On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:24:01PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Thorsten Glaser , 2014-02-26, 12:54:
> >To add insult to injury, buildd/sbuild currently hardcode both
> >--apt-update --no-apt-dist-upgrade
>
> My sbuild.conf contains this:
>
> # APT_DISTUPGRADE
> # Type: BOOL
> # APT distupgrade.
Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/db2f0f4e-6f63-4246-a1cd-7a509f378...@me.com
Hello,
On 28 February 2014 10:35, Solal Rastier wrote:
> Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
Could you please elaborate your question?
--
Cheers,
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Le vendredi 28 février 2014 à 10:35 +0100, Solal Rastier a écrit :
> Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
Maybe because of
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=firmware-nonfree
or
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=flashplugin-nonfree
Cheers,
--
.''`.Jo
* Solal Rastier , 2014-02-28, 10:35:
Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 10:35:15 schreef Solal Rastier:
> Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
Because unfortunately the free software foundation believes documentation
doesn't need to be free, and we can't put non-free documentation in main.
--
This end should poin
Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> Op vrijdag 28 februari 2014 12:42:39 schreef u:
>> The FSF believe documentation need to be free, and that's true...
>
> It is true that it needs to be free, but their license just isn't f
Hi,
we have documented how one can improve Tails by working on Debian:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/debian/
I'm posting this here in the hope it may be useful for other
derivatives, for Debian, and for Tails. Feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer
Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit :
> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt.
Please don't top-post.
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
Regards.
PS: full stop.
>
> Le 28 févr. 2014 à 12:46, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
In data venerdì 28 febbraio 2014 10.35.15, Solal Rastier ha scritto:
> Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed?
don't feed the troll please
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse
1. I'm not a troll
2. What is "top-post"?
3. Why I need stop?
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 13:10, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 28/02/2014 12:56, Solal Rastier a écrit :
>> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
>
> I applause this almost inconspicuous troll attempt.
>
> Please don't top-
Hello,
for some of my packages, I would like to update the repacking
of the upstream source ball:
what is the versionning debian custom ?
Let assume the following name:
pi_3.14+ds.orig.tar.xz
May I name the upgrade version something as
pi_3.14+ds1.orig.tar.xz ?
Thanks in advance,
best regards,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:21:57PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for some of my packages, I would like to update the repacking
> of the upstream source ball:
> what is the versionning debian custom ?
>
> Let assume the following name:
> pi_3.14+ds.orig.tar.xz
>
> May I name the upgrad
Quoting intrigeri (2014-02-28 13:08:27)
> we have documented how one can improve Tails by working on Debian:
>
> https://tails.boum.org/contribute/how/debian/
>
> I'm posting this here in the hope it may be useful for other
> derivatives, for Debian, and for Tails. Feedback is welcome.
Really
Chris Knadle writes ("ITA: mumble -- Low latency VoIP client"):
> Ron -- I believe the BTS and PTS likely didn't notify you via email, so I
> wanted to let you know that I filed an ITA [1] on the mumble package
> yesterday.
>
> I'm open to discussing this if your or anyone wishes to.
Ah, good,
That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit :
>> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
>
> contrib and non-free are not part of Debian releases. Real
I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom
indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry.
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 18:24, Octavio Alvarez a écrit :
> On 02/28/2014 05:18 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
>> 1. I'm not a troll
>> 2. What is "top-post"?
>> 3. Why I need stop?
>
> Hi, So
Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a écrit :
> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
>> I not compare Debian with Windows. The FSF publishes a GNU/Linux freedom
>> indicator. Debian is proprietary, sorry.
>
> Ah! The FSF website [1] says otherwise. The FSF website acknowledges
> D
Hi Solal,
2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier :
> Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a écrit
> :
>
>> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
> My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare Windows and Debian.
> Windows is proprietariest than Debian, but Debian isn'
Holger Levsen writes:
> FTWwonder why alioth seems to be hacked now...
...
> this mail forwarding is inspired by two different mails wondering why the
> "alioth" ssh host keys have changed
Holger,
Thanks for forwarding this mail. I'm rather late to the game and only
now discovered the change in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "gustavo panizzo "
* Package name: asciinema
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Marcin Kulik
* URL : https://asciinema.org
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Record and share your terminal se
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:21:13 +0100
Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Solal,
>
> 2014-02-28 19:24 GMT+01:00 Solal Rastier :
> > Le 28 févr. 2014 à 19:22, Octavio Alvarez a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> On 02/28/2014 09:29 AM, Solal Rastier wrote:
>
> > My mail client top-posting automtically. I don't compare W
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James McCoy
* Package name: pangoterm
Version : 0~20140228
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/pangoterm/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : GTK/Pango-based
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James McCoy
* Package name: libvterm
Version : 0~20140228
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL : http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : abstract library
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:42:36PM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> * Package name: asciinema
> * URL : https://asciinema.org
> Description : Record and share your terminal sessions, the right
> way
>
> Forget screen recording apps and blurry video. Enjoy a lightweight,
> p
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:10:00AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Are there any reasons to use this over ttyrec or termrec? It seems to me
> asciinema is strictly worse than:
> ttyrec tmpfile && POST http://asciinema's_url
Is it the same protocol? Nice of asciinema to support it.
> * you can't do
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Solal Rastier wrote:
> That's not an answer. For users, that doesn't change anything.
>
> Le 28 févr. 2014 à 15:20, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
>> Solal Rastier, le Fri 28 Feb 2014 12:56:00 +0100, a écrit :
>>> Further proof that Debian is proprietary software...
27 matches
Mail list logo
