Bug#723724: ITP: rel2gpx -- create GPX-track from OSM relation

2013-09-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: rel2gpx Version : 0.26 Upstream Author : Rainer Unseld * URL : http://mr-unseld.de/?q=de/node/170 * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Perl Description : create GPX-track from OSM rela

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)

2013-09-19 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of > that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which > port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an > overview of which of the porters are (s

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

2013-09-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! I'm not a DD or DM, but an upstream contributor and maintainer for the toolchain, both for different things at work, and in my free time for the Hurd. I have no plans to stop this, so this will cover the jessie lifetime. As time permits, I also work on the Hurd itself, and advise contributor

packaging Postgres binary dump files

2013-09-19 Thread Daniel Pocock
PostBooks distributes their schema as a Postgres binary dump file for use with pg_restore They are available for download here (not in the source tarball): http://sourceforge.net/projects/postbooks/files/03%20PostBooks-databases/4.1.0/ The pg_dump documentation explains the binary format fe

Re: packaging Postgres binary dump files

2013-09-19 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On 19 September 2013 14:42, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > PostBooks distributes their schema as a Postgres binary dump file for > use with pg_restore > > They are available for download here (not in the source tarball): > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/postbooks/files/03%20PostBooks-databases/4

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:42:17PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Adam Borowski writes > > Here's one way: > > rm -rf .pc debian/patches > > echo single-debian-patch >>debian/source/options > > > > The rm needs to be repeated, either in the "clean" target or perhaps by > > dgit. > > I don't think re

Bug#723747: ITP: libfreecontact-perl -- fast protein contact predictor - binding for Perl

2013-09-19 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Laszlo Kajan -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: libfreecontact-perl Version : 0.08 Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan * URL : http://rostlab.org/ * License : GPL-1+ or Artistic Programming Lang:

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Ian Jackson wrote: > I don't think removing .pc and debian/patches will DTRT because > dpkg-source -x will produce a directory containing them. dgit's idea > of "the source tree from the source package" is "whatever dpkg-source > -x produces". You could decide that the canoni

Debian-7.1.0-amd64 is not compatible with ASUS N550JV. 64 BIT UEFI PC

2013-09-19 Thread Jhonatan Ospina
Debian-7.1.0-amd64 is not compatible with ASUS N550JV. 64 BIT UEFI PC Problems with drivers for, SonicMaster Premium with quad-speaker array Qualcomm Atheros Wireless ASUS USB Charger Plus ATKACPI driver and hotkey-related utilities: illuminated keybo

Problem Installation of Debian 7.1

2013-09-19 Thread Mika Mika
Good Morning I have problem of installation about debian 7.1. I have computer intel 64 bit. When I born your iso ia64 which weigh 647Mo. I can't boot. However, I can boot with the 7.0 live CD amd 64. Unfortunately your live cd is not available for 7.1. If you can show me how should I do ? Th

Re: Problem Installation of Debian 7.1

2013-09-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Mika Mika writes: > I have problem of installation about debian 7.1. I have computer intel > 64 bit. When I born your iso ia64 which weigh 647Mo. I think you got the wrong ISO. You almost certainly want amd64, not ia64. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Re: Problem Installation of Debian 7.1

2013-09-19 Thread Julián Moreno Patiño
Hello Mika, You are choosing the wrong installer. Please use this: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.1.0/amd64/iso-cd/ Kind regards, 2013/9/19 Mika Mika : > > > Good Morning > > I have problem of installation about debian 7.1. I have computer intel 64 > bit. When I born your iso ia64 which

Bug#723771: ITP: python-freecontact -- fast protein contact predictor - binding for Python

2013-09-19 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Laszlo Kajan -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: python-freecontact Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan * URL : http://rostlab.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: C++, Python

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:25:06PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: [...] > I don't understand the arguments against 3.0 (git). For every 3.0 (quilt) > package, you can produce a 3.0 (git) with exactly the same data (but not > metadata[1]) bits. > > It is claimed that it can smuggle some not visible

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Hutchings writes: > Of course unreachable objects should be pruned from a 3.0 (git) package. > But I believe the FTP team's concerns are about *reachable* objects that > may be copyright violations. It is hard enough to check this for one > version. I think Adam's point is that there's a on

Bug#723786: ITP: php5-v8js -- V8 Javascript Engine for PHP

2013-09-19 Thread Jonas Genannt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Genannt -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: php5-v8js Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Jani Taskinen * URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/v8js * License : PHP Programming Lang: C De

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)

2013-09-19 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far. > First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied! > > So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures: > >hurd-i386 >

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:31:32AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes: > > > Of course unreachable objects should be pruned from a 3.0 (git) package. > > But I believe the FTP team's concerns are about *reachable* objects that > > may be copyright violations. It is hard enough to

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery writes: > Adam Borowski writes: >> You can trim the history at any commits you want. > Trimming the history of commits doesn't help. In order to have > something that's equivalent from a license review standpoint, you have > to rebase all of the commits into something akin to the

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

2013-09-19 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'm particularly keen to see communication packages working on as many architectures as possible because otherwise two-way communications opportunities are missed if some users are excluded. In short, I'm not formally volunteering, but if people

Re: Status of dgit (good for NMUs and fast-forwarding Debian branches)

2013-09-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam Borowski writes: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:31:32AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think Adam's point is that there's a one-to-one correspondance >> between a 3.0 (quilt) package and a 3.0 (git) package that consists >> solely of an import of the most recent upstream source plus one commi

PostBooks packaging update, new alioth group

2013-09-19 Thread Daniel Pocock
Andrew and I have been going over the PostBooks packages, first uploads in the NEW queue We have an alioth group now: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-xtuple/ and a mailing list: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xtuple-maintainers so please join us. The packages

packaging data that can't be distributed as part of a Debian package

2013-09-19 Thread Faheem Mitha
Hi, I have a situation where I have some software I want to package for Debian. This software needs to use some biological data, but I was told by the website I got this data from that I could not redistribute it. So, I suppose anyone using the software needs to download it. I'll provide a

Re: packaging data that can't be distributed as part of a Debian package

2013-09-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote: > So, I suppose anyone using the software needs to download it. I'll > provide a script to download the data, but if I want to build a > Debian package containing that data, how should I do it? Maybe studying other download-and-package packages, like "java-

Work-needing packages report for Sep 20, 2013

2013-09-19 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 538 (new: 2) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 150 (new: 8) Total number of packages request

Bug#723823: ITP: python-diskimage-builder -- Image building tools for Openstack

2013-09-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: python-diskimage-builder Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List * URL : https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder * License : Apache-2.0 Programming La