adam Heath wrote:
> > However, it has its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the
> > source in subtrees, all packed up, and that it doesn't extract into
> > - directly.
>
> You conveniently ignore
as
broken. Sorry everyone. :(
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyI
+ P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
On 21 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> How would you create these diffs?
Please reread the mails. I said it only extracts. I've said nothing about
building anything yet.
> Also, have you
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 07:56:04PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > netscape4.08 (slink) (parts exist in woody, but not in potato)
> > netscape4.72
> > netscape4.73
> > netscape4.base
>
> I intend to adopt all of the nets
- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
K CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
inary, I just moved the
code into the internal library it uses.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL
K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8B
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> severity 80842 serious
> severity 80843 serious
> thanks
>
> gcc won't build on arm, so XFree86 won't build on arm, so XFree86 can't go
> into testing, so LOTS of things can't go into testing.
>
>
z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:02:53PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Adam Heath, please consider helping the gcc maintainer do some DBS
> > > surgery,
> > > because it is DBS that is keeping gcc from building.
> >
&
DBS cannot.
I wasn't putting it down. Each system has evolved to perform what the users
have desired of it.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
LOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1
!O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489
ssion denied
Touch the file first, then chown it, before calling s-s-d.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[
f it is running
sh is the executable, not /usr/sbin/debian-mirror.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL
D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
EEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63
a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C
2.97-001230_i386.changes
> NEW to experimental
Unless you actually see an INSTALL, it hasn't been installed.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE
nt to see an upgrade of
this package kill a working configuration.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL
s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46
e current maintainer of lilo.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print
an you
give any more details, so that I can try to track it down?
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMA
EK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
ps: I did the above during the bo<->ham
BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Marek Habersack wrote:
> ** On Jan 08, Adam Heath scribbled:
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it took me about a year's wait also.
> >
> > I created my pgp key on Dec. 27, 1997. 2 weeks later, I was a
>
-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian
> dpkg-dev - Package building tools for Debian
> dpkg-doc - Dpkg Internals Documentation
> Changes:
> dpkg (1.8.1.2) unstable;
* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
ripts,
including adduser) NEEDS TO NOT BREAK PERIOD.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
out this?
I did, I only bcc'd it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that replies wouldn't spam the
bts.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
---END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
S--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-
P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
----BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6
/mail/.forward-mailerrors
/dev/null
It's just a matter of having the new system be in the correct .forward files.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK C
The old way, we had one kernel, optimized for the lowest denonimation of ia32
machine. Ie, i386. We then modified the drivers that were compiled into the
kernel.
Now, using an initrd, we no longer need to compile different variations of
drivers and modules into and out of the kernel. We can co
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The script can't even get everything a Debian Developer does for Debian.
> While most, if not all, active Debian Developers do packaging work,
> there's other stuff to be done -- such as taking care of autobuilders,
> being a sysadmin, ftp-master, list
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> "Oh no, the Collins family has 2 acres per child...those poor kids! Uh,
> you say that 3.5 acres of your yard is a lake?"
Dredging. With a snorkel.
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Masato Taruishi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debdivert
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> License : GPL
> Description : Debian packaging aid to create patch packages
>
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:48:02PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > > The script can't even get everything a Debian Developer does for Debian.
> > > While most, i
On 31 May 2003, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> [snip]
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I needed that. Thanks for the laugh. Made my day.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jarno Elonen wrote:
Already being planned for dpkg 2.0. Note, this has to be tied in with the
status of the package being hooked, as the status changes state, so it really
needs to be done in dpkg.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:36:49AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> > i am very sure, I did never have touched this file, so why is dpkg always
> > asking me if i want to overwrite it? IS this a dpkg problem, is it a
> > packaging problem, or is is a s
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:26:08PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>
> > >1918space and are masqueraded to the outside internet by a firewall/gateway
> > >running Debian on a 486 or low end pentium. I believe this to be a fairly
> > >significant pro
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Kevin Edwards wrote:
> I was wondering if you would send me the sheet music for dueling banjoes -
> I want to transpose it for other instruments -
Sorry, can't help you there. I can give you the byte codes for dueling
flamewars, however.
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed a few transitional and dummy packages on my system, but there was
> no common way to identify them. I think the following packages exist:
>
> a) dummy packages which depend on the new name of a package for
>1 - automatic update
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Neil Spring wrote:
> > However I've found a number of packages which use a long
> > description which is more or less the _same_ as the short
> > description.
