Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: aeolus-cli
Version: 0.7.7
Upstream Author: Red Hat, Inc.
URL: https://github.com/aeolusproject/aeolus-cli
License: Apache-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: deltacloud-client
Version: 1.0.5
Upstream Author: 2010-2012 The Apache Software Foundation
URL: http://deltacloud.apache.org/
Hideki Yamane:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Hideki Yamane
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
>
>Package name: aeolus-cli
> Version: 0.7.7
> Upstream Author: Red Hat, Inc.
>
> URL: https://github.com/aeolusproject/
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:16:58 +0100
Thomas Koch wrote:
> Please add some details in the description about "Aeolus Image Factory". What
> is it?
Yes, it's submitted as Bug#694034, "System image generation tool for
various Virtual Machine environment"
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
On 04/12/2012 19:38, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:16:58 +0100
> Thomas Koch wrote:
>> Please add some details in the description about "Aeolus Image Factory".
>> What
>> is it?
>
> Yes, it's submitted as Bug#694034, "System image generation tool for
> various Virtual
Hello fellow Developers,
As we recently announced [1], we have been working on a complete
re-implementation of dput [2]. As of today, the package is available in
Debian Unstable [3] ready for early adoptors.
We'd like to encourage everyone to test the new look and feel of dput,
and, if you're int
Hi,
> As we recently announced [1], we have been working on a complete
> re-implementation of dput [2]. As of today, the package is available in
> Debian Unstable [3] ready for early adoptors.
>
[...]
What are the chances of dput-ng becoming available in backports (well, once we
release, backpor
Barry Warsaw writes ("Re: Contributor agreements and copyright assignment (was
Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems)"):
> FTR: http://www.canonical.com/contributors
That allows Canonical to make proprietary forks of the code (eg, to
engage in the dual licensing business model). This is very
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:35:49PM +, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > As we recently announced [1], we have been working on a complete
> > re-implementation of dput [2]. As of today, the package is available in
> > Debian Unstable [3] ready for early adoptors.
> >
> [...]
>
> What are the
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:35:49PM +, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > As we recently announced [1], we have been working on a complete
> > re-implementation of dput [2]. As of today, the package is available in
> > Debian Unstable [3] ready for early adoptors.
> >
> [...]
>
> What are
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The answer, as it happens, is the very terms of the FSF's copyright
> assignment, which ensures the work remains available under a copyleft
> license. *That* is the gold standard for copyright assignment, by which
> other copyright
On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>It's currently tied to Python 2.7 (but not to a very high degree, it's
>totally backportable).
Mmm, Python 2. Would the authors be open to a Python 3 port? :)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:58:54PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> >It's currently tied to Python 2.7 (but not to a very high degree, it's
> >totally backportable).
>
> Mmm, Python 2. Would the authors be open to a Python 3 port? :)
>
> -Ba
On Dec 04, 2012, at 06:42 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>That allows Canonical to make proprietary forks of the code (eg, to
>engage in the dual licensing business model). This is very
>troublesome for me; it's too asymmetric a relationship.
Not to diminish your own concerns, but it doesn't bother me.
Ian Jackson writes:
> Barry Warsaw writes ("Re: Contributor agreements and copyright assignment
> (was Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems)"):
>> FTR: http://www.canonical.com/contributors
>
> That allows Canonical to make proprietary forks of the code (eg, to
> engage in the dual licensing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Aurélien Roux"
* Package name: tapeutape
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Florent Berthaut
* URL : http://hitmuri.net/index.php/Software/Tapeutape
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : a lightweig
Bjørn Mork writes:
> IANAL, but I believe you are wrong there. You give them much wider
> rights than this by assigning the copyright to the FSF. The copyright
> owner is free to relicense the work in any way they want.
Have you see the copyright assignment contract that you make with the FSF?
On Dec 04, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>The main issue for some of us is not so much the ethical objections to
>these sorts of agreements but rather the fact that our employers flatly
>are not interested in signing anything of the sort, ever, with anyone.
>Much of my free software work
On 2012-12-04 12:42:33 -0800 (-0800), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> The main issue for some of us is not so much the ethical
> objections to these sorts of agreements but rather the fact that
> our employers flatly are not interested in signing anything of the
> sort, ever, with anyone. Much of my fr
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:58:54PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > >It's currently tied to Python 2.7 (but not to a very high degree, it's
> > >totally backportable).
>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:00:35PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:58:54PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > > On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > >
> > > >It's currently tied to Pyt
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:42:37PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes ("Re: Contributor agreements and copyright assignment
> (was Re: Really, about udev, not init sytsems)"):
> > FTR: http://www.canonical.com/contributors
> That allows Canonical to make proprietary forks of the code
On 04.12.2012 20:40, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> What are the chances of dput-ng becoming available in backports (well, once
>> we
>> release, backported to wheezy at least)?
>
> Erm, I failed to parse this correctly, as RoboTux pointed out to me.
Thing is, we as dput authors would be perfectly f
Hi Paul,
On Di 04 Dez 2012 23:16:17 CET Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:00:35PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2012, 15:07 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:58:54PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, P
On Dec 05, 2012, at 01:19 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>Note that finally Python Paramiko has a new upstream[1]. Code gets developed
>on Github[2]. You might want to file an issue about Python3 compatibility
>there.
Good to hear about Paramiko. There's already a Python 3 issue open:
https://github.c
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:42:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bjørn Mork writes:
>
> > IANAL, but I believe you are wrong there. You give them much wider
> > rights than this by assigning the copyright to the FSF. The copyright
> > owner is free to relicense the work in any way they want.
>
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 01:19:28AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
Heyya, Mike,
>
> Note that finally Python Paramiko has a new upstream[1]. Code gets
> developed on Github[2]. You might want to file an issue about
> Python3 compatibility there.
>
> Greets,
> Mike
>
> [1] http://bitproph
27 matches
Mail list logo
