Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-06 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:53:07 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: I think that even for emails, the line length should be kept at a reasonable value in order to maximize the readability. Such value is usually lower than 80, as shown, for example, in https://baymard.com/blog/line-length-readability . I d

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Helmut K. C. Tessarek
On 2025-03-06 17:56, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: It was a Debian Buster on armv7l that I had forgotten, because it was running perfectly until now, but apps complained that the OS is no longer supported. To clarify my previous statement: The upgrade to bullseye changed the ifname. Buster used

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 23:01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: This doesn't give a huge list of packages using diversions, but very high profile packages are in there. Keep in mind that many of those are there to support usrmerge; these probably should be filtered out. On the other hand, on my system lots of

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-06 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting gregor herrmann (2025-03-07 00:14:19) > On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:53:07 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > >I think that even for emails, the line length should be kept at a reasonable > >value in order to maximize the readability. Such value is usually lower than > >80, as shown, for example,

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 7/3/25 12:29 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: Hi! Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality of the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview For packages that I sponsor, I already do reviews of the debian/copyright and all other files

STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:58:48AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Marc. I'll take my Popcorn with salt please. yeah, it's pretty funny to see a team burn out and have the same silly & salty discussion about this again and again. or maybe not. also talking about how NEW is a bottleneck will be reall

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:39:43PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: > Both network "outages" could have been prevented by adding a note at the end > of the dist-upgrade output. they could also have been prevented by reading the release notes and following their advice. that would also have pre

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-06 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:32:05PM -0800, James Lu wrote: If I were to write, say, a Thunderbird extension that forcibly unwraps text I receive, regardless of whether format=flowed was specified, what would be the implication? This (as a mild but easy to get example of pre-formatted text): Fo

Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 09:53, Marc Haber wrote: I apologize for trying to bring a smile into a heated discussion Thank you. -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bits from DPL

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 08:58, Marc Haber wrote: I thank the DPL for putting this to public attention. Well OK but mayybe he should have handled this a bit more diplomatically. Or maybe he tried to, and failed to get traction. I assume he'll tell us presently, if only to reduce the popcorn-to-serious-dis

Re: TC decision on ownership of top-level filesystem aliases - #1091995

2025-03-06 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello ctte, On Tue 04 Mar 2025 at 11:46am GMT, Matthew Vernon wrote: > In Bug #1091995, the Technical Committe was asked to rule on an issue > that could, under certain circumstances, result in failure of the > base-files package to install or upgrade correctly. Under these > circumstances, syste

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 06 Mar 2025 at 01:21pm +09, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi Sean and everybody, > > Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality > of > the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview > > Maybe we could revisit the idea along these

Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi, * Matthias Urlichs [2025-03-05 23:00]: The NEW queue currently contains ~135 packages. The median wait time on the list(*) is three weeks, and the oldest packages have been, well, languishing, for nine months or so. (*) Yes I know that this may well be an inflated median: after all, the

Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 06 Mar 2025 at 08:41am +01, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Apparently the problem isn't that no help is needed but that nobody has time > to train the new help, citing possible burn-out trying to get answers from the > existing members and leaving in disappointment, if not disgust. (My >

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Hi, Le 2025-03-06 10:41, Sean Whitton a écrit : If someone wants to set this up in a way that doesn't increase ftp team workload but means packages have to be reject'd less often -- by all means. Do you have some stats or even just an estimate telling how often this happens, or is there an a

Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 3/6/25 2:09 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: so if the/a team says they cannot handle new members right now and thus there should be no big announcement asking for new members, I very much think this should be respected and not be ignored and spread on our most visible mailing list, where there pain

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 06/03/2025 09:43, Holger Levsen ha scritto: On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:39:43PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: Both network "outages" could have been prevented by adding a note at the end of the dist-upgrade output. they could also have been prevented by reading the release notes and fol

Bug#1099652: ITP: bacon -- background code checker

2025-03-06 Thread Blair Noctis
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Blair Noctis X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, n...@debian.org * Package name: bacon Version : 3.11.0 Upstream Contact: dystroy * URL : https://dystroy.org/bacon/ * License : AGPL-3.0 Programming Lang: Rust

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread NoisyCoil
On 06/03/25 14:25, Lorenzo wrote: Hello Otto, [please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed] Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the distribution wit

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Josefsson
Charles Plessy writes: > Hi Sean and everybody, > > Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality > of > the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview > > Maybe we could revisit the idea along these lines: I like this idea, as an opt-in s

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Lee Garrett
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:39:43 -0500, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" wrote: Both network "outages" could have been prevented by adding a note at the end of the dist-upgrade output. e.g. something like the following (monospace font required for the "Attention" text): _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Wookey
On 2025-03-06 08:43 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:39:43PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote: > > Both network "outages" could have been prevented by adding a note at the end > > of the dist-upgrade output. > > they could also have been prevented by reading the release n

