Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dylan Aïssi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libpisp
* URL: https://github.com/raspberrypi/libpisp
* License: BSD-2-clause
This library provides helper functions to generate hardware
confi
> sorry but I am confused... can you explain at a beginner level what
> is the difference between a certificate and a "key" in the sense it
> is used in the Developers Reference?
A certificate is a key with a name attached to it. So in the case of
Debian developer's PGP keys, it means the same thin
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:06:35PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
xgettext comes with a ton of options to help you. Have a look at the
diff I've attached for what I've been able to do.
Will do and take your suggestions. But it is still a wrapper needed.
I have put this into the adduser wrapper and
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 11:56 AM Santiago Vila wrote:
> This is an update for my previous MBF announcement here:
Thank you for this wonderful project and for raising the severity to
serious since it's clearly easier to fix the bugs in Unstable now
rather than as Stable Updates later.
I think your
[ Adding Guido in copy, replying to an old mail ]
Hello Gregor,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 12:00:27 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Given that the "upstream" branch name cames from the git-buildpackage and
> > that it's git-buildpackage which introduced
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 01:14:57PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So «certificate» should be taken as a synonym with what was previously
> known as «Transferable Public Key» (or «public key»), in contrast to
> a «key» which is understood as a «Transferable Secret Key» (or
> «secret key»). Which shou
Hi!
On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 10:55:16 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> sorry but I am confused... can you explain at a beginner level what is the
> difference between a certificate and a "key" in the sense it is used in the
> Developers Reference?
Ah, sorry, the OpenPGP working group and as part of th
Hi,
sorry for replying to an old thread.
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Maybe before moving it to ACCEPTED, it would be useful to design a
> dashboard of some kind to track adoption, not just in tooling, but in
> actual packages?
I agree with that. Furthermore with multiple recent
El 20/3/25 a las 15:29, Jeremy Bícha escribió:
Thank you for this wonderful project and for raising the severity to
serious since it's clearly easier to fix the bugs in Unstable now
rather than as Stable Updates later.
Thanks go to the Release Managers, more specifically Paul Gevers,
who allowe
Hi Robert,
Am Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 04:34:09PM -0400 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
> Question: Should uncoordinated NMUs unilaterally choose Salsa as the VCS
> for a package?
I agree that *uncoordinated* NMUs should not simply choose Salsa as VCS.
> * Does your NMU really fix bugs? ("Bugs" means a
10 matches
Mail list logo
