On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:50:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: I know +1
postings are not really welcome.
I've been looking for an excuse to write slightly more than "+1" (to Simon or
Phil's messages, in particular), but "+1" is
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:07:23PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Think again about why we have release names at all: Debian 1.0 never happened
because somebody packaged a pre-release semi-broken version as Debian 1.0 on
their CDs. At that point, Debian chose to also use codenames to refer to
re
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:15:49PM +0200, Alf Gaida wrote:
Only a last thought: Didn't we have really important problems to
solve? It might be only me, but i see the discussion as a minor
variation of bike shedding.
It may not be important to you, but it's evidently important to some people. I
Michael Stone writes ("Re: getting rid of "testing""):
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:29:44PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >As a data point, having "stable" and "testing" stay around is very
> >useful for CI purposes. For example on ci.debian.net all our setup uses
> >"stable" and "testing" inste
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: libjs-scribl
* URL : http://chmille4.github.io/Scribl/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : HTML5 canvas genomics graphic library
To be team maintained on salsa.d.o/med-t
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 12:04:39 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> [What is currently stable, etc.] is available via the ftpmaster API
> service, and by reading symlinks
> in archive mirrors. I think the idea of having this information in a
> .deb too (ideally kept up to date in all in-support releases,
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> Stepping back a bit:
Ian> Can we have a comment from ftpmaster on their view of the rough
Ian> consensus here? I think a Last Call (time-bounded) would be
Ian> good. (I really liked the approach Sam took with the dh
Ian> discussion.)
Dear -devel list,
(Please forward this email to proper mailing lists if there's other lists that
this email would suit in better.)
I noticed that for all bug reports that orphan a package in Debian, a semi-
standard paragraph of words will be provided like this:
...Maintaining a packag
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 01:11:09PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:46:00AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Related to that I would like to be able to write something like
> > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian debian11 main
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/de
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1434 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 157 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
How about getting rid of codenames altogether? Like we use unstable for
unstable, experimental for experimental as it already is, no testing and buster
but debian11, debian12, etc.
Although it is eliminating some funs but it is much more predictable and simple
to remember. I also confused sque
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:16:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Yes please, let's use debian11 in the URL somewhere.
Because debian11 is such a buzz...
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Packager's rule #1: upstream _always_ screws something up. This
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ is true especially if you're packaging your own p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Grzybowski
* Package name: aiorwlock
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Andrew Svetlov
* URL : https://github.com/aio-libs/aiorwlock
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Synchroniza
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 08:51:18AM +0800, Yao Wei (?) wrote:
> How about getting rid of codenames altogether? Like we use unstable
> for unstable, experimental for experimental as it already is, no
> testing and buster but debian11, debian12, etc.
>
> Although it is eliminating some funs
14 matches
Mail list logo
