Bug#885065: ITP: node-ifvisible.js -- Determine if a web page is visible in the browser

2017-12-23 Thread Daniel Ring
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Ring X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-ifvisible.js Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : Serkan Yersen * URL : https://github.com/serkanyersen/ifvisible.js * License : Expat Programmi

Bug#885070: ITP: libatteanx-compatibility-trine-perl -- compatibility layer between RDF::Trine and Attean

2017-12-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: libatteanx-compatibility-trine-perl Version : 0.001 Upstream Author : Kjetil Kjernsmo * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/AtteanX-Compatibility-T

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-12-23 11:53:38 +0800 (+0800), Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > (ie: the Apache license doesn't require listing copyright holders). > > IANAL, but it seems pretty clear to me that this is not the case, at > least for source packages (see 4.c),

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 22 décembre 2017 19:58 -0800, Russ Allbery  : >> IANAL, but it seems pretty clear to me that this is not the case, at >> least for source packages (see 4.c), for binary packages we also have to >> distribute any associated NOTICE files (see 4.d, but I guess we violate >> this rule quite a lot),

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Vincent Bernat writes: > ❦ 22 décembre 2017 19:58 -0800, Russ Allbery  : >> I just found a few packages under Apache 2.0 that didn't distribute the >> NOTICE file. It turned out that the same information was in >> debian/copyright, but that may not be the case in the future. >> I'll file a wis

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:51:37 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >Marc, I don't want you to take this as me beating up on you, because that's >not my intent, but I find your tone frustrating. The FTP Team is not a closed >cabal. There are regular calls for volunteers (there is a new set of FTP >Tra

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On December 23, 2017 2:20:43 PM EST, Marc Haber wrote: >On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:51:37 -0500, Scott Kitterman > wrote: >>Marc, I don't want you to take this as me beating up on you, because >that's >>not my intent, but I find your tone frustrating. The FTP Team is not >a closed >>cabal. There

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Scott Kitterman writes: > As much as people find writing debian/copyright, imagine the pain > associated with checking it. Personally, I don't want it to be any > harder than it has to be. I'm currently canvasing other members of the > FTP Team to understand what everyone thinks is correct. Th

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-12-23 15:15:35 -0800 (-0800), Russ Allbery wrote: [...] > I think a separate (public) mailing list dedicated to this would > be ideal [...] As in debian-legal@l.d.o or a completely new ML specifically for copyright documentation discussions? -- Jeremy Stanley

Re: Why do we list individual copyright holders?

2017-12-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Jeremy Stanley writes: > On 2017-12-23 15:15:35 -0800 (-0800), Russ Allbery wrote: > [...] >> I think a separate (public) mailing list dedicated to this would >> be ideal > [...] > As in debian-legal@l.d.o or a completely new ML specifically for > copyright documentation discussions? debian-lega