Re: mass bug filing about packages manipulating/deleting shipped files

2012-09-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/20/2012 12:25 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: I've never seen somebody starting to use "conffile" when he really meant "configuration file". I've never seen it either. But I've seen many instances of the following: - A knowledgeable DD write about "conffiles" - a newbie writing "yes but my config

conffiles

2012-09-21 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Thomas Goirand writes: […] > BTW, "conffiles" is a pretty bad name. It's confusing, as you can > see once more. > I thought about calling it "dpkg-conffiles" which has the advantage > of underlying that we leave the handling of the file to the > responsibility of dpkg, keeps the sam

Re: packages with E: md5sum-mismatch in the archive

2012-09-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-20 19:20, Jakub Wilk wrote: > A binNMU would just paper over the actual bug. guile-1.6 debian/rules > has this: > > dh_md5sums > sed -i "/dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/" `find $(CURDIR)/debian/ -name > '*.la'` > dh_builddeb Thanks for looking into the source. I skipped this af

Re: Conflict usr/bin/ninja vs usr/sbin/ninja ?

2012-09-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I just sponsored the ninja-build package. I realize now that I may > have missed one point: does it need to conflict with package ninja ? > ninja-build will provide usr/bin/ninja, while ninja provides > usr/sbin/ninja. > > Th

Re: mass bug filing about packages manipulating/deleting shipped files

2012-09-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-18 09:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> mirror_2.9-62 >> /usr/share/doc/mirror/mirror.txt.gz >> /usr/share/doc/mirror/html/mirror-ref.html >> /usr/share/mirror/mirror.pl >> /usr/share/mirror/dateconv.pl >> /usr/share/mirror/lchat.pl >> /usr/share/mirror/lsparse.pl >> /usr/shar

Re: mass bug filing about packages with empty /usr/share/doc/$package/ (no copyright file)?

2012-09-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-16 18:36, Bart Martens wrote: >> I'm offering help, but only for part of the work : I could write a perl >> script >> that periodically scans the logfiles and submits additional bugs. > > I have written that script, and I think it's ready for use. Thanks a lot for filing these bugs! W

Re: mass bug filing about packages manipulating/deleting shipped files

2012-09-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andreas Beckmann , 2012-09-21, 14:30: mirror_2.9-62 /usr/share/doc/mirror/mirror.txt.gz /usr/share/doc/mirror/html/mirror-ref.html /usr/share/mirror/mirror.pl /usr/share/mirror/dateconv.pl /usr/share/mirror/lchat.pl /usr/share/mirror/lsparse.pl /usr/share/mirror/ftp.pl /usr/bin/

Re: Comments on Mate DE

2012-09-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/20/2012 01:58 AM, superuserlaptop wrote: This to me is a form of sabotage. It turns out that "superuserlaptop" is using a Squeeze system, half upgraded, with a MATE Wheezy unofficial repository, both Stable, Wheezy and SID repositories in his sources.list but without doing a dist-upgrade,

Re: Comments on Mate DE

2012-09-21 Thread Jon Dowland
That's not really of any interest to -devel, and I guess you're quoting info from private mail here. Please let's keep this list useful. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:/

Re: Debian Policy 3.9.4.0 released

2012-09-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Joey Hess writes ("Re: Debian Policy 3.9.4.0 released"): > That would include large numbers of haskell libraries and binaries that > statically link other haskell libraries. Even though most such > libraries actually have no source license requirements. The requirement to ship the source for the b

Re: node-like file conflicts

2012-09-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-08-06, 15:37: The following package pairs: 1) are co-installable, 2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin): There's a few more if you take alternatives into account: boom: alliance prb

Re: mass bug filing about packages manipulating/deleting shipped files

2012-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Jakub Wilk writes: > Really? I didn't read the license, but either it's not neccessary, or > it's a DFSG§4 violation: “The license must explicitly permit > distribution of software built from modified source code.” I'm not sure why mirror is still doing this, given the correspondence recorded in

