On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far. > First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied! > > So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures: > > hurd-i386 > ia64 > mips > mipsel > s390x > > I have pinged some people and #d-hurd, so this will hopefully be amended > soon. Remember that the *deadline is 1st of October*. > > In the list above, I excluded: > > amd64 and i386: requirement for porters is waived > s390: Being removed from testing during the Jessie cycle > (Agreement made during the Wheezy release cycle) > > The following table shows the porters for each architecture in > *unstable* that I have data on so far: > > armel: Wookey (DD) > armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD) > kfreebsd-amd64: Christoph Egger (DD), Axel Beckert (DD), > Petr Salinger (!DD), Robert Millan (DD) > kfreebsd-i386: Christoph Egger (DD), Axel Beckert (DD), > Petr Salinger (!DD), Robert Millan (DD) > powerpc: Geoff Levand (!DD), Roger Leigh (DD) > sparc: Axel Beckert (DD), Rainer Herbst (!DD) > > > If you are missing from this list above, then I have missed your email. > Please follow up to this mail with a message-ID (or resend it, > whichever you prefer).
Message-ID: <20130904160124.gt12...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Sent September 4th. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130919145648.gf13...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
