thank you!
благодарю! :)
Am 23.12.2012 11:43, schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Eduard wrote:
Hello!
How can i add my project into debian-devel repository? For example,
my program is the based on httrack library tool, the GUI for it,
it's the clone from WinHT
Hello John Paul Adrian!
Thank You for this information and for your help!
best regards, viele Grüße,
Eduard
Am 23.12.2012 13:03, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hello Eduard,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Eduard wrote:
Hello!
How can i add my project into debian-devel reposito
Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debian versions by
their nick names, and not their versions.
If I am new to Debian and go to read the manual and I see 'Squeeze', do you
think I am going to know what the fuck that means? No, but if Debian actually
used the official name,
Merry Christmas to you also.
Incidently, I haven't written any the documentation.
Jamie
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Mistikos Nik
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:50:57
To:
Subject: Feedback
Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debia
Anyway, more to point, if you find the format of documentation, hard to work
and perhaps fustrating, you seemed irritable, perhaps firstly best calm down
before writing such an email.
Your email only had as far as I could make out had only one constructive point,
and a tirade of insults. Its on
On 2012-12-25 22:50:57 +1000 (+1000), Mistikos Nik wrote:
[...]
> Debian use to be really popular. Now only old people use it.
[...]
I suddenly feel very old. What distribution do twelve-year-old
trolls use these days, if not Debian? Have we lost our key
demographic?
--
{ WHOIS( STANL3-ARIN ); WW
I guess by twelve year old trolls, you refer to Mistikos?
To be honest, I am not sure I'd respond to him/her like that, they do not just
seem like a troll.
However they seem like someone who perhaps needs to think before they talk, and
spend more time explaining what is bothering them
Jamie
Se
Mistikos Nik dijo [Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:50:57PM +1000]:
> Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debian
> versions by their nick names, and not their versions.
Right, more or less like the Windows documentation authors, where it's
clear that 3.11 < 95 < 98 < ME < XP < Vista < 7
Your logic is inherently flawed.
Fact is, if you do you research you will find that Ubuntu is built from Debian,
thus is a form of it.
Reality is Ubuntu when it first came was very little more than a version of
Debian packaged to be easier to use and install, and slowly is has gained more
uni
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 07:50:57 -0500 (EST), Mistikos Nik wrote:
>
> Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debian
> versions by their nick names, and not their versions.
>
> If I am new to Debian and go to read the manual and I see 'Squeeze',
> do you think I am going to know what
On 12/25/2012 10:55 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
(2) The correspondence between release code names and official version
numbers can be found in the Debian FAQ, point 6.2, entitled "What are all
those names like etch, lenny, etc.?". Here is a link to this item in the
on-line version of the Debian F
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:55:13AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> (1) Official Debian version numbers are not normally assigned until the
> release becomes the stable release.
Not true (anymore).
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:17:40PM +, ja...@jatos.co.uk wrote:
> Merry Christmas to you also.
>
> Incidently, I haven't written any the documentation.
Good to know.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 25.12.2012 15:55, Stephen Powell wrote:
(1) Official Debian version numbers are not normally assigned until
the
release becomes the stable release.
I haven't checked when previous release numbers were announced, but
wheezy's assigned version was public information some time ago - see
http
Mistikos,
In spite of your trollish approach to the topic, let's try to make
something constructive of your request:
On 25/12/12 08:50 AM, Mistikos Nik wrote:
> It constantly refers to Debian versions by their nick names, and not their
> versions.
Please furnish links/references to specific pla
I didn't thought the use of codenames was hardly unique to Debian, remember
Windows Longhorn?
Also remember Windows XP, the practice he moans about is used in a form by the
worlds most used OS.
Also... Does Ubuntu not use names such as Dapper and Breezy?
I think this guy is just too thick to
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 04:55:53PM +, ja...@jatos.co.uk wrote:
> I didn't thought the use of codenames was hardly unique to Debian, remember
> Windows Longhorn?
Codenames for unlreased products are a different story.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Mistikos Nik (kolus...@yandex.com):
> Now only old people use it.
For what reason would that be a problem, by the way?