>
> This is just a thought, but perhaps the control file could
> incorporate a mechanism for common description of pac
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Nobody has even explained WHY we have this issue. The summary posted on the
> > bug report just said that there is a problem with atomicity.h, not what the
> > problem is or why it exists.
>
> Just look at the file for your
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Fellas, looking in the Packages files, some big packages have little
> descriptions, some little packages have big descriptions, but on the average,
> 11938 packages
> avg size 510963
> avg description 7.70431 lines
> avg. bytes per description lines 6632
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: debbackup
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dsto
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I have also been thinking about creating a complimentary program that
> would help "cleanup" the system by finding unused packages, seldom used
> packages, cruft, unnessisary files... As with debbackup, there are things
> to do some of the functons
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hmm...
>
> Seems that apt-get ignores -o DPkg::Options.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /tmp/xxx
> #!/bin/sh
> echo dpkg $*
> exit 1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LANG=C apt-get -o 'Dir::Bin::dpkg=/tmp/xxx' -o
> 'DPkg::Options={"--xxx";}' install nvi
> R
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Michael Banck wrote:
> Also, please note that at least half of the dpkg-maintainers don't read
> -devel, you probably want to post this to -dpkg. Incidently, there is a
> proposal and patch by Gerhard Tonn for handling lib64 under
> discussion[2].
Well, considering there are
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > The patch has been already written: http://lwn.net/Articles/8634/ I'm
> > sure theere's a better link, but that's the best I could extract out of
> > google without resorting to bribery :-)
>
> This patch is insuff
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> I dunno, but I am working on expanding uqm-content's 6 lines to
> something more appropriate to its number of files (11.5 thousand). Maybe
> .. 600 lines?
>
> Now I'm really glad uqm-voice (100+ mb) is not going into the archive
> anytime soon. I have more i
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Mark Hedges wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-28
> Followup-For: Bug #198479
>
> There needs to be a backwards-compatible perlapi-5.6.1 module
> which apt-file and other depend on to install. Since rolling
> out perl 5.8.0, many packages that
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
> * License
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> I don't know why my previous message on this topic didn't get
> through, so let me try again...
murphy has been having load issues, amoung other things.
> I'm planning to file bugs against source packages which currently
> don't build in unstable bec
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:15:37PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:39:36PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > [Please cc me; I'm very behind on -devel]
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm very confused by this bug and am su
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Mark Hedges wrote:
>
> I apologize for filing multiple bug reports about this
> before seeking consensus on the list.
>
> Is someone going to put perlapi-5.6.1 back into sarge?
> Lots of packages indirectly depend on this and cannot
> be installed now. Should there be a dummy
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> I`ll proceed in the time order of events:
>
> Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:52:38 +0400:
> I`ve produced a testcase for make which causes it to bail out
> with a
> *** Virtual memory exhausted. Stop
> message on a perfectly valid, sane
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
> * License
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Millis Miller wrote:
> What other package would you suggest that does the same functionality then
> insteard? I specifically was interested in this one because of the mime
> encoding of the signature/encryption functionality.
apt-cache show bash
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Extension of the java.lang package
And?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Ease and speed development and maintenance of validation
> rules
And?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Julien LEMOINE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that
> complained
> about the fact that I didn't warning about the new /etc/default/stunnel file
> introduced in package (thereis a note in README.Debian and in changelog).
>
>
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:57:43PM -0400, Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
> |
> | For the curious, the upgrade route failed as well, but on libpam0g not
> | console-tools-libs. Any work around would be appreciated.
> |
>
> dpkg -i libpam0g*.deb and its depend
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> software
>n : (computer science) written programs or procedures or
>rules and associated documentation pertaining to the
>operation of a computer system and that are stored in
>read/w
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> if [ "$1" = configure ] && grep -q evil /etc/myconfig; then
> dpkg-log --priority=critical \
>--warning=$"/etc/myconfig has evil in it! See README.Debian!"
> elsif [ "$phase_of_moon" = full ]; then
> dpkg-log --priority
On 6 Jul 2003, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Doogie is thinking about extending the Bittorrent protocol for use as
> apt-get method. I talked with him on irc about some design ideas and
> so far it looks realy good if he can get some mirrors to host it.
My plans are to require no additional software
101 - 200 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
