Hi, 2012-12-26, 02:22:45 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Timo Weingärtner <t...@tiwe.de> (26/12/2012): > > bash, zsh, posh output 121 > > > > busybox sh, dash, (m)ksh output 122 > > > > checkbashisms doesn't complain. > > > > Which of the three is wrong? Where shall I file bugs? > > > > When bar is not a function but an external script the output is 121 > > with all the shells. > > you may want to check something like that: > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#t > ag_02_09_05
Thanks. If I read that correctly bash, zsh, posh are wrong, but I see that changing that might cause trouble. As this might be a source for subtle errors, especially when external scripts are turned into shell functions or vice versa, would you find it useful to add a warning to checkbashisms? Possible portable workarounds might be (depending on what is expected): * foo=2; bar * (foo=2 bar) * oldfoo=$foo; foo=2; bar; foo=$oldfoo; unset oldfoo with the last one hopefully being rarely needed. Greetings Timo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