Merry Christmas to you too, hohoho
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:39:39 -0500 (EST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 25.12.2012 15:55, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> (1) Official Debian version numbers are not normally assigned until
>> the release becomes the stable release.
>
> I haven't checked when previous release numbers were announced, but
Stephen Powell writes:
> Evidently the historical practice has changed recently. I stand
> corrected. Thanks. The /etc/debian_version file, however, does not
> give a release number, and probably won't, until wheezy becomes the
> stable release. It currently simply says, "wheezy/sid".
I beli
Russ Allbery (25/12/2012):
> I believe that's because *unstable* understandably doesn't have a
> meaningful version number, and base-files, like every other package, is
> updated via unstable until the very end of the freeze. If I remember from
> past releases, branching base-files in testing fro
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 19:49:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (not unblocked for wheezy yet.)
>
Lies.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
* Package name: qtchooser
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Intel Corporation
* URL :
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,status%3Aopen+project%3Aqt/qtchooser,n,z
* License : LGPL
Pro
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:50:57PM +1000, Mistikos Nik wrote:
> Debian documentation is a joke.
Ho Ho Ho
Merry Christmas!
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
save on postage.
Its the most counter-intuitive, and non-user friendly name since "Snow
Leopard"!
A very Merry Debian Christmas from Dallas, Texas!
- "Mistikos Nik" wrote:
> Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debian versions by
> their nick names, and not their versions.
> If I am
Mistikos Nik, le Tue 25 Dec 2012 22:50:57 +1000, a écrit :
> If I am new to Debian and go to read the manual and I see 'Squeeze',
> do you think I am going to know what the fuck that means?
Do you actually need to know what that means, except being the name of the
release?
I have never known the
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Using version numbers would be more lacking social skills. People
> prefer nicknames, not versions.
Version numbers are more useful the less familiar you are with the OS
because they have a well-defined order. I've never needed them for
Debian, but, for example, I fin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nick Leverton
* Package name: mp3cat
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Tom Clegg
* URL : http://tomclegg.net/mp3cat
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : reads, writes, splits and combines MP3 files
Hi Paul
Paul Gevers debian.org> writes:
> > The openmotif package has recently been orphaned since the maintainer
> > is MIA.
>
> Not quite, the maintainer said he didn't have time anymore. It is a
> detail anyway.
My apologies, I assumed the package becoming orphaned was a result of me
emaili
Hi,
I havent received any response about my ITA message for Jabberd2 (see
below).
It seems the current maintainer is MIA.
Is it possible someone of the pkg-xmpp-devel group can reply?
I would like to adopt it, but must get a chance to get so ;)
Greetings,
Willem
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:28 +010
Hi,
I just stepped over a difference between bash and busybox. To illustrate I
wrote this simple script:
--
#!/bin/sh
bar () { echo -n $foo; }
foo=1
bar
foo=2 bar
bar
--
bash, zsh, posh output 121
busybox sh, dash, (m)ksh output 122
checkbashisms doesn't complain.
Which of
Hello Timo,
Timo Weingärtner (26/12/2012):
> bash, zsh, posh output 121
>
> busybox sh, dash, (m)ksh output 122
>
> checkbashisms doesn't complain.
>
> Which of the three is wrong? Where shall I file bugs?
>
> When bar is not a function but an external script the output is 121
> with all the
Hi,
2012-12-26, 02:22:45 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Timo Weingärtner (26/12/2012):
> > bash, zsh, posh output 121
> >
> > busybox sh, dash, (m)ksh output 122
> >
> > checkbashisms doesn't complain.
> >
> > Which of the three is wrong? Where shall I file bugs?
> >
> > When bar is not a function
Hi Jamie,
I couldn't tell what this message was supposed to reply to, since you broke the
thread very nicely with that failure of a mail client you're using. So I'm
assuming that this message was addressed at the opening post of this thread,
and ...
On 25/12/2012 23:47, ja...@jatos.co.uk wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: boinctui
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Sergey Suslov
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/boinctui/
* License : GPL-3.0+
Description : Fullscreen text mode manager curses based for BOINC client.
Main Featu
35 matches
Mail list logo
