On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:03:13AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:18:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
> wrote:
> >I didn't say RPM *doesn't* deal with changed files; I said ours deals
> >with it better. I stand by that.
>
> Given that dpkg's conffile handling still has much headroom f
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 07:53 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> The "packages drop files in /usr/*, sysadmins override in /etc" way of
>>> doing things is prevalent in the RPM world; in Debia
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Luca Capello wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:05:10 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> You can't dist-upgrade RHEL from 6 to 7 and you can't dist-upgrade
>> Debian from 6 to 8 in one leap.
>
> Debian *does* support dist-upgrading between *following* releases only,
> which is
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Brian May wrote:
> On 2017-04-27 16:19, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>>
>> It seems you've missed the point (which was about 4 years between RHEL
>> releases).
>
> There was almost three years between Woody (July 19th 2002) and Sarge (June
> 6th 2005), yet we still al
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: qupzilla
Version: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like$
Upstream Author: [NAME ]
URL: [http://example.com]
License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.]
Description: It crashes when accepting-exempting expired certificates
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: python-pyqrcode
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Michael Nooner
* URL : https://github.com/mnooner256/pyqrcode
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python modul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: pypng
Version : 0.0.18
Upstream Author : David Jones
* URL : https://github.com/drj11/pypng
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Pure Python PNG Reader/Writer
T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ro...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-ripemd160
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : FIX_ME upstream author
* URL : https://github.com/crypto-browserify/ripemd160#readme
* License :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Forum,
as I have some trouble with uploading through ftp,
I am trying to upload via sftp/scp to ssh.upload.debian.org .
So far I failed. I suspect that my public is not there:
how can we check it ? how can we put our pub key there ?
Thanks in
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:42:46PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> as I have some trouble with uploading through ftp,
> I am trying to upload via sftp/scp to ssh.upload.debian.org .
> So far I failed. I suspect that my public is not there:
> how can we check it ? how can we put our pub key there ?
I
The bug submitter followed up by private mail to me only; I'm cc:ing
the bug report before closing it to provide a reasoned follow-up.
- Forwarded message from Luis Duarte -
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:36:29 +0100
From: Luis Duarte
To: Gunnar Wolf
Subject: Re: Bug#860714: general: disk b
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:21:17AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> Did Linux development move as quickly as it does now?
> Did users experience more problems or failures when running those
> dist-upgrades?
RedHat also did not support upgrades back when they did not wait four
years to do finish a new releas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 860714 + unreproducible
Bug #860714 [general] general: disk became full after running a perl program
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
860714: http://bugs.debian.org/
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:09:07 -0500
with message-id <20170428160907.gb66...@gwolf.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#860714: general: disk became full after running a perl
program
has caused the Debian Bug report #860714,
regarding general: disk became full after running a perl program
t
Russ Allbery writes:
> Yup, this. It works because we support it, test it, treat bugs in the
> upgrade process as critical, and take it into account in our release
> engineering. It's a lot of work.
> Red Hat has chosen not to do that work, so they don't support it. It's
> a tradeoff decision
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-sntp
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Eran Hammer (http://hueniverse.com)
* URL : https://github.com/hueniverse/sntp#readme
* License : BSD
16 matches
Mail list logo
