Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shanavas M
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : node-is-arrayish
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author: Qix (http://github.com/qix-)
* URL : https://github.com/qix-/node-is-arrayish#readm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-filename-regex
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/regexps/filename-regex
On 10/17/2016 08:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Philipp Kern (2016-10-17):
>> On 10/17/2016 05:39 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> AFAICT from a recent https deployment, apt will perform a TLS handshake
>>> for each and every file it downloads from the mirror; including indices,
>>> translations, p
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your reply.
Although these packages are not API-compatible, they are using the
same installation path and file name; therefore, I think "Conflict:"
section is needed.
--
Sun-Ze Lin (林上智)
2016-10-17 2:27 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski :
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:36:31AM +0200
Hi folks,
zur RAM Erweiterung gibt es heute um 12:00 eine kurze Downtime
der Jenkins Server
invde8i001
mbrjenkins01
nvode7i001
semde7i001
sprjenkins01
Regards
Harri
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:36:56PM +0800, SZ Lin (林上智) wrote:
> Although these packages are not API-compatible, they are using the
> same installation path and file name; therefore, I think "Conflict:"
> section is needed.
The problem with this is that this prevents our users from having both
of t
"SZ Lin (林上智)" writes:
> Although these packages are not API-compatible, they are using the
> same installation path and file name; therefore, I think "Conflict:"
> section is needed.
Note that Policy explicitly forbids using "Conflicts" in this case, see
the first paragraph in [1].
[1]
❦ 18 octobre 2016 09:08 +0800, Paul Wise :
>> These are distinct packages, with distinct version numbers, and packages
>> will need to declare (potentially versioned) dependencies on them.
>
> Has anyone involved in the node ecosystem tried to talk the respective
> upstreams into creating a stan
Hi Ansgar,
Thanks for your reply.
I think this situation meets the condition.
The case of two programs having the same functionality but different
> implementations is handled via "alternatives" or the "Conflicts" mechanism.
These two programs having the same functionality - implementation of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-normalize-path
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/normaliz
On 2016-10-17 21:25, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Thing I would like to see, is that all those "node js package" get
> their own component. ( 'main', 'contrib' and 'non-free' are components )
I personally dislike the Node.js nano-packaging approach, but
there is no fundamental reason why this dislike o
On 2016-10-18 9:52, SZ Lin wrote:
I think this situation meets the condition.
The case of two programs having the same functionality but different
implementations is handled via "alternatives" or the "Conflicts"
mechanism.
These two programs having the same functionality - implementation of
R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: tendermint-go-logger
Version : Git snapshot
Upstream Author : Tendermint project
* URL : http://www.tendermint.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Golang
Description : Ten
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-glob-parent
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Elan Shanker
* URL : https://github.com/es128/glob-parent
* License : ISC
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alvaro Lopez Garcia
* Package name: python-dirq
Version : 1.7.1
Upstream Author : Konstantin Skaburskas
* URL : https://github.com/cern-mig/python-dirq
* License : Apache2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-inflight
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter (http://blog.izs.me/)
* URL : https://github.com/isaacs/inflight
* License : I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-dotfile
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/is-dotfile
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
* Package name: nutsqlite
Version : 1.9.9.2
Upstream Author : Jim Jozwiak
* URL : http://nut.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Tcl/Tk
Description : Dietary nutrition analysis
Peter Dolding writes ("Bug#820036: No bug mentioning a Debian KEK and booting
use it."):
> Yes it one thing to get shim signed by Microsoft. Do remember
> Microsoft is free to push out updates to the The Forbidden Signatures
> Database(dbx).
>
> [etc.]
I'm afraid I can't make sense of this. Y
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#840669: Bug#840669:
Beware of leftover gpg-agent processes"):
> On Sat 2016-10-15 11:21:29 -0400, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 1. gnupg1-compatible authorisation lifetime:
>
> I believe this is a deliberate change in semantics from the upstream
> G
Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Package name conflict question"):
> I don't have a solution for this. The ideal solution would be for one
> or both upstream developers to rename their library. However, that's
> only ideal in the long run, since it requires every program that uses
> the libraries to be
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't make sense of this. You have posted it to
> debian-devel, but without any kind of sensible explanation of the
> context.
It was posted to bug #820036, which is tracking Debian support for
secure boot. Peter was advocating q
Sorry for the noise, that was a bad To: address.
