On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 06:12 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. They're asking you to > > provide the same licence for your contributions, as the licence for the > > existing Gitlab software. Every FOSS project expects that, even if > > they don't make such a formal statement of it. > > If all they want is to have contributions use the same license as the > code they provide, why is that license not enough? Why is a separate > contributor license agreement needed?
It's not a copyleft licence. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Humour is the best antidote to reality.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
