On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:13 -0500 (CDT), > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> > > >> > 3 Future > >> > > >> > * fix the Debian Java Policy; > >> > * update the Debian Java FAQ; > >> > * more packages to pkg-java; > >> > * every packages to cdbs; > >> <SNIP> > >> > >> Why cdbs? I was under the impression that many people disliked/wer > >> uncomfortable with it because of the complex way in which it employs > >> makefiles. Wouldn't your packages be more accessible (in terms of > >> other developers being able to patch/fix bugs/etc.) in a more > >> universal format? > > > > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should > > interact once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are > > built. > > I *never* said I wanted to put this in the Java Policy!
Then why list it as the future? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