Regards
Harri
On 10/18/2016 09:14 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> zur RAM Erweiterung gibt es heute um 12:00 eine kurze Downtime
> der Jenkins Server
>
> invde8i001
> mbrjenkins01
> nvode7i001
> semde7i001
>
On 2016-10-17 at 17:53, Bart Schouten wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath schreef op 17-10-2016 18:26:
>
>> On Oct 17 2016, Bart Schouten wrote:
>>
>>> (And I write SystemD with caps because that makes it easier to
>>> read, people invented capitals for a reason).
>>
>> What would you think some people con
Ben Finney writes:
> I am preparing a new version of ‘dput’ that stops using ‘/usr/bin/gpg’,
> and instead uses the GPGME library for GnuPG operations.
> […]
> If your packaging workflow has unusual signing practices, or an unusual
> GnuPG configuration, your help will be especially valuable to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-os-homedir
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
(sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/os-homedir#readme
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-primitive
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/is-primiti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-pify
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
(sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/pify
* License : Expat
Pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-fs.realpath
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter (http://blog.izs.me/)
* URL : https://github.com/isaacs/fs.realpath#readme
* Licen
Pirate Praveen wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Pirate Praveen
>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
>* Package name: node-os-homedir
> Version : 1.0.2
> Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
>(sindresorhus.com)
>* URL : https://github.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-signal-exit
Version : 3.0.1
Upstream Author : Ben Coe
* URL : https://github.com/tapjs/signal-exit
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Java
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> The code, well...
>
> if (process.platform === 'linux') {
> return home || (process.getuid() === 0 ? '/root' : (user ?
> '/home/' + user : null));
> }
>
> Things are more complicated than that. What exact
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 07:57 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> /me args at YA tiny JS lump. It's tiny, and wrong. Probably. But it's
> difficult to tell with such a small "Description". Please add some
> useful text.
This is packaged because its a dependency for grunt.
> The code, well...
>
>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:40:49PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>On Tuesday 18 October 2016 07:57 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> /me args at YA tiny JS lump. It's tiny, and wrong. Probably. But it's
>> difficult to tell with such a small "Description". Please add some
>> useful text.
>
>This is packa
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> The code, well...
>>
>> if (process.platform === 'linux') {
>> return home || (process.getuid() === 0 ? '/root' : (user ?
>> '/home/' + user : null));
>
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:45 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> That doesn't fix (or excuse) poor packaging, though.
Are you saying this is RC? We have different level for bugs, this would
be wishlist. I don't mind someone writing a better description.
> Life's too short to go and fix all the crap i
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> into Debian until it's fixed.
I agree this could be marked RC and stopped from going to a stable
release. But do we stop accepting new packages in unstable because
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:49:27PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> > into Debian until it's fixed.
>
> This is already reported upstream
> https://github.com/sindr
❦ 18 octobre 2016 17:57 +0300, Lars Wirzenius :
>> The code, well...
>>
>> if (process.platform === 'linux') {
>> return home || (process.getuid() === 0 ? '/root' : (user ?
>> '/home/' + user : null));
>> }
>>
>> Things are more complicated than that. What exactly is th
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:59:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> > into Debian until it's fixed.
>
> I agree this could be marked RC and stopped from going to a
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:40:49PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I don't particularly enjoy doing this either. Please direct your anger
> at the nodejs developers. I'm doing this only because the packages I
> care (diaspora and gitlab won't be accepted in main, unless I build
> libjs-handlebars an
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>...
> Life's too short to go and fix all the crap in the world personally,
> but we can keep certain minimum standards for what we as a group allow
> into Debian. :-(
What policies and processes should ensure these minimum standards?
* Lars Wirzenius , 2016-10-18, 17:57:
if (process.platform === 'linux') {
return home || (process.getuid() === 0 ? '/root' : (user ?
'/home/' + user : null));
}
Things are more complicated than that. What exactly is this code meant to be
used for?
This is so w
Pirate Praveen wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:45 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> That doesn't fix (or excuse) poor packaging, though.
>
>Are you saying this is RC? We have different level for bugs, this would
>be wishlist. I don't mind someone writing a better description.
I'd b
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> it's only used as a fallback for nodejs < 4. Debian currently has 4.6.0.
Does this mean the ITP can be closed?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:03:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The WTFness of this code is certainly way above what we're normally used to,
> but (AIUI) it's only used as a fallback for nodejs < 4. Debian currently has
> 4.6.0.
