❦ 22 décembre 2017 19:58 -0800, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> :
>> IANAL, but it seems pretty clear to me that this is not the case, at >> least for source packages (see 4.c), for binary packages we also have to >> distribute any associated NOTICE files (see 4.d, but I guess we violate >> this rule quite a lot), which I would guess usually contain copyright >> information. > >> https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > I just found a few packages under Apache 2.0 that didn't distribute the > NOTICE file. It turned out that the same information was in > debian/copyright, but that may not be the case in the future. > > I'll file a wishlist bug against Lintian to check for a NOTICE file in > packages that say they're under Apache 2.0 and warn if it's not included > in the binary package. 4.d also says NOTICE can be distributed in the source form when it is distributed along the derivative work (which is our case). Unrelated, but I am developing some kind of "lintian fatigue". People may find helpful to let Lintian warn about every little thing. Each time I have to update a package, I have new lintian notices and/or warnings. Sometimes Lintian is right, sometimes it's not. Most of the time, this is quite pointless for me. Related, this d/copyright stuff is also pointless to me (for the same reasons pointed by zigo). -- The naked truth of it is, I have no shirt. -- William Shakespeare, "Love's Labour's Lost"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