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Lorenzo
Hello Otto, [please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed] > Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that > complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce > don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the > distribution without having proper Breaks/Rep

Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 10:51, Sean Whitton wrote: You can't just throw people at a team of volunteers who are busy doing other things and say "train them". That's true in general. However. * this episode demonstrates that there are obviously a few crossed wires between ftpmaster and DPL; I think it's fa

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-06 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-03-06 at 00:32, James Lu wrote: > Hi all, > > On 2025-02-26 10:21, Soren Stoutner wrote: >> However, from a technical perspective, having the *sending* program >> decide where line breaks should be in an email doesn’t seem like >> the correct approach to me because, 1) the sending progr

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-06 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hello James, Il giorno mer, 05/03/2025 alle 21.32 -0800, James Lu ha scritto: > Hi all, > On 2025-02-26 10:21, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > > > I started thinking about this a few weeks ago when I received an email > > from a Debian Developer complaining that replies from my email client > > (KMai

Re: Bits from DPL

2025-03-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: On Wed 05 Mar 2025 at 11:35pm +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: Do you mind clarifying why that's the case, unless the reason is truly personal or undisclosable? It's pretty simple -- there is no-one with the free time to train them right

Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:39:13AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:58:48AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: Marc. I'll take my Popcorn with salt please. yeah, it's pretty funny to see a team burn out and have the same silly & salty discussion about this again and again. I apol

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Otto Kekäläinen [250306 19:57]: > Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that > complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce > don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the > distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the > `debi

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Helmut K. C. Tessarek
On 2025-03-06 09:13, Wookey wrote: Would it? Do we know why these things happened? K.C. does not say what he was upgrading from/to (so it wasn't a very useful report in that regard), but there has certainly been a long-term expectation that headless upgrades will work (and in my experience of 25

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Helmut K. C. Tessarek
On 2025-03-05 07:38, Helmut Grohne wrote: I am surprised to see this happen. Back in older times, interfaces used to be named like eth0, but that should not be happening since quite a number of stable releases. Those old systems that still use eth0 today tend to do it due to a file /etc/udev/rule

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > > Salsa CI has had for many years the job 'missing-breaks' that > > complements piuparts by checking that the files a package introduce > > don't clash with files shipped by any other package in the > > distribution without having proper Breaks/Replaces in the > > `debian/control` file. This

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality > of > the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview For packages that I sponsor, I already do reviews of the debian/copyright and all other files. These are recorded as Merge Requests in

Re: Growing new FTP-masters (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi, > > Apparently the problem isn't that no help is needed but that nobody has time > > to train the new help, citing possible burn-out trying to get answers from > > the > > existing members and leaving in disappointment, if not disgust. (My > > interpretation …) > > > > While that's a valid co

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 03:52:54PM +0100, NoisyCoil wrote: > Another instance of diversions not being detected is in linux's pipeline > [1,2]: linux-libc-dev and oss4-dev both install > /usr/include/linux/soundcard.h, oss4-dev diverts it, missing-break fails. If > my understanding is correct, this

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Hakan Bayındır
On 3/6/25 4:00 PM, Lee Garrett wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:39:43 -0500, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" wrote: Both network "outages" could have been prevented by adding a note at the end of the dist-upgrade output. e.g. something like the following (monospace font required for the "Attention" te

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Bjørn Mork
Wookey writes: > Which entry in which release notes will warn that this time > (presumably - was this an upgrade to unstable K.C. or to bookworm, or > something else?) the (pretty old now) eth0 -> 'annoying, unmemorable, > but ordered and unique', renaming will/might actually break your > config?

Re: Improvement of headless server upgrades

2025-03-06 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 02:13:49PM +, Wookey wrote: Which entry in which release notes will warn that this time (presumably - was this an upgrade to unstable K.C. or to bookworm, or something else?) the (pretty old now) eth0 -> 'annoying, unmemorable, but ordered and unique', renaming will/mi

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread NoisyCoil
On 06/03/25 17:09, Bastian Blank wrote: Open an serious bug report against oss4-dev. No need to wait, it needs to go. oss4-dev is fine (unless diversions of files in linux-libc-dev are forbidden): oss4-dev is correctly diverting the header, as a consequence it needs not Break or Conflict wit

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 17:51, Bastian Blank wrote: Because diverts are kind of sledgehammers. Without coordination they break stuff. OK, so in *this* case the diversion is in error (in your opinion anyway; not having looked at the contents of these headers, I have no opinion here). However, I'm reason

Re: Salsa CI job 'missing-breaks' to be enabled by default starting March 1st

2025-03-06 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 06.03.25 19:42, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 06:21:10PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: However, I'm reasonably certain that there are other cases where diversions are intentional and perfectly valid. Do you have an example? Does perldoc diverting the stub perldoc so that it