Re: PPAs (Re: [Idea] Debian User Repository? (Not simply mimicing AUR))

2019-04-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:02 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 4/8/19 7:16 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > >> from PPA (source+binary-based). > > > > If people just want a PPA which supports Debian, please just take a > > look at OBS[1]. > > > > I've seen many upstreams provide packages with OBS, and mos

Usertag (Re: Handling Japanese new era "令和 (Reiwa)")

2019-04-14 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 22:37:15 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926892 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926891 Perhaps it's better to use usertag to track this kind of issue, but usertag is already set. Can we use multiple usertag

Re: Golang >= 1.12 in Buster?

2019-04-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:54:18PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > FWIW, golang-1.12 was removed from buster, because the RT think > there're too many golang for buster[1]. there's no logic in that, and especially with the introduction of this new feature, which the Go community has awaited f

non-free binary upload issue

2019-04-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, I fixed bugreport #926567 [1], and I upload a binary. Apparently my upload was accepted [2], but the binary has not yet show up in Sid: I guess I missed something, or forgot something because I have not upload a binary since a long time. Any hint is welcome. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-04-14 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks. Note that there is no need for the removed architectures to be hosted on debian-ports, especially if you are not satisfi

Re: Hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-{i386,amd64} removal

2019-04-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Aurelien Jarno, le dim. 14 avril 2019 16:08:20 +0200, a ecrit: > On 2019-04-12 23:01, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > How is the move to debian-ports supposed to happen? I won't have the > > time to do anything about it within the 2 weeks. > > Note that there is no need for the removed architectures to

Re: non-free binary upload issue

2019-04-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 17:52 +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > I fixed bugreport #926567 [1], and I upload a binary. > Apparently my upload was accepted [2], but the binary has not yet > show up in Sid: > I guess I missed something, or forgot something because I have not > upload a binary > since a long

Re: Golang >= 1.12 in Buster?

2019-04-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:00:18PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > I strongly think that this decision very wrong and should be reversed. > If the RT absolutely insist on cutting down the number of Go versions, I > am not opposed to see eg. golang-1.11 go, however, as I don't see a > compelling case f

Bug#927070: ITP: ledger2beancount -- Convert Ledger-based textual ledgers to Beancount ones

2019-04-14 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij * Package name: ledger2beancount Version : 1.6 Upstream Author : Stefano Zacchiroli Martin Michlmayr * URL : https://github.com/zacchiro/ledger2beancount * License : GPLv3 Programmi

Re: Golang >= 1.12 in Buster?

2019-04-14 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 14.04.19 um 18:15 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > You shouldn't really complain to the release team, but rather to the > golang maintainers, that couldn't manage to move everything off golang > 1.11 in time. Just for the record, upstream has released golang 1.12 on February 25, so only about two week

Processed: unblock 820036 with 820124, unblock 820036 with 820050, unblock 820036 with 821051

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 820036 with 820124 Bug #820036 [general] Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled 820036 was blocked by: 820041 821053 820129 821088 821307 820052 820008 820038 820010 821051 823003 821084 821055 820124 820050 821054 820036

Bug#820036: Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled

2019-04-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: summary -1 GRUB and Linux images are now signed by the production key trusted by shim-signed. Debian-installer apparently installs the signed packages, but other installation systems are not yet ready. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one

Processed: Re: Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > summary -1 Ignoring request to change the summary of bug 820036 to the same value -- 820036: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820036 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: summary 820036 119

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > summary 820036 119 Summary recorded from message bug 820036 message 119 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 820036: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820036 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Processed: retitle 820036 to Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 820036 Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems Bug #820036 [general] Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled Changed Bug title to 'Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems' from 'Debian does not

Processed: unblock 820036 with 821053

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 820036 with 821053 Bug #820036 [general] Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled 820036 was blocked by: 820129 821054 820038 820010 821307 821053 820052 820041 823003 821084 820008 821088 821055 820036 was not blocking any

Bits from the Release Team: buster freeze update

2019-04-14 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, In this issue: - Architectures - RC bugs status - Upgrade testing - Release notes - Responding to unblock requests Architectures = Debian buster will ship with the same set of architectures as Debian stretch did. RC bugs status == At the time of writing 150 rel

Bug#927083: ITP: golang-github-heroku-rollrus -- Logrus Rollbar Hook

2019-04-14 Thread Dawid Dziurla
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dawid Dziurla * Package name: golang-github-heroku-rollrus Version : 0.0~git20190402.fde2a6b-1 Upstream Author : Heroku * URL : https://github.com/heroku/rollrus * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description