Re: node-like file conflicts

2012-09-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Jakub Wilk writes: > There's a few more if you take alternatives into account: > tf: tf tf5 (Speaking with my tf5 maintainer hat on.) The current arrangement of these packages is weird, but I'm not sure how much trouble it's causing. tf ships /usr/games/tf and tf5 ships /usr/bin/tf5. Both of

assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread peter green
While working on debian one thing I have not managed to find is documentation on what packages can and can't assume about the build environment. Does such documentation exist and if not should it be created. Some specific cases i'm wondering about: I just discovered that on my beagleboard XM (

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread peter green
peter green wrote: Some time ago I found that a package (I think it was openjdk but I don't remember for sure) which relied on uname -r sorry I meam -m not -r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:24PM +0100, peter green wrote: > While working on debian one thing I have not managed to find is > documentation on what packages can and can't assume about the build > environment. Does such documentation exist and if not should it be > created. > > Some specific cas

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:07:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:24PM +0100, peter green wrote: > > Some time ago I found that a package (I think it was openjdk but I > > don't remember for sure) which relied on uname -r such that linux32 > > had to be used to build it

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:24PM +0100, peter green wrote: > I just discovered that on my beagleboard XM (under armhf sid) nacl > (which previously build on a debian experimental armhf buildd but > not a debian unstable armhf buildd) will build if /sys is mounted > but will not build if it is not

Bug#688352: ITP: libhttp-cookiemonster-perl -- module for easy read/write access to HTTP::Cookies jar

2012-09-21 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libhttp-cookiemonster-perl Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Olaf Alders * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-CookieMonst

Re: mass bug filing about packages with empty /usr/share/doc/$package/ (no copyright file)?

2012-09-21 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:35:40PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2012-09-16 18:36, Bart Martens wrote: > >> I'm offering help, but only for part of the work : I could write a perl > >> script > >> that periodically scans the logfiles and submits additional bugs. > > > > I have written that

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:24PM +0100, peter green wrote: > While working on debian one thing I have not managed to find is > documentation on what packages can and can't assume about the build > environment. Does such documentation exist and if not should it be > created. One thing that is at

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* peter green [120921 21:26]: > I just discovered that on my beagleboard XM (under armhf sid) nacl > (which previously build on a debian experimental armhf buildd but > not a debian unstable armhf buildd) will build if /sys is mounted > but will not build if it is not mounted. Can packages assume

python-twitter is not maintained

2012-09-21 Thread Koichi Akabe
Hi, I want to use python-twitter package [1], but this package is old and it's not able to be used [2]. The current maintainer said he will update it in the following days, but it has never updated for one and a half years. I think he is not active now [3]. Can I take over this package? [1] http

Bug#688362: ITP: glogic -- logic circuit simulator for students

2012-09-21 Thread Koichi Akabe
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Koichi Akabe * Package name: glogic Version : 2.4 Upstream Author : Koichi Akabe * URL : https://launchpad.net/glogic * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : logic circuit simulator for students

Re: python-twitter is not maintained

2012-09-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:38:06AM +0900, Koichi Akabe a écrit : > > I want to use python-twitter package [1], but this package is old and > it's not able to be used [2]. The current maintainer said he will > update it in the following days, but it has never updated for one and > a half years. I t

Bug#688363: Document assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy Severity: whishlist Version: 3.9.4.0 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:23:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > I think it would also be a good idea to have this documented in > policy if it's not already. I totally agree. I created a

Re: python-twitter is not maintained

2012-09-21 Thread Koichi Akabe
Hi, On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:16:16 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: > this is a team-maintained package, so the best place to ask is the team's > mailing list (debian-python in that case). > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/ Okay, I forwarded it to: http://lists.debian.org/debian-

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 01:25 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * peter green [120921 21:26]: > > I just discovered that on my beagleboard XM (under armhf sid) nacl > > (which previously build on a debian experimental armhf buildd but > > not a debian unstable armhf buildd) will build if /sys is moun

Re: assumptions about the build environment.

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 23:06 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:07:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:26:24PM +0100, peter green wrote: > > > Some time ago I found that a package (I think it was openjdk but I > > > don't remember for sure) which rel

Bug#688367: ITP: erlang-bear -- set of statistics functions for erlang

2012-09-21 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu * Package name: erlang-bear Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Joe Williams * URL : https://github.com/boundary/bear.git * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: erlang Description : Set of statist