Hi,
Am Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:41:28AM +0100 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Ah I assumed the sources were being taken from pypi, if they are taken
> from GitHub, then that explains yes. Perhaps using
> https://pypi.org/project/catalogue/#files as the URL for uscan (if uscan
> is happy with that one), wo
On 06/11/2024 19:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Le Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:35:59PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt a écrit :
>> Hello, and thanks for your time.
>>
>> I've been a Debian user and contributor for a while, and have noticed a
>> rather frustrating issue that I'm interested in potentially
>> contri
On Thursday, November 7, 2024 12:53:27 PM MST Roger Lynn wrote:
> On 06/11/2024 19:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Le Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:35:59PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt a écrit :
> >> Hello, and thanks for your time.
> >>
> >> I've been a Debian user and contributor for a while, and have noticed
On Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:08:07 -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> Then again,
> given that policy is clear about how Recommends ought to be used and
> it's pretty clear that there are packages that just don't use it right,
I'm sorry but I have to disagree here; it's "pretty clear" for you
but I believe
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:53:27 +
Roger Lynn wrote:
> On 06/11/2024 19:20, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Le Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:35:59PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt a écrit :
> >> Hello, and thanks for your time.
> >>
> >> I've been a Debian user and contributor for a while, and have
> >> noticed a r
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 00:08:22 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Some packages are clearly in Depends, Recommends, or Suggests. Others might
> be right
> on the line between two of the categories. In these cases, a maintainer has
> to make a
> judgement call. If a user thinks they have got it wr
On 07/11/2024 04:12, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
just to get around problematic recommends in Debian's packages.
What about having a way to configure the packaging tools you use to only
consider a whitelist (with pattern match, pin-style) of package
Recommends? This way you could use your metapacka
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:41:28AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 02:01:49 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'd initially misread it as being just a day or two after the yanked
> > version, but you're right, it was months later. I suspect it was simply
> > uscan - it's using the
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 02:01:49 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:42:08AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Given that I assume the current (non-retracted) upstream version is
> > going to be close to surpass the retracted one, I'd go for the +really
> > hack. In this case i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Soren Stoutner
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: feather-wallet
Version : 2.7.0
Upstream Contact: The Monero Project
* URL : https://github.com/feather-wallet/feather
* License : BSD
Programmin
Colin Watson left as an exercise for the reader:
> (https://peps.python.org/pep-0508/#extras): effectively groups of
> additional dependencies to enable some kind of feature that you can opt
> into if you need that feature, rather than having to pick from an
> undifferentiated pile of Recommends, o
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:08:22AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:41:46 PM MST Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> > Again, this isn't a problem limited to a derivative distribution. I
> > respect that your opinion of how Recommends should work differs from
> > mine. That does
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 22:29:07 -0500
"Theodore Ts'o" wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:08:22AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:41:46 PM MST Aaron Rainbolt
> > wrote:
> > > Again, this isn't a problem limited to a derivative distribution.
> > > I respect that yo
On 2024-11-08 00:17, gregor herrmann wrote:
The distinction between Depends, Recommends or Suggests is not a
true/false thing; this is not a question of mathematics or science
but always a judgement call. Adding another category won't solve
anything IMO but only extend the sometimes blurry area.
* Aaron Rainbolt [2024-11-08 00:21]:
[...]
> However, this isn't that hard to rectify - rather than specifying the
> depth at which apt should stop installing recommends, one can specify
> the packages in the dependency tree from which apt should install
> recommends from. I.e., to replicate --no-
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 03:47:05 +0100, Fay Stegerman
wrote:
>I personally would consider a "apt install-recs", analogous to "apt build-dep",
>quite useful. That would require multiple steps instead of a single command,
>but allow installing the recommends for a specific package at any later time,
>wh
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:20:46AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> Am 8. November 2024 06:42:25 MEZ schrieb Marc Haber
> :
> >Agreed! And I would also love the possibility to directly paste a
> >package list from apt show's output into apt install without having to
> >remove the commas.
> >
>
Am 8. November 2024 06:42:25 MEZ schrieb Marc Haber
:
>Agreed! And I would also love the possibility to directly paste a
>package list from apt show's output into apt install without having to
>remove the commas.
>
This!
mfh.her.fsr
IOhannes
18 matches
Mail list logo