In that case, perhaps this package isn't needed in Debian at all?
> >
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Bug#820036: No bug mentioning a Debian KEK and booting
use it."):
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm afraid I can't make sense of this. You have posted it to
> > debian-devel, but without any kind of sensible explanation of the
> > context.
>
> I
Quoting Lars Wirzenius (2016-10-18 17:44:50)
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:59:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
> > > into Debian until it's fixed.
> >
> > I a
* Lars Wirzenius , 2016-10-18, 19:14:
The WTFness of this code is certainly way above what we're normally used to,
but (AIUI) it's only used as a fallback for nodejs < 4. Debian currently has
4.6.0.
In that case, perhaps this package isn't needed in Debian at all?
You would have to patch the
Quoting Lars Wirzenius :
Even though I object to this one package (until it's fixed upstream),
I don't want to discourage you from working on this. It's important
work (because diaspora and gitlab are important pieces of free
software). It's unfortunate you get to be the focal point of a lot of
n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-hosted-git-info
Version : 2.1.5
Upstream Author : Rebecca Turner (http://re-becca.org)
* URL : https://github.com/npm/hosted-git-info
* License
On 10/18/2016 05:29 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 08:27 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> This is so wrong, I would like to ask that this package not be allowed
>> into Debian until it's fixed.
>
> I agree this could be marked RC and stopped from going to a stable
> release. Bu
On 10/18/2016 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Lars Wirzenius , 2016-10-18, 19:14:
>>> The WTFness of this code is certainly way above what we're normally
>>> used to, but (AIUI) it's only used as a fallback for nodejs < 4.
>>> Debian currently has 4.6.0.
>> In that case, perhaps this package isn't
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:03 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> If the package so clearly fails to achieve its _only_ goal as in
> this case, I think it's a good idea to delay accepting it into the
> archive until it's fixed.
>
> That said, I don't want to discourage you, and to provide something
>
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 11:00 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> binary:node-os-homedir is NEW.
> source:node-os-homedir is NEW.
>
> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> OpenPGP sig
Not subscribed so this will break threading.
On 2016-10-17 at 17:53, Bart Schouten wrote:
I would consider that bigotry as SystemD is short pretty much for
System Daemon.
While this is a reasonable point, it doesn't invalidate Nikolas' point:
that the people behind the systemd project A: d
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Paul Tagliamonte
>
> > So, when are we going to push this? If not now, what criteria need to
> > be met? Why can't we https-ify the default CDN mirror today?
>
> The usual crypto answer: because key handling is hard.
>
> Doing this for the per-country mirrors means t
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> If that is the case then they have enbedded hostility into their name simply
> becaus eit offends normal grammar roles.
I don't that's it at all.
The reason many people react to the SystemD spelling is becuase, for
some years now, trolls use
On Oct 17, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Have we gotten to the point where we consider deb.d.o suitable for
> production use? The web page still says Experimental (so I would assume
I do not think that it is appropriate for general use, since at least
one of the CDNs backing it lacks nodes in many (most
On Tue 2016-10-18 07:44:43 -0400, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#840669: Bug#840669:
> Beware of leftover gpg-agent processes"):
>> On Sat 2016-10-15 11:21:29 -0400, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> > 1. gnupg1-compatible authorisation lifetime:
>>
>> I believe t
>> On 14458 March 1977, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>> > If I package a compiler and put y.tab.c in the package, drop
>> > grammar.y in d/m-s/, would it be OK or not?
>> If you come up with a good reason for it, yes. But I doubt you would
>> find one here.
> Let's say I need a special tool to compile
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Xen wrote:
>> If that is the case then they have enbedded hostility into their name simply
>> becaus eit offends normal grammar roles.
>
> I don't that's it at all.
>
> The reason many people react
On Oct 18 2016, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Xen wrote:
>>> If that is the case then they have enbedded hostility into their name simply
>>> becaus eit offends normal grammar roles.
>>
>> I don't that'
Cameron Norman writes:
> Those reading so much into such a small and understandable
> capitalization mistake (SystemV -> SystemD) should learn to take
> themselves less seriously and view things from different perspectives.
You will find that when you point out the correct spelling to those who
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:11:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> You will find that when you point out the correct spelling to those who
> use this one, the response is not "oh, whoops," like it would be for a
> mistake. Rather, it's usually a rant of surprising vitriol, a bunch of
> bizarrely cons
65 matches
Mail list logo