Re: FQDN mandatory or can a machine could not have a domain ?

On Nov 08, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Does it seems a reasonable assumption to use a domain for an host even if it > is localdomain or test ? > > Do you think it is a good idea to set the testbed hostname to a FQDN ? Please do. This has been a pain for the INN CI as well. -- ciao, Marco sig

pcre2 10.44-1 uploaded to experimental

Hi, I've just uploaded version 10.44-1 of pcre2 to experimental. This is mostly a tidy-up of the previous 10.43 release. I'll do an upload to unstable in due course, assuming no show-stoppers are found :) Regards, Matthew

FQDN mandatory or can a machine could not have a domain ?

Hi, I am trying to improve a few CI of your package and I found some package (for instance mail associated package) could not be tested if the machine is not a FQDN Does it seems a reasonable assumption to use a domain for an host even if it is localdomain or test ? Do you think it is a good

Bug#1087133: ITP: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3 -- A high-level OpenPGP library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3 Version : 3.0.0-1 Upstream Author : ProtonMail * URL : https://github.com/ProtonMail/gopenpgp * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description :

Bug#1087145: ITP: libbuiltin-compat-perl -- module providing builtin functions for older perl versions

Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libbuiltin-compat-perl Version : 0.003003 Upstream Author : haarg - Graham Knop (cpan:HAARG) * URL : https://metacpan.org/

Bug#1087023: ITP: tkey-ssh-agent -- SSH Agent for TKey, the flexible open hardware/software USB security key 🔑

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: tkey-ssh-agent Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Tillitis AB * URL : https://github.com/tillitis/tkey-ssh-agent * License : GPL-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : SSH Agent fo

Bug#1087024: ITP: golang-github-tillitis-tkeyclient -- Go package for a TKey client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-tillitis-tkeyclient Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Tillitis AB * URL : https://github.com/tillitis/tkeyclient * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Go Descriptio

Bug#1087025: ITP: golang-github-tillitis-tkeyutil -- A Go package with utility functions for a client application communicating with a Tillitis TKey.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-tillitis-tkeyutil Version : 0.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Tillitis AB * URL : https://github.com/tillitis/tkeyutil * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#1087026: ITP: golang-github-tillitis-tkeysign -- Go package for communicating with Tillitis TKey signer

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-tillitis-tkeysign Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tillitis AB * URL : https://github.com/tillitis/tkeysign * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: RFC: "Recommended bloat", and how to possibly fix ito

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:53:15 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: >On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:20:46AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >> Am 8. November 2024 06:42:25 MEZ schrieb Marc Haber >> : >> >Agreed! And I would also love the possibility to directly paste a >> >package list from apt show's out

Why is knot migration blocked by done 1081191?

Hello, I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I don't understand: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot What do I need to do to finally finish migration? Cheers, Jakub Ružička signature.

Re: Why is knot migration blocked by done 1081191?

Jakub Ružička: Hello, I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I don't understand: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot What do I need to do to finally finish migration? Cheers, Jakub Ruž

Re: Why is knot migration blocked by done 1081191?

* Niels Thykier [241108 14:12]: > Jakub Ružička: > > I've fixed #1081191 through changelog entry in knot/3.4.0-3 and it's > > marked as Done but the bug still blocks knot migration for reasons I > > don't understand: > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=knot > > The problem is that the B

Multiple copies of fatfs in the archive?

Hi! I'm preparing to replace src:fuse-umfuse-fat with https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs, which "has been developed as a replacement for fusefat" (the previous upstream, same vendor, not really relevant), and "is based on the FAT file system module for embedded systems named fatfs by ChaN"