Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

Dne 8.6.2016 v 23:51 Barry Warsaw napsal(a): > On Jun 07, 2016, at 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> I have started a wiki page to compare gitolite and gitlab >> https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/GitNext > > Another possible option is Pagure > > https://pagure.io/ > > Written in Python and deve

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:04PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Another possible option is Pagure > > https://pagure.io/ > > Written in Python and developed by Fedora. Most have probably seen it, but here's a good review of pagure: -- Sean Whitton signatur

Re: Pagure and Gitolite for project+code hosting

Ben Finney writes: > Barry Warsaw writes: > > > Another possible option is Pagure > > https://pagure.io/ > > Wow, that's an attractive option. Thanks! Recently reviewed at Linux Weekly News: “Pagure and Fedora” https://lwn.net/Articles/687821/>. > > Written in Python and developed by Fedora. >

Open Source Definition (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project))

I wrote: > > You are not alone, but please do not call Gitlab CE not "real open source". On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:40:16PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > I do for every software which forces me to sign things like: snip I do not mean to say that your concerns are not valid; but it's important we

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:31:17PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I must say that those .net => .org migrations have been a nuisance for > years. For me, at least. Oh yes, I appreciate that, it is a problem. But I don't see an alternative, I can't realistically see GitLab for Debian getting off the g

Re: Genesis of the git.d.o/gitlab.d.o confusion (Was: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:46:56PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > Let me rephrase, then: can we have a plan that addresses alioth / git / > gitolite / gitlab / stuff rather than standing up yet another SCM/PM tool > because it's shiny? > > This has more to do with delivering sustainable services w

Bug#826850: ITP: r-cran-mlmrev -- GNU R Examples from Multilevel Modelling Software Review

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-mlmrev Version : 1.0-6 Upstream Author : Steve Walker * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mlmRev/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: GNU R Description : GNU R Exampl

Bug#826852: ITP: python-watcherclient -- OpenStack Cloud Optimization as a Service client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-watcherclient Version : 0.23.0 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-watcherclient * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python De

Bug#826853: ITP: watcher -- OpenStack Cloud Optimization as a Service server package

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: watcher Version : 0.27.0 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/watcher * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : OpenStack

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 06:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I don't see what's so unreasonable about that.  They're asking you to > > provide the same licence for your contributions, as the licence for the > > existing Gitlab softwar

Bug#826861: ITP: r-cran-mlbench -- GNU R Machine Learning Benchmark Problems

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-mlbench Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Friedrich Leisch * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mlbench/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: GNU R Description : GNU R

Re: Pagure and Gitolite for project+code hosting

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > Ben Finney writes: > > > Barry Warsaw writes: > > > > > Another possible option is Pagure > > > https://pagure.io/ > > > > Wow, that's an attractive option. Thanks! > > Recently reviewed at Linux Weekly News: “Pagure and Fedora” > https://lwn.net/Articl

Re: Pagure and Gitolite for project+code hosting

On 09/06/16 12:21 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > >> Ben Finney writes: >> >>> Barry Warsaw writes: >>> Another possible option is Pagure https://pagure.io/ >>> >>> Wow, that's an attractive option. Thanks! >> >> Recently reviewed at Linux Weekly N

Telecommunication list

Hi, Would you be interested in *Telecommunication *list for your Email marketing campaigns? We can provide you Database Specifically from North America, Latin America, EMEA, and APAC. *Information Fields* – Name, Title, Email, Phone Numbers, Company Name, and Company Details like Physical Addres

Work-needing packages report for Jun 10, 2016

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 735 (new: 12) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 177 (new: 4) Total number of packages reques