Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-01-24)

2013-01-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 25 janvier 2013 à 07:15 +0100, Christian PERRIER a écrit : > Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net): > > > Pierre Chifflier > >glpi > > I looked briefly at the RC bug for glpi (#694642). It seems that an > embedded Flash file provided with the package has a security issue. I

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-01-24)

2013-01-25 Thread Pierre Chifflier
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:15:43AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net): > > > Pierre Chifflier > >glpi > > I looked briefly at the RC bug for glpi (#694642). It seems that an > embedded Flash file provided with the package has a security issue. > > I

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-01-24)

2013-01-25 Thread Paul Wise
n Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > So all in all it is ugly (as in most PHP webapps), but it doesn’t seem > release-critical to me. The SWF files do not appear appear to have source code in glpi. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Call for DebConf volunteers and DebConf14/15 bids

2013-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:26:00AM +, Moray Allan wrote: > > 3. Please consider joining the DebConf team, whether or not you are > associated with a future bid! There are many possible ways to help in > the months before DebConf, including technical contributions, > fundraising, or speci

Re: Backports upgrade policy (ButAutomaticUpdates:yes)

2013-01-25 Thread Wookey
+++ martin f krafft [2013-01-25 16:06 +1300]: > also sprach David Kalnischkies [2013.01.25.0020 > +1300]: > > You can find much of the same discussion in the bugreport requesting > > implementation of this feature in APT: #596097 > > Thanks for the pointer! I missed this discussion un^Wfortunate

Re: Backports upgrade policy (ButAutomaticUpdates:yes)

2013-01-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Wookey wrote: > +++ martin f krafft [2013-01-25 16:06 +1300]: > > also sprach David Kalnischkies [2013.01.25.0020 > > +1300]: > > > You can find much of the same discussion in the bugreport requesting > > > implementation of this feature in APT: #596097 > > > > Thanks for th

Re: Linux Future

2013-01-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-01-23 20:45:49 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Adam Borowski writes: > > > There are two ways to design a system: > > * a monolithic well-integrated system, granting features and efficiency at > > the cost of portability and hackability > > * the traditional Unix way, with a stress on repl

Re: Backports upgrade policy (ButAutomaticUpdates:yes)

2013-01-25 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 11:19:00 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Now, complete documentation of the Release files, where the tags you can use > in repositories to get such nice functionality like ButAutomaticUpdates... > Does anyone know where such a thing might dwell? I don't think ther

Re: Bootstrappable Debian - proposal of needed changes

2013-01-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, looking over your proposal, I was missing a few things (sorry if this was mentioned in one of the replies, I've only skimmed over the thread). a/ It's good practice to explicitly enable/disable features via configure switches, to have reliable build results in tainted build environments. What

Re: Backports upgrade policy (ButAutomaticUpdates:yes)

2013-01-25 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Wookey wrote: >> +++ martin f krafft [2013-01-25 16:06 +1300]: >> > also sprach David Kalnischkies [2013.01.25.0020 >> > +1300]: >> > > You can find much of the same discussion in the bugreport requesting

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-01-24)

2013-01-25 Thread Steven McDonald
Hi there, On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:47:08 +0100 (CET) ni...@thykier.net (Niels Thykier) wrote: > # #696816 > remove jenkins/1.447.2+dfsg-2 Just for the information of anybody reading this thread, I have just submitted a fix for this bug. It was a trivial backport; the bug was already fixed in upstr

Bug#698951: ITP: libattica -- Attica is a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API version 1.6.

2013-01-25 Thread rm
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: rm * Package name: libattica Version : 4.0.1 Upstream Author : Jonas Erlandsson * URL : http://www.kde.org * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++, QT Description : Attica is a Qt library that implements the Open

Re: Linux Future

2013-01-25 Thread Uoti Urpala
Russ Allbery wrote: > Adam Borowski writes: > > > There are two ways to design a system: > > * a monolithic well-integrated system, granting features and efficiency at > > the cost of portability and hackability > > * the traditional Unix way, with a stress on replaceable tools that do only > >

Re: multiarch dependency hell. build amd64, can't install without also building i386

2013-01-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Paul Johnson gmail.com> writes: > I've just learned that, if I build amd64 packages, I can't install > them for testing because I've not also built the i386 packages. Just test in cowbuilder --login. > That's really inconvenient! I don't understand why there has to be a > linkage between the sh

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-01-24)

2013-01-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 18:56 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Debian QA Group > >bzr-gtk > > > --8<8<-- removals --8<8<-- > > # #697402 > > remove bzr-gtk/0.103.0+bzr792-3 > > As jwilk has already mentioned in the bug