Am 22.11.2012 08:37, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
Le jeudi 22 novembre 2012 à 07:21 +0100, Michael Schmitt a écrit :
Now I see how that works for the gnome folks! *lol* Really, if the
general gnome attitude is "all complaints are dumb and should be
ignored, what we do is the holly grail" then...
P
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
> What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or all
> (as
> in arch:any) packages on buildds.
Are there any reasons to not built arch:all on buildds aside from
technical problems?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.as
Original Message
Subject: Re: ITP: qmapcontrol -- Qt/Qtopia widget for using map data
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:33:46 +0100
From: Ralf Treinen
To: Michael Olberg
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:36:24AM +0100, Michael Olberg wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* P
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:35:51AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Are you kidding me? The Bonobo interface in gnome-panel 2.x is a
> horrible PITA. And this is not about reinventing the wheel, it’s basic
> porting work that anyone with basic C and autotools knowledge can do.
The "we link against
Le jeudi 22 novembre 2012 à 09:29 +0100, Michael Schmitt a écrit :
> > Please read http://theoatmeal.com/comics/making_things (especially the
> > last part about comments). It completely applies here.
> Just one thing, no, that comic does not explain how a fruitful
> relationship between $PROJEC
Hello!
Gergely Nagy has written on Thursday, 22 November, at 0:05:
>If you read my mail further, your question is answered there. But I'll
>repeat it, for good measures: no, it does not mean that. I only means
>that your syslogd of choice is getting its input from
>/run/systemd/journal/syslog
Michael Schmitt writes ("Re: debian mate"):
> Am 21.11.2012 10:30, schrieb Neil Williams:
> > As part of the Debian release team it is Adam's call to make. He's
> > declared his decision which is fully in line with the freeze policy and
> > that's that. There is no point even thinking about MATE in
On 22 Nov 2012, at 15:57, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So if you don't like that decision it should be escalated to the
> Technical Committee.
I'm surprised that *anyone* can refer issues to tech ctte. Has a non DD ever
submitted something worthwhile?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@l
* Jon Dowland , 2012-11-22, 18:33:
So if you don't like that decision it should be escalated to the
Technical Committee.
I'm surprised that *anyone* can refer issues to tech ctte.
I'm surprised you're surprised.
Has a non DD ever submitted something worthwhile?
#587886 (lilo maintainership
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: linux-minidisc
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : linux-minidisc project
* URL : https://wiki.physik.fu-berlin.de/linux-minidisc
* License : GPLv2, LGPLv2.1
Programming Lang: C,
> GNOME Classic is just as featureful and usable as GNOME Shell,
> which makes it very suitable for a default desktop on non-3D machines.
But GNOME Fallback is going to be dropped soon. And the next GNOME
release, also if it will support a classic session with extensions, is
not suitable in old
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 23:51 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
> > GNOME Classic is just as featureful and usable as GNOME Shell,
> > which makes it very suitable for a default desktop on non-3D machines.
>
> But GNOME Fallback is going to be dropped soon. And the next GNOME
> release, also if it
On Nov 23, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 23:51 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
>>> GNOME Classic is just as featureful and usable as GNOME Shell,
>>> which makes it very suitable for a default desktop on non-3D machines.
>>
>> But GNOME Fallback is going to be
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 487 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 138 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> * Package name: linux-minidisc
Thats a strange name considering it builds and runs on MacOS, Windows,
Linux, FreeBSD and Haiku.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.
I demand that Kevin Toppins may or may not have written...
> On 19 November 2012 04:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
[snip]
>> And thirdly, if you have very large file systems (we have a 30TB hardware
>> raid here, for example), filesystem checks can take forever. If you
>> reboot such a se
I demand that John Paul Adrian Glaubitz may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Even the claims of the Gentoo people about the separate /usr partition
> are unjustified [4].
> [4] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
From that page:
“There is no way to reliably br
Since yesterday, my tools can now finally turn the whole dependency
graph
Does this "whole dependency graph" include the implicit build-dependency
every package has on build-essential?
The above case for example has no
alternative solution as the cycle is of length two and has no other way
of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: oz
Version: 0.9.0
Upstream Author: Chris Lalancette
URL: http://aeolusproject.org/oz.html
License: LGPL-2.1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: psphere
Version: 0.5.1
Upstream Author: Jonathan Kinred
URL: https://github.com/jkinred/psphere
License: Apache-2.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: hail (cld / chunkd / libhail0 / libhail-doc)
Version: 0.8+0.10.gf9c5b967
Upstream Author: 2009-2011 Pete Zaitcev
2005-2011 Je
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: iwhd
Version: 1.6
Upstream Author: Jeff Darcy
Jim Meyering
Pete Zaitcev
Chris Lalancette
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cl...@lists.debian.org
Package name: imagefactory
Version: 1.1.2
Upstream Author: Steve Loranz
Ian McLeod
URL: http://www.aeolusproject.org/imagefact
you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > What is yet unclear is if we want to build all (as in arch:any+all) or
> all (as
> > in arch:an
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:06:22PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> you always need to build for one arch and test, then why not upload it?
How is that related to my question? Also, please don't top-post and dont
send me copies.
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > On We
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:51:06PM +0100, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
> > GNOME Classic is just as featureful and usable as GNOME Shell,
> > which makes it very suitable for a default desktop on non-3D machines.
>
> But GNOME Fallback is going to be dropped soon.
I'm surprised nobody has talked abo
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> [snip]
> > Even the claims of the Gentoo people about the separate /usr partition
> > are unjustified [4].
>
> > [4] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
>
> From that page:
>
> “There is no way to reli
27 matches
Mail list logo
