+++ martin f krafft [2013-01-25 16:06 +1300]: > also sprach David Kalnischkies <kalnischk...@gmail.com> [2013.01.25.0020 > +1300]: > > You can find much of the same discussion in the bugreport requesting > > implementation of this feature in APT: #596097 > > Thanks for the pointer! I missed this discussion un^Wfortunately. > Anyway, it seems that most people are in favour of this change, and > your message pretty much sums up the reasons.
You message was not usless as I never knew about the 100 < P < 500 feature, and the need to pin/not pin according to what effect you wanted vs AutomaticUpdates setting. Making this info more widely known would be a useful service so that people get the behaviour they want. (maybe it already is and I'm the only one no-one told, but I doubt it :-) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130125114839.gj5...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